Cargando…

Convolution kernel and iterative reconstruction affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics and deep learning in lung adenocarcinoma pathological subtypes

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of convolution kernel and iterative reconstruction on the diagnostic performance of radiomics and deep learning (DL) in lung adenocarcinomas. METHODS: A total of 183 patients with 215 lung adenocarcinomas were included in this study....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Wei, Zhang, Wei, Sun, Yingli, Ye, Yuxiang, Yang, Jiancheng, Chen, Wufei, Gao, Pan, Li, Jianying, Li, Cheng, Jin, Liang, Wang, Peijun, Hua, Yanqing, Li, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31426132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13161
_version_ 1783456144299130880
author Zhao, Wei
Zhang, Wei
Sun, Yingli
Ye, Yuxiang
Yang, Jiancheng
Chen, Wufei
Gao, Pan
Li, Jianying
Li, Cheng
Jin, Liang
Wang, Peijun
Hua, Yanqing
Li, Ming
author_facet Zhao, Wei
Zhang, Wei
Sun, Yingli
Ye, Yuxiang
Yang, Jiancheng
Chen, Wufei
Gao, Pan
Li, Jianying
Li, Cheng
Jin, Liang
Wang, Peijun
Hua, Yanqing
Li, Ming
author_sort Zhao, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of convolution kernel and iterative reconstruction on the diagnostic performance of radiomics and deep learning (DL) in lung adenocarcinomas. METHODS: A total of 183 patients with 215 lung adenocarcinomas were included in this study. All CT imaging data was reconstructed with three reconstruction algorithms (ASiR at 0%, 30%, 60% strength), each with two convolution kernels (bone and standard). A total of 171 nodules were selected as the training‐validation set, whereas 44 nodules were selected as the testing set. Logistic regression and a DL framework‐DenseNets were selected to tackle the task. Three logical experiments were implemented to fully explore the influence of the studied parameters on the diagnostic performance. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the performance of constructed models. RESULTS: In Experiments A and B, no statistically significant results were found in the radiomic method, whereas two and six pairs were statistically significant (P < 0.05) in the DL method. In Experiment_C, significant differences in one and four models were found in the radiomics and DL methods, respectively. Moreover, models constructed with standard convolution kernel data outperformed that constructed with bone convolution kernel data in all studied ASiR levels in the DL method. In the DL method, B0 and S60 performed best in bone and standard convolution kernel, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that DL was more susceptible to CT parameter variability than radiomics. Standard convolution kernel images seem to be more appropriate for imaging analysis. Further investigation with a larger sample size is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6775016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67750162019-10-07 Convolution kernel and iterative reconstruction affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics and deep learning in lung adenocarcinoma pathological subtypes Zhao, Wei Zhang, Wei Sun, Yingli Ye, Yuxiang Yang, Jiancheng Chen, Wufei Gao, Pan Li, Jianying Li, Cheng Jin, Liang Wang, Peijun Hua, Yanqing Li, Ming Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of convolution kernel and iterative reconstruction on the diagnostic performance of radiomics and deep learning (DL) in lung adenocarcinomas. METHODS: A total of 183 patients with 215 lung adenocarcinomas were included in this study. All CT imaging data was reconstructed with three reconstruction algorithms (ASiR at 0%, 30%, 60% strength), each with two convolution kernels (bone and standard). A total of 171 nodules were selected as the training‐validation set, whereas 44 nodules were selected as the testing set. Logistic regression and a DL framework‐DenseNets were selected to tackle the task. Three logical experiments were implemented to fully explore the influence of the studied parameters on the diagnostic performance. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the performance of constructed models. RESULTS: In Experiments A and B, no statistically significant results were found in the radiomic method, whereas two and six pairs were statistically significant (P < 0.05) in the DL method. In Experiment_C, significant differences in one and four models were found in the radiomics and DL methods, respectively. Moreover, models constructed with standard convolution kernel data outperformed that constructed with bone convolution kernel data in all studied ASiR levels in the DL method. In the DL method, B0 and S60 performed best in bone and standard convolution kernel, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that DL was more susceptible to CT parameter variability than radiomics. Standard convolution kernel images seem to be more appropriate for imaging analysis. Further investigation with a larger sample size is needed. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-08-19 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6775016/ /pubmed/31426132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13161 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zhao, Wei
Zhang, Wei
Sun, Yingli
Ye, Yuxiang
Yang, Jiancheng
Chen, Wufei
Gao, Pan
Li, Jianying
Li, Cheng
Jin, Liang
Wang, Peijun
Hua, Yanqing
Li, Ming
Convolution kernel and iterative reconstruction affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics and deep learning in lung adenocarcinoma pathological subtypes
title Convolution kernel and iterative reconstruction affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics and deep learning in lung adenocarcinoma pathological subtypes
title_full Convolution kernel and iterative reconstruction affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics and deep learning in lung adenocarcinoma pathological subtypes
title_fullStr Convolution kernel and iterative reconstruction affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics and deep learning in lung adenocarcinoma pathological subtypes
title_full_unstemmed Convolution kernel and iterative reconstruction affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics and deep learning in lung adenocarcinoma pathological subtypes
title_short Convolution kernel and iterative reconstruction affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics and deep learning in lung adenocarcinoma pathological subtypes
title_sort convolution kernel and iterative reconstruction affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics and deep learning in lung adenocarcinoma pathological subtypes
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31426132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13161
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaowei convolutionkernelanditerativereconstructionaffectthediagnosticperformanceofradiomicsanddeeplearninginlungadenocarcinomapathologicalsubtypes
AT zhangwei convolutionkernelanditerativereconstructionaffectthediagnosticperformanceofradiomicsanddeeplearninginlungadenocarcinomapathologicalsubtypes
AT sunyingli convolutionkernelanditerativereconstructionaffectthediagnosticperformanceofradiomicsanddeeplearninginlungadenocarcinomapathologicalsubtypes
AT yeyuxiang convolutionkernelanditerativereconstructionaffectthediagnosticperformanceofradiomicsanddeeplearninginlungadenocarcinomapathologicalsubtypes
AT yangjiancheng convolutionkernelanditerativereconstructionaffectthediagnosticperformanceofradiomicsanddeeplearninginlungadenocarcinomapathologicalsubtypes
AT chenwufei convolutionkernelanditerativereconstructionaffectthediagnosticperformanceofradiomicsanddeeplearninginlungadenocarcinomapathologicalsubtypes
AT gaopan convolutionkernelanditerativereconstructionaffectthediagnosticperformanceofradiomicsanddeeplearninginlungadenocarcinomapathologicalsubtypes
AT lijianying convolutionkernelanditerativereconstructionaffectthediagnosticperformanceofradiomicsanddeeplearninginlungadenocarcinomapathologicalsubtypes
AT licheng convolutionkernelanditerativereconstructionaffectthediagnosticperformanceofradiomicsanddeeplearninginlungadenocarcinomapathologicalsubtypes
AT jinliang convolutionkernelanditerativereconstructionaffectthediagnosticperformanceofradiomicsanddeeplearninginlungadenocarcinomapathologicalsubtypes
AT wangpeijun convolutionkernelanditerativereconstructionaffectthediagnosticperformanceofradiomicsanddeeplearninginlungadenocarcinomapathologicalsubtypes
AT huayanqing convolutionkernelanditerativereconstructionaffectthediagnosticperformanceofradiomicsanddeeplearninginlungadenocarcinomapathologicalsubtypes
AT liming convolutionkernelanditerativereconstructionaffectthediagnosticperformanceofradiomicsanddeeplearninginlungadenocarcinomapathologicalsubtypes