Cargando…

Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking

All too often the quality and rigor of topic investigations is inaccurately conveyed to information professionals, resulting in a mischaracterization of the research, which, if left unchecked and published, may in turn mislead potential readers. Accurately understanding and categorizing the types of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fox, Zachary E., Williams, Annette M., Blasingame, Mallory N., Koonce, Taneya Y., Kusnoor, Sheila V., Su, Jing, Lee, Patricia, Epelbaum, Marcia I., Naylor, Helen M., DesAutels, Spencer J., Frakes, Elizabeth T., Giuse, Nunzia Bettinsoli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Library Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31607825
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.707
_version_ 1783456093207265280
author Fox, Zachary E.
Williams, Annette M.
Blasingame, Mallory N.
Koonce, Taneya Y.
Kusnoor, Sheila V.
Su, Jing
Lee, Patricia
Epelbaum, Marcia I.
Naylor, Helen M.
DesAutels, Spencer J.
Frakes, Elizabeth T.
Giuse, Nunzia Bettinsoli
author_facet Fox, Zachary E.
Williams, Annette M.
Blasingame, Mallory N.
Koonce, Taneya Y.
Kusnoor, Sheila V.
Su, Jing
Lee, Patricia
Epelbaum, Marcia I.
Naylor, Helen M.
DesAutels, Spencer J.
Frakes, Elizabeth T.
Giuse, Nunzia Bettinsoli
author_sort Fox, Zachary E.
collection PubMed
description All too often the quality and rigor of topic investigations is inaccurately conveyed to information professionals, resulting in a mischaracterization of the research, which, if left unchecked and published, may in turn mislead potential readers. Accurately understanding and categorizing the types of topic investigation searches that are requested of information professionals is critical to both meeting requestors’ needs and reflecting their intended methodological approaches. Information professionals’ expertise can be an invaluable resource to guide users through the investigative and publication process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6774532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medical Library Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67745322019-10-11 Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking Fox, Zachary E. Williams, Annette M. Blasingame, Mallory N. Koonce, Taneya Y. Kusnoor, Sheila V. Su, Jing Lee, Patricia Epelbaum, Marcia I. Naylor, Helen M. DesAutels, Spencer J. Frakes, Elizabeth T. Giuse, Nunzia Bettinsoli J Med Libr Assoc Commentary All too often the quality and rigor of topic investigations is inaccurately conveyed to information professionals, resulting in a mischaracterization of the research, which, if left unchecked and published, may in turn mislead potential readers. Accurately understanding and categorizing the types of topic investigation searches that are requested of information professionals is critical to both meeting requestors’ needs and reflecting their intended methodological approaches. Information professionals’ expertise can be an invaluable resource to guide users through the investigative and publication process. Medical Library Association 2019-10 2019-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6774532/ /pubmed/31607825 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.707 Text en Copyright: © 2019, Authors. Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Commentary
Fox, Zachary E.
Williams, Annette M.
Blasingame, Mallory N.
Koonce, Taneya Y.
Kusnoor, Sheila V.
Su, Jing
Lee, Patricia
Epelbaum, Marcia I.
Naylor, Helen M.
DesAutels, Spencer J.
Frakes, Elizabeth T.
Giuse, Nunzia Bettinsoli
Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking
title Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking
title_full Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking
title_fullStr Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking
title_full_unstemmed Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking
title_short Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking
title_sort why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31607825
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.707
work_keys_str_mv AT foxzacharye whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking
AT williamsannettem whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking
AT blasingamemalloryn whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking
AT kooncetaneyay whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking
AT kusnoorsheilav whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking
AT sujing whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking
AT leepatricia whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking
AT epelbaummarciai whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking
AT naylorhelenm whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking
AT desautelsspencerj whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking
AT frakeselizabetht whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking
AT giusenunziabettinsoli whyequatingallevidencesearchestosystematicreviewsdefiestheirroleininformationseeking