Cargando…
Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study
BACKGROUND: The identification of individuals at increased risk of poor health-related outcomes is a priority. Geriatric research has proposed several indicators shown to be associated with these outcomes, but a head-to-head comparison of their predictive accuracy is still lacking. We therefore aime...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31575376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1418-2 |
_version_ | 1783456038710673408 |
---|---|
author | Zucchelli, Alberto Vetrano, Davide L. Grande, Giulia Calderón-Larrañaga, Amaia Fratiglioni, Laura Marengoni, Alessandra Rizzuto, Debora |
author_facet | Zucchelli, Alberto Vetrano, Davide L. Grande, Giulia Calderón-Larrañaga, Amaia Fratiglioni, Laura Marengoni, Alessandra Rizzuto, Debora |
author_sort | Zucchelli, Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The identification of individuals at increased risk of poor health-related outcomes is a priority. Geriatric research has proposed several indicators shown to be associated with these outcomes, but a head-to-head comparison of their predictive accuracy is still lacking. We therefore aimed to compare the accuracy of five geriatric health indicators in predicting different outcomes among older persons: frailty index (FI), frailty phenotype (FP), walking speed (WS), multimorbidity, and a summary score including clinical diagnoses, functioning, and disability (the Health Assessment Tool; HAT). METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen, an ongoing longitudinal study including 3363 people aged 60+. To inspect the accuracy of geriatric health indicators, we employed areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the prediction of 3-year and 5-year mortality, 1-year and 3-year unplanned hospitalizations (1+), and contacts with healthcare providers in the 6 months before and after baseline evaluation (2+). RESULTS: FI, WS, and HAT showed the best accuracy in the prediction of mortality [AUC(95%CI) for 3-year mortality 0.84 (0.82–0.86), 0.85 (0.83–0.87), 0.87 (0.85–0.88) and AUC(95%CI) for 5-year mortality 0.84 (0.82–0.86), 0.85 (0.83–0.86), 0.86 (0.85–0.88), respectively]. Unplanned hospitalizations were better predicted by the FI [AUC(95%CI) 1-year 0.73 (0.71–0.76); 3-year 0.72 (0.70–0.73)] and HAT [AUC(95%CI) 1-year 0.73 (0.71–0.75); 3-year 0.71 (0.69–0.73)]. The most accurate predictor of multiple contacts with healthcare providers was multimorbidity [AUC(95%CI) 0.67 (0.65–0.68)]. Predictions were generally less accurate among younger individuals (< 78 years old). CONCLUSION: Specific geriatric health indicators predict clinical outcomes with different accuracy. Comprehensive indicators (HAT, FI, WS) perform better in predicting mortality and hospitalization. Multimorbidity exhibits the best accuracy in the prediction of multiple contacts with providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-019-1418-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6774220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67742202019-10-07 Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study Zucchelli, Alberto Vetrano, Davide L. Grande, Giulia Calderón-Larrañaga, Amaia Fratiglioni, Laura Marengoni, Alessandra Rizzuto, Debora BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The identification of individuals at increased risk of poor health-related outcomes is a priority. Geriatric research has proposed several indicators shown to be associated with these outcomes, but a head-to-head comparison of their predictive accuracy is still lacking. We therefore aimed to compare the accuracy of five geriatric health indicators in predicting different outcomes among older persons: frailty index (FI), frailty phenotype (FP), walking speed (WS), multimorbidity, and a summary score including clinical diagnoses, functioning, and disability (the Health Assessment Tool; HAT). METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen, an ongoing longitudinal study including 3363 people aged 60+. To inspect the accuracy of geriatric health indicators, we employed areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the prediction of 3-year and 5-year mortality, 1-year and 3-year unplanned hospitalizations (1+), and contacts with healthcare providers in the 6 months before and after baseline evaluation (2+). RESULTS: FI, WS, and HAT showed the best accuracy in the prediction of mortality [AUC(95%CI) for 3-year mortality 0.84 (0.82–0.86), 0.85 (0.83–0.87), 0.87 (0.85–0.88) and AUC(95%CI) for 5-year mortality 0.84 (0.82–0.86), 0.85 (0.83–0.86), 0.86 (0.85–0.88), respectively]. Unplanned hospitalizations were better predicted by the FI [AUC(95%CI) 1-year 0.73 (0.71–0.76); 3-year 0.72 (0.70–0.73)] and HAT [AUC(95%CI) 1-year 0.73 (0.71–0.75); 3-year 0.71 (0.69–0.73)]. The most accurate predictor of multiple contacts with healthcare providers was multimorbidity [AUC(95%CI) 0.67 (0.65–0.68)]. Predictions were generally less accurate among younger individuals (< 78 years old). CONCLUSION: Specific geriatric health indicators predict clinical outcomes with different accuracy. Comprehensive indicators (HAT, FI, WS) perform better in predicting mortality and hospitalization. Multimorbidity exhibits the best accuracy in the prediction of multiple contacts with providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-019-1418-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6774220/ /pubmed/31575376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1418-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zucchelli, Alberto Vetrano, Davide L. Grande, Giulia Calderón-Larrañaga, Amaia Fratiglioni, Laura Marengoni, Alessandra Rizzuto, Debora Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study |
title | Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study |
title_full | Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study |
title_fullStr | Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study |
title_short | Comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study |
title_sort | comparing the prognostic value of geriatric health indicators: a population-based study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31575376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1418-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zucchellialberto comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy AT vetranodavidel comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy AT grandegiulia comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy AT calderonlarranagaamaia comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy AT fratiglionilaura comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy AT marengonialessandra comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy AT rizzutodebora comparingtheprognosticvalueofgeriatrichealthindicatorsapopulationbasedstudy |