Cargando…

Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Snorkel Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Competing yet Complementary Strategies

Juxtarenal/pararenal aortic aneurysms and type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms pose particular technical challenges for endovascular repair as they involve the visceral segment in addition to insufficient infrarenal neck for the use of standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) devices. To overcome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Yoon, William J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Vascular Specialist International 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620398
http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2019.35.3.121
_version_ 1783456079155298304
author Yoon, William J.
author_facet Yoon, William J.
author_sort Yoon, William J.
collection PubMed
description Juxtarenal/pararenal aortic aneurysms and type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms pose particular technical challenges for endovascular repair as they involve the visceral segment in addition to insufficient infrarenal neck for the use of standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) devices. To overcome these challenges, complex EVAR techniques have been developed to extend the proximal landing zone cephalad with maintaining perfusion to vital aortic branches, thereby broadening the applicability of endografting from the infrarenal to the suprarenal aorta. Complex EVAR can be divided into two broad categories: fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) and snorkel EVAR. FEVAR is a valid procedure with the standardized procedure, although it remains as a relatively complex procedure with a learning curve. Given time constraints for the custom fenestrated graft, snorkel EVAR may be an alternative for complex repairs in symptomatic or ruptured patients for whom custom-made endografts may not be immediately available. This article discusses these two most commonly used complex EVAR strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6774433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Vascular Specialist International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67744332019-10-16 Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Snorkel Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Competing yet Complementary Strategies Yoon, William J. Vasc Specialist Int Review Juxtarenal/pararenal aortic aneurysms and type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms pose particular technical challenges for endovascular repair as they involve the visceral segment in addition to insufficient infrarenal neck for the use of standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) devices. To overcome these challenges, complex EVAR techniques have been developed to extend the proximal landing zone cephalad with maintaining perfusion to vital aortic branches, thereby broadening the applicability of endografting from the infrarenal to the suprarenal aorta. Complex EVAR can be divided into two broad categories: fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) and snorkel EVAR. FEVAR is a valid procedure with the standardized procedure, although it remains as a relatively complex procedure with a learning curve. Given time constraints for the custom fenestrated graft, snorkel EVAR may be an alternative for complex repairs in symptomatic or ruptured patients for whom custom-made endografts may not be immediately available. This article discusses these two most commonly used complex EVAR strategies. Vascular Specialist International 2019-09 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6774433/ /pubmed/31620398 http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2019.35.3.121 Text en Copyright © 2019, The Korean Society for Vascular Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Yoon, William J.
Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Snorkel Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Competing yet Complementary Strategies
title Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Snorkel Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Competing yet Complementary Strategies
title_full Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Snorkel Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Competing yet Complementary Strategies
title_fullStr Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Snorkel Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Competing yet Complementary Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Snorkel Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Competing yet Complementary Strategies
title_short Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Snorkel Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Competing yet Complementary Strategies
title_sort fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus snorkel endovascular aneurysm repair: competing yet complementary strategies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620398
http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2019.35.3.121
work_keys_str_mv AT yoonwilliamj fenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairversussnorkelendovascularaneurysmrepaircompetingyetcomplementarystrategies