Cargando…
Pullout Strength Predictor: A Machine Learning Approach
STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study. PURPOSE: To develop a predictive model for pullout strength. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Spine fusion surgeries are performed to correct joint deformities by restricting motion between two or more unstable vertebrae. The pedicle screw provides a corrective force to t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6773988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31154706 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0243 |
_version_ | 1783456005464522752 |
---|---|
author | Khatri, Ravi Varghese, Vicky Sharma, Sunil Kumar, Gurunathan Saravana Chhabra, Harvinder Singh |
author_facet | Khatri, Ravi Varghese, Vicky Sharma, Sunil Kumar, Gurunathan Saravana Chhabra, Harvinder Singh |
author_sort | Khatri, Ravi |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study. PURPOSE: To develop a predictive model for pullout strength. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Spine fusion surgeries are performed to correct joint deformities by restricting motion between two or more unstable vertebrae. The pedicle screw provides a corrective force to the unstable spinal segment and arrests motions at the unit that are being fused. To determine the hold of a screw, surgeons depend on a subjective perioperative feeling of insertion torque. The objective of the paper was to develop a machine learning based model using density of foam, insertion angle, insertion depth, and reinsertion to predict the pullout strength of pedicle screw. METHODS: To predict the pullout strength of pedicle screw, an experimental dataset of 48 data points was used as training data to construct a model based on different machine learning algorithms. A total of five algorithms were tested in the Weka environment and the performance was evaluated based on correlation coefficient and error matrix. A sensitive study of various parameters for obtaining the best combination of parameters for predicting the pullout strength was also preformed using the L9 orthogonal array of Taguchi Design of Experiments. RESULTS: Random forest performed the best with a correlation coefficient of 0.96, relative absolute error of 0.28, and root relative squared error of 0.29. The difference between the experimental and predicted value for the six test cases was not significant (p >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This model can be used clinically for understanding the failure of pedicle screw pullout and pre-surgical planning for spine surgeon. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6773988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67739882019-10-09 Pullout Strength Predictor: A Machine Learning Approach Khatri, Ravi Varghese, Vicky Sharma, Sunil Kumar, Gurunathan Saravana Chhabra, Harvinder Singh Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study. PURPOSE: To develop a predictive model for pullout strength. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Spine fusion surgeries are performed to correct joint deformities by restricting motion between two or more unstable vertebrae. The pedicle screw provides a corrective force to the unstable spinal segment and arrests motions at the unit that are being fused. To determine the hold of a screw, surgeons depend on a subjective perioperative feeling of insertion torque. The objective of the paper was to develop a machine learning based model using density of foam, insertion angle, insertion depth, and reinsertion to predict the pullout strength of pedicle screw. METHODS: To predict the pullout strength of pedicle screw, an experimental dataset of 48 data points was used as training data to construct a model based on different machine learning algorithms. A total of five algorithms were tested in the Weka environment and the performance was evaluated based on correlation coefficient and error matrix. A sensitive study of various parameters for obtaining the best combination of parameters for predicting the pullout strength was also preformed using the L9 orthogonal array of Taguchi Design of Experiments. RESULTS: Random forest performed the best with a correlation coefficient of 0.96, relative absolute error of 0.28, and root relative squared error of 0.29. The difference between the experimental and predicted value for the six test cases was not significant (p >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This model can be used clinically for understanding the failure of pedicle screw pullout and pre-surgical planning for spine surgeon. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2019-10 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6773988/ /pubmed/31154706 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0243 Text en Copyright © 2019 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Khatri, Ravi Varghese, Vicky Sharma, Sunil Kumar, Gurunathan Saravana Chhabra, Harvinder Singh Pullout Strength Predictor: A Machine Learning Approach |
title | Pullout Strength Predictor: A Machine Learning Approach |
title_full | Pullout Strength Predictor: A Machine Learning Approach |
title_fullStr | Pullout Strength Predictor: A Machine Learning Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Pullout Strength Predictor: A Machine Learning Approach |
title_short | Pullout Strength Predictor: A Machine Learning Approach |
title_sort | pullout strength predictor: a machine learning approach |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6773988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31154706 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khatriravi pulloutstrengthpredictoramachinelearningapproach AT varghesevicky pulloutstrengthpredictoramachinelearningapproach AT sharmasunil pulloutstrengthpredictoramachinelearningapproach AT kumargurunathansaravana pulloutstrengthpredictoramachinelearningapproach AT chhabraharvindersingh pulloutstrengthpredictoramachinelearningapproach |