Cargando…
Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking
All too often the quality and rigor of topic investigations is inaccurately conveyed to information professionals, resulting in a mischaracterization of the research, which, if left unchecked and published, may in turn mislead potential readers. Accurately understanding and categorizing the types of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medical Library Association
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31607825 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.707 |
_version_ | 1783456093207265280 |
---|---|
author | Fox, Zachary E. Williams, Annette M. Blasingame, Mallory N. Koonce, Taneya Y. Kusnoor, Sheila V. Su, Jing Lee, Patricia Epelbaum, Marcia I. Naylor, Helen M. DesAutels, Spencer J. Frakes, Elizabeth T. Giuse, Nunzia Bettinsoli |
author_facet | Fox, Zachary E. Williams, Annette M. Blasingame, Mallory N. Koonce, Taneya Y. Kusnoor, Sheila V. Su, Jing Lee, Patricia Epelbaum, Marcia I. Naylor, Helen M. DesAutels, Spencer J. Frakes, Elizabeth T. Giuse, Nunzia Bettinsoli |
author_sort | Fox, Zachary E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | All too often the quality and rigor of topic investigations is inaccurately conveyed to information professionals, resulting in a mischaracterization of the research, which, if left unchecked and published, may in turn mislead potential readers. Accurately understanding and categorizing the types of topic investigation searches that are requested of information professionals is critical to both meeting requestors’ needs and reflecting their intended methodological approaches. Information professionals’ expertise can be an invaluable resource to guide users through the investigative and publication process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6774532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medical Library Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67745322019-10-11 Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking Fox, Zachary E. Williams, Annette M. Blasingame, Mallory N. Koonce, Taneya Y. Kusnoor, Sheila V. Su, Jing Lee, Patricia Epelbaum, Marcia I. Naylor, Helen M. DesAutels, Spencer J. Frakes, Elizabeth T. Giuse, Nunzia Bettinsoli J Med Libr Assoc Commentary All too often the quality and rigor of topic investigations is inaccurately conveyed to information professionals, resulting in a mischaracterization of the research, which, if left unchecked and published, may in turn mislead potential readers. Accurately understanding and categorizing the types of topic investigation searches that are requested of information professionals is critical to both meeting requestors’ needs and reflecting their intended methodological approaches. Information professionals’ expertise can be an invaluable resource to guide users through the investigative and publication process. Medical Library Association 2019-10 2019-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6774532/ /pubmed/31607825 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.707 Text en Copyright: © 2019, Authors. Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Commentary Fox, Zachary E. Williams, Annette M. Blasingame, Mallory N. Koonce, Taneya Y. Kusnoor, Sheila V. Su, Jing Lee, Patricia Epelbaum, Marcia I. Naylor, Helen M. DesAutels, Spencer J. Frakes, Elizabeth T. Giuse, Nunzia Bettinsoli Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking |
title | Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking |
title_full | Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking |
title_fullStr | Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking |
title_full_unstemmed | Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking |
title_short | Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking |
title_sort | why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31607825 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.707 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foxzacharye whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking AT williamsannettem whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking AT blasingamemalloryn whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking AT kooncetaneyay whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking AT kusnoorsheilav whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking AT sujing whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking AT leepatricia whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking AT epelbaummarciai whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking AT naylorhelenm whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking AT desautelsspencerj whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking AT frakeselizabetht whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking AT giusenunziabettinsoli whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking |