Cargando…

Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking

All too often the quality and rigor of topic investigations is inaccurately conveyed to information professionals, resulting in a mischaracterization of the research, which, if left unchecked and published, may in turn mislead potential readers. Accurately understanding and categorizing the types of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fox, Zachary E., Williams, Annette M., Blasingame, Mallory N., Koonce, Taneya Y., Kusnoor, Sheila V., Su, Jing, Lee, Patricia, Epelbaum, Marcia I., Naylor, Helen M., DesAutels, Spencer J., Frakes, Elizabeth T., Giuse, Nunzia Bettinsoli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Library Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31607825
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.707
Descripción
Sumario:All too often the quality and rigor of topic investigations is inaccurately conveyed to information professionals, resulting in a mischaracterization of the research, which, if left unchecked and published, may in turn mislead potential readers. Accurately understanding and categorizing the types of topic investigation searches that are requested of information professionals is critical to both meeting requestors’ needs and reflecting their intended methodological approaches. Information professionals’ expertise can be an invaluable resource to guide users through the investigative and publication process.