Cargando…
Green technology innovation: Anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective
This paper examines how established firms use their core competences to diversify their business by exploring and ultimately developing green technologies. In contrast to start‐ups dedicated to a green mission, diversifying into green markets by developing new products based on existing core compete...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2295 |
_version_ | 1783456063892226048 |
---|---|
author | Wicki, Samuel Hansen, Erik G. |
author_facet | Wicki, Samuel Hansen, Erik G. |
author_sort | Wicki, Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper examines how established firms use their core competences to diversify their business by exploring and ultimately developing green technologies. In contrast to start‐ups dedicated to a green mission, diversifying into green markets by developing new products based on existing core competences has proven to be challenging. This is because the exploration processes to find a match between green technology opportunities and internal competences is complex and new to most established firms. This paper gains insights into exploration processes for green technologies and the learning modes and outcomes linked to these processes. We examined exploration processes at the microlevel in an embedded case study of an engineering firm using a combination of the “fireworks” innovation process model and organizational learning theory. First, we found that developing green technologies involves a long‐term exploratory process without guarantee of (quick) success and likely involves many exploration failures. Second, as exploration unfolds along multiple technology trajectories, learning occurs in individual exploration paths (on‐path), when new paths are pursued (path‐initiation), and when knowledge from one path is spilled over to subsequent paths (across‐paths). Third, to increase their chances for success, firms can increase the efficiency of exploration by fostering a failure‐friendly organizational culture, deliberately experimenting, and purposefully learning from failures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6774329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67743292019-10-07 Green technology innovation: Anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective Wicki, Samuel Hansen, Erik G. Bus Strategy Environ Research Articles This paper examines how established firms use their core competences to diversify their business by exploring and ultimately developing green technologies. In contrast to start‐ups dedicated to a green mission, diversifying into green markets by developing new products based on existing core competences has proven to be challenging. This is because the exploration processes to find a match between green technology opportunities and internal competences is complex and new to most established firms. This paper gains insights into exploration processes for green technologies and the learning modes and outcomes linked to these processes. We examined exploration processes at the microlevel in an embedded case study of an engineering firm using a combination of the “fireworks” innovation process model and organizational learning theory. First, we found that developing green technologies involves a long‐term exploratory process without guarantee of (quick) success and likely involves many exploration failures. Second, as exploration unfolds along multiple technology trajectories, learning occurs in individual exploration paths (on‐path), when new paths are pursued (path‐initiation), and when knowledge from one path is spilled over to subsequent paths (across‐paths). Third, to increase their chances for success, firms can increase the efficiency of exploration by fostering a failure‐friendly organizational culture, deliberately experimenting, and purposefully learning from failures. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-03 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6774329/ /pubmed/31598038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2295 Text en © 2019 The Authors Business Strategy and The Environment published by ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Wicki, Samuel Hansen, Erik G. Green technology innovation: Anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective |
title | Green technology innovation: Anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective |
title_full | Green technology innovation: Anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective |
title_fullStr | Green technology innovation: Anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Green technology innovation: Anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective |
title_short | Green technology innovation: Anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective |
title_sort | green technology innovation: anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2295 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wickisamuel greentechnologyinnovationanatomyofexplorationprocessesfromalearningperspective AT hansenerikg greentechnologyinnovationanatomyofexplorationprocessesfromalearningperspective |