Cargando…
How long do anti-predator interventions remain effective? Patterns, thresholds and uncertainty
Human–predator conflicts are globally widespread, and effective interventions are essential to protect human assets from predator attacks. As effectiveness also has a temporal dimension, it is of importance to know how long interventions remain most effective and to determine time thresholds at whic...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190826 |
_version_ | 1783456131558932480 |
---|---|
author | Khorozyan, Igor Waltert, Matthias |
author_facet | Khorozyan, Igor Waltert, Matthias |
author_sort | Khorozyan, Igor |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human–predator conflicts are globally widespread, and effective interventions are essential to protect human assets from predator attacks. As effectiveness also has a temporal dimension, it is of importance to know how long interventions remain most effective and to determine time thresholds at which effectiveness begins to decrease. To address this, we conducted a systematic review of the temporal changes in the effectiveness of non-invasive interventions against terrestrial mammalian predators, defining a temporal trend line of effectiveness for each published case. We found only 26 cases from 14 publications, mainly referring to electric fences (n = 7 cases) and deterrents (n = 7 cases). We found electric fences and calving control to remain highly effective for the longest time, reducing damage by 100% for periods between three months and 3 years. The effectiveness of acoustical and light deterrents as well as guarding animals eroded quite fast after one to five months. Supplemental feeding was found to be counter-productive by increasing damage over time instead of reducing it. We stress that it is vital to make monitoring a routine requirement for all intervention applications and suggest to standardize periods of time over which monitoring can produce meaningful and affordable information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6774962 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67749622019-10-09 How long do anti-predator interventions remain effective? Patterns, thresholds and uncertainty Khorozyan, Igor Waltert, Matthias R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Human–predator conflicts are globally widespread, and effective interventions are essential to protect human assets from predator attacks. As effectiveness also has a temporal dimension, it is of importance to know how long interventions remain most effective and to determine time thresholds at which effectiveness begins to decrease. To address this, we conducted a systematic review of the temporal changes in the effectiveness of non-invasive interventions against terrestrial mammalian predators, defining a temporal trend line of effectiveness for each published case. We found only 26 cases from 14 publications, mainly referring to electric fences (n = 7 cases) and deterrents (n = 7 cases). We found electric fences and calving control to remain highly effective for the longest time, reducing damage by 100% for periods between three months and 3 years. The effectiveness of acoustical and light deterrents as well as guarding animals eroded quite fast after one to five months. Supplemental feeding was found to be counter-productive by increasing damage over time instead of reducing it. We stress that it is vital to make monitoring a routine requirement for all intervention applications and suggest to standardize periods of time over which monitoring can produce meaningful and affordable information. The Royal Society 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6774962/ /pubmed/31598307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190826 Text en © 2019 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Biology (Whole Organism) Khorozyan, Igor Waltert, Matthias How long do anti-predator interventions remain effective? Patterns, thresholds and uncertainty |
title | How long do anti-predator interventions remain effective? Patterns, thresholds and uncertainty |
title_full | How long do anti-predator interventions remain effective? Patterns, thresholds and uncertainty |
title_fullStr | How long do anti-predator interventions remain effective? Patterns, thresholds and uncertainty |
title_full_unstemmed | How long do anti-predator interventions remain effective? Patterns, thresholds and uncertainty |
title_short | How long do anti-predator interventions remain effective? Patterns, thresholds and uncertainty |
title_sort | how long do anti-predator interventions remain effective? patterns, thresholds and uncertainty |
topic | Biology (Whole Organism) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190826 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khorozyanigor howlongdoantipredatorinterventionsremaineffectivepatternsthresholdsanduncertainty AT waltertmatthias howlongdoantipredatorinterventionsremaineffectivepatternsthresholdsanduncertainty |