Cargando…

Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study

BACKGROUND: The identification of individuals at increased risk of poor health-related outcomes is a priority. Geriatric research has proposed several indicators shown to be associated with these outcomes, but a head-to-head comparison of their predictive accuracy is still lacking. We therefore aime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zucchelli, Alberto, Vetrano, Davide L., Grande, Giulia, Calderón-Larrañaga, Amaia, Fratiglioni, Laura, Marengoni, Alessandra, Rizzuto, Debora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31575376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1418-2
_version_ 1783456038710673408
author Zucchelli, Alberto
Vetrano, Davide L.
Grande, Giulia
Calderón-Larrañaga, Amaia
Fratiglioni, Laura
Marengoni, Alessandra
Rizzuto, Debora
author_facet Zucchelli, Alberto
Vetrano, Davide L.
Grande, Giulia
Calderón-Larrañaga, Amaia
Fratiglioni, Laura
Marengoni, Alessandra
Rizzuto, Debora
author_sort Zucchelli, Alberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The identification of individuals at increased risk of poor health-related outcomes is a priority. Geriatric research has proposed several indicators shown to be associated with these outcomes, but a head-to-head comparison of their predictive accuracy is still lacking. We therefore aimed to compare the accuracy of five geriatric health indicators in predicting different outcomes among older persons: frailty index (FI), frailty phenotype (FP), walking speed (WS), multimorbidity, and a summary score including clinical diagnoses, functioning, and disability (the Health Assessment Tool; HAT). METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen, an ongoing longitudinal study including 3363 people aged 60+. To inspect the accuracy of geriatric health indicators, we employed areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the prediction of 3-year and 5-year mortality, 1-year and 3-year unplanned hospitalizations (1+), and contacts with healthcare providers in the 6 months before and after baseline evaluation (2+). RESULTS: FI, WS, and HAT showed the best accuracy in the prediction of mortality [AUC(95%CI) for 3-year mortality 0.84 (0.82–0.86), 0.85 (0.83–0.87), 0.87 (0.85–0.88) and AUC(95%CI) for 5-year mortality 0.84 (0.82–0.86), 0.85 (0.83–0.86), 0.86 (0.85–0.88), respectively]. Unplanned hospitalizations were better predicted by the FI [AUC(95%CI) 1-year 0.73 (0.71–0.76); 3-year 0.72 (0.70–0.73)] and HAT [AUC(95%CI) 1-year 0.73 (0.71–0.75); 3-year 0.71 (0.69–0.73)]. The most accurate predictor of multiple contacts with healthcare providers was multimorbidity [AUC(95%CI) 0.67 (0.65–0.68)]. Predictions were generally less accurate among younger individuals (< 78 years old). CONCLUSION: Specific geriatric health indicators predict clinical outcomes with different accuracy. Comprehensive indicators (HAT, FI, WS) perform better in predicting mortality and hospitalization. Multimorbidity exhibits the best accuracy in the prediction of multiple contacts with providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-019-1418-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6774220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67742202019-10-07 Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study Zucchelli, Alberto Vetrano, Davide L. Grande, Giulia Calderón-Larrañaga, Amaia Fratiglioni, Laura Marengoni, Alessandra Rizzuto, Debora BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The identification of individuals at increased risk of poor health-related outcomes is a priority. Geriatric research has proposed several indicators shown to be associated with these outcomes, but a head-to-head comparison of their predictive accuracy is still lacking. We therefore aimed to compare the accuracy of five geriatric health indicators in predicting different outcomes among older persons: frailty index (FI), frailty phenotype (FP), walking speed (WS), multimorbidity, and a summary score including clinical diagnoses, functioning, and disability (the Health Assessment Tool; HAT). METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen, an ongoing longitudinal study including 3363 people aged 60+. To inspect the accuracy of geriatric health indicators, we employed areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the prediction of 3-year and 5-year mortality, 1-year and 3-year unplanned hospitalizations (1+), and contacts with healthcare providers in the 6 months before and after baseline evaluation (2+). RESULTS: FI, WS, and HAT showed the best accuracy in the prediction of mortality [AUC(95%CI) for 3-year mortality 0.84 (0.82–0.86), 0.85 (0.83–0.87), 0.87 (0.85–0.88) and AUC(95%CI) for 5-year mortality 0.84 (0.82–0.86), 0.85 (0.83–0.86), 0.86 (0.85–0.88), respectively]. Unplanned hospitalizations were better predicted by the FI [AUC(95%CI) 1-year 0.73 (0.71–0.76); 3-year 0.72 (0.70–0.73)] and HAT [AUC(95%CI) 1-year 0.73 (0.71–0.75); 3-year 0.71 (0.69–0.73)]. The most accurate predictor of multiple contacts with healthcare providers was multimorbidity [AUC(95%CI) 0.67 (0.65–0.68)]. Predictions were generally less accurate among younger individuals (< 78 years old). CONCLUSION: Specific geriatric health indicators predict clinical outcomes with different accuracy. Comprehensive indicators (HAT, FI, WS) perform better in predicting mortality and hospitalization. Multimorbidity exhibits the best accuracy in the prediction of multiple contacts with providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-019-1418-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6774220/ /pubmed/31575376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1418-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zucchelli, Alberto
Vetrano, Davide L.
Grande, Giulia
Calderón-Larrañaga, Amaia
Fratiglioni, Laura
Marengoni, Alessandra
Rizzuto, Debora
Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study
title Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study
title_full Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study
title_fullStr Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study
title_short Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study
title_sort comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31575376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1418-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zucchellialberto comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy
AT vetranodavidel comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy
AT grandegiulia comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy
AT calderonlarranagaamaia comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy
AT fratiglionilaura comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy
AT marengonialessandra comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy
AT rizzutodebora comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy