Cargando…

Pacing in proximity to scar during cardiac resynchronization therapy increases local dispersion of repolarization and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmogenesis

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) increases the risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) when the left ventricular (LV) epicardial lead is implanted in proximity to scar. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanisms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendonca Costa, Caroline, Neic, Aurel, Kerfoot, Eric, Porter, Bradley, Sieniewicz, Benjamin, Gould, Justin, Sidhu, Baldeep, Chen, Zhong, Plank, Gernot, Rinaldi, Christopher A., Bishop, Martin J., Niederer, Steven A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30930329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.027
_version_ 1783456117919055872
author Mendonca Costa, Caroline
Neic, Aurel
Kerfoot, Eric
Porter, Bradley
Sieniewicz, Benjamin
Gould, Justin
Sidhu, Baldeep
Chen, Zhong
Plank, Gernot
Rinaldi, Christopher A.
Bishop, Martin J.
Niederer, Steven A.
author_facet Mendonca Costa, Caroline
Neic, Aurel
Kerfoot, Eric
Porter, Bradley
Sieniewicz, Benjamin
Gould, Justin
Sidhu, Baldeep
Chen, Zhong
Plank, Gernot
Rinaldi, Christopher A.
Bishop, Martin J.
Niederer, Steven A.
author_sort Mendonca Costa, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) increases the risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) when the left ventricular (LV) epicardial lead is implanted in proximity to scar. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanisms underpinning this risk by investigating the effects of pacing on local electrophysiology (EP) in relation to scar that provides a substrate for VT in ICM patients undergoing CRT. METHODS: Imaging data from ICM patients (n = 24) undergoing CRT were used to create patient-specific LV anatomic computational models including scar morphology. Simulations of LV epicardial pacing at 0.2–4.5 cm from the scar were performed using EP models of chronic infarct and heart failure (HF). Dispersion of repolarization and the vulnerable window were computed as surrogates for VT risk. RESULTS: Simulations predict that pacing in proximity to scar (0.2 cm) compared to more distant pacing to a scar (4.5 cm) significantly (P <.01) increased dispersion of repolarization in the vicinity of the scar and widened (P <.01) the vulnerable window, increasing the likelihood of unidirectional block. Moreover, slow conduction during HF further increased dispersion (∼194%). Analysis of variance and post hoc tests show significantly (P <.01) reduced repolarization dispersion when pacing ≥3.5 cm from the scar compared to pacing at 0.2 cm. CONCLUSION: Increased dispersion of repolarization in the vicinity of the scar and widening of the vulnerable window when pacing in proximity to scar provides a mechanistic explanation for VT induction in ICM-CRT with lead placement proximal to scar. Pacing 3.5 cm or more from scar may avoid increasing VT risk in ICM-CRT patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6774764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67747642019-10-02 Pacing in proximity to scar during cardiac resynchronization therapy increases local dispersion of repolarization and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmogenesis Mendonca Costa, Caroline Neic, Aurel Kerfoot, Eric Porter, Bradley Sieniewicz, Benjamin Gould, Justin Sidhu, Baldeep Chen, Zhong Plank, Gernot Rinaldi, Christopher A. Bishop, Martin J. Niederer, Steven A. Heart Rhythm Article BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) increases the risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) when the left ventricular (LV) epicardial lead is implanted in proximity to scar. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanisms underpinning this risk by investigating the effects of pacing on local electrophysiology (EP) in relation to scar that provides a substrate for VT in ICM patients undergoing CRT. METHODS: Imaging data from ICM patients (n = 24) undergoing CRT were used to create patient-specific LV anatomic computational models including scar morphology. Simulations of LV epicardial pacing at 0.2–4.5 cm from the scar were performed using EP models of chronic infarct and heart failure (HF). Dispersion of repolarization and the vulnerable window were computed as surrogates for VT risk. RESULTS: Simulations predict that pacing in proximity to scar (0.2 cm) compared to more distant pacing to a scar (4.5 cm) significantly (P <.01) increased dispersion of repolarization in the vicinity of the scar and widened (P <.01) the vulnerable window, increasing the likelihood of unidirectional block. Moreover, slow conduction during HF further increased dispersion (∼194%). Analysis of variance and post hoc tests show significantly (P <.01) reduced repolarization dispersion when pacing ≥3.5 cm from the scar compared to pacing at 0.2 cm. CONCLUSION: Increased dispersion of repolarization in the vicinity of the scar and widening of the vulnerable window when pacing in proximity to scar provides a mechanistic explanation for VT induction in ICM-CRT with lead placement proximal to scar. Pacing 3.5 cm or more from scar may avoid increasing VT risk in ICM-CRT patients. Elsevier 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6774764/ /pubmed/30930329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.027 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mendonca Costa, Caroline
Neic, Aurel
Kerfoot, Eric
Porter, Bradley
Sieniewicz, Benjamin
Gould, Justin
Sidhu, Baldeep
Chen, Zhong
Plank, Gernot
Rinaldi, Christopher A.
Bishop, Martin J.
Niederer, Steven A.
Pacing in proximity to scar during cardiac resynchronization therapy increases local dispersion of repolarization and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmogenesis
title Pacing in proximity to scar during cardiac resynchronization therapy increases local dispersion of repolarization and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmogenesis
title_full Pacing in proximity to scar during cardiac resynchronization therapy increases local dispersion of repolarization and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmogenesis
title_fullStr Pacing in proximity to scar during cardiac resynchronization therapy increases local dispersion of repolarization and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmogenesis
title_full_unstemmed Pacing in proximity to scar during cardiac resynchronization therapy increases local dispersion of repolarization and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmogenesis
title_short Pacing in proximity to scar during cardiac resynchronization therapy increases local dispersion of repolarization and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmogenesis
title_sort pacing in proximity to scar during cardiac resynchronization therapy increases local dispersion of repolarization and susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmogenesis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30930329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.027
work_keys_str_mv AT mendoncacostacaroline pacinginproximitytoscarduringcardiacresynchronizationtherapyincreaseslocaldispersionofrepolarizationandsusceptibilitytoventriculararrhythmogenesis
AT neicaurel pacinginproximitytoscarduringcardiacresynchronizationtherapyincreaseslocaldispersionofrepolarizationandsusceptibilitytoventriculararrhythmogenesis
AT kerfooteric pacinginproximitytoscarduringcardiacresynchronizationtherapyincreaseslocaldispersionofrepolarizationandsusceptibilitytoventriculararrhythmogenesis
AT porterbradley pacinginproximitytoscarduringcardiacresynchronizationtherapyincreaseslocaldispersionofrepolarizationandsusceptibilitytoventriculararrhythmogenesis
AT sieniewiczbenjamin pacinginproximitytoscarduringcardiacresynchronizationtherapyincreaseslocaldispersionofrepolarizationandsusceptibilitytoventriculararrhythmogenesis
AT gouldjustin pacinginproximitytoscarduringcardiacresynchronizationtherapyincreaseslocaldispersionofrepolarizationandsusceptibilitytoventriculararrhythmogenesis
AT sidhubaldeep pacinginproximitytoscarduringcardiacresynchronizationtherapyincreaseslocaldispersionofrepolarizationandsusceptibilitytoventriculararrhythmogenesis
AT chenzhong pacinginproximitytoscarduringcardiacresynchronizationtherapyincreaseslocaldispersionofrepolarizationandsusceptibilitytoventriculararrhythmogenesis
AT plankgernot pacinginproximitytoscarduringcardiacresynchronizationtherapyincreaseslocaldispersionofrepolarizationandsusceptibilitytoventriculararrhythmogenesis
AT rinaldichristophera pacinginproximitytoscarduringcardiacresynchronizationtherapyincreaseslocaldispersionofrepolarizationandsusceptibilitytoventriculararrhythmogenesis
AT bishopmartinj pacinginproximitytoscarduringcardiacresynchronizationtherapyincreaseslocaldispersionofrepolarizationandsusceptibilitytoventriculararrhythmogenesis
AT niedererstevena pacinginproximitytoscarduringcardiacresynchronizationtherapyincreaseslocaldispersionofrepolarizationandsusceptibilitytoventriculararrhythmogenesis