Cargando…
How variable are the volumetric measurements from gated perfusion SPECT when a one-day stress-rest protocol is used?
BACKGROUND: Using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), an increase in left ventricular (LV) volumes or a decrease in ejection fraction (EF) from rest to stress may be clinically important. The variation in these measures between the low-dose stress acquisition and high-dose rest acquisition in a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29546491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1253-4 |
_version_ | 1783456147929300992 |
---|---|
author | Camm, C. Fielder Emery, Alexander Rose-Innes, Elizabeth Pavlitchouk, Sergei Sabharwal, Nikant Kelion, Andrew D. |
author_facet | Camm, C. Fielder Emery, Alexander Rose-Innes, Elizabeth Pavlitchouk, Sergei Sabharwal, Nikant Kelion, Andrew D. |
author_sort | Camm, C. Fielder |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), an increase in left ventricular (LV) volumes or a decrease in ejection fraction (EF) from rest to stress may be clinically important. The variation in these measures between the low-dose stress acquisition and high-dose rest acquisition in a one-day stress-rest protocol has not been established. We assessed the reproducibility of gated volumetric indices between stress and rest and the normal variation in ungated TID ratio for a one-day stress-rest (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin protocol. METHODS: Two thousand and one hundred and fifty eight (2158) (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin MPS patient studies were analyzed retrospectively. Studies were excluded for incomplete data, significant technical difficulties, or (for gated analysis but not for analysis of TID ratio) if the LV EF was > 75%. An analysis of gated data was undertaken to establish the reproducibility of ventricular volumes and EF between stress and rest scans. Ungated volume data were analyzed to determine the confidence limits of TID ratio according to ventricular volume. RESULTS: Gated data were analyzed for 621 patients without inducible hypoperfusion. Mean EF at rest was slightly higher than after stress (62.4% ± 10.3% vs 61.2% ± 10.4%, P < 0.001), and the standard deviation of the difference was 5.2% (95% CI 4.9% to 5.5%). Ungated volumes were available for 992 non-ischaemic patients. The upper 95% CI for TID ratio was 1.23. This increased from 1.20 to 1.37 between the highest and lowest deciles of rest ungated volume. CONCLUSION: Using a one-day stress-rest (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin protocol, a fall in LV EF between rest and stress of > 11.6% or a TID ratio of > 1.23 is likely to be clinically reliable. The upper limit of normal for TID ratio needs to be increased for patients with small LV chamber volumes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12350-018-1253-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6775029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67750292019-10-17 How variable are the volumetric measurements from gated perfusion SPECT when a one-day stress-rest protocol is used? Camm, C. Fielder Emery, Alexander Rose-Innes, Elizabeth Pavlitchouk, Sergei Sabharwal, Nikant Kelion, Andrew D. J Nucl Cardiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), an increase in left ventricular (LV) volumes or a decrease in ejection fraction (EF) from rest to stress may be clinically important. The variation in these measures between the low-dose stress acquisition and high-dose rest acquisition in a one-day stress-rest protocol has not been established. We assessed the reproducibility of gated volumetric indices between stress and rest and the normal variation in ungated TID ratio for a one-day stress-rest (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin protocol. METHODS: Two thousand and one hundred and fifty eight (2158) (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin MPS patient studies were analyzed retrospectively. Studies were excluded for incomplete data, significant technical difficulties, or (for gated analysis but not for analysis of TID ratio) if the LV EF was > 75%. An analysis of gated data was undertaken to establish the reproducibility of ventricular volumes and EF between stress and rest scans. Ungated volume data were analyzed to determine the confidence limits of TID ratio according to ventricular volume. RESULTS: Gated data were analyzed for 621 patients without inducible hypoperfusion. Mean EF at rest was slightly higher than after stress (62.4% ± 10.3% vs 61.2% ± 10.4%, P < 0.001), and the standard deviation of the difference was 5.2% (95% CI 4.9% to 5.5%). Ungated volumes were available for 992 non-ischaemic patients. The upper 95% CI for TID ratio was 1.23. This increased from 1.20 to 1.37 between the highest and lowest deciles of rest ungated volume. CONCLUSION: Using a one-day stress-rest (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin protocol, a fall in LV EF between rest and stress of > 11.6% or a TID ratio of > 1.23 is likely to be clinically reliable. The upper limit of normal for TID ratio needs to be increased for patients with small LV chamber volumes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12350-018-1253-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-03-15 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6775029/ /pubmed/29546491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1253-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Camm, C. Fielder Emery, Alexander Rose-Innes, Elizabeth Pavlitchouk, Sergei Sabharwal, Nikant Kelion, Andrew D. How variable are the volumetric measurements from gated perfusion SPECT when a one-day stress-rest protocol is used? |
title | How variable are the volumetric measurements from gated perfusion SPECT when a one-day stress-rest protocol is used? |
title_full | How variable are the volumetric measurements from gated perfusion SPECT when a one-day stress-rest protocol is used? |
title_fullStr | How variable are the volumetric measurements from gated perfusion SPECT when a one-day stress-rest protocol is used? |
title_full_unstemmed | How variable are the volumetric measurements from gated perfusion SPECT when a one-day stress-rest protocol is used? |
title_short | How variable are the volumetric measurements from gated perfusion SPECT when a one-day stress-rest protocol is used? |
title_sort | how variable are the volumetric measurements from gated perfusion spect when a one-day stress-rest protocol is used? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29546491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1253-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cammcfielder howvariablearethevolumetricmeasurementsfromgatedperfusionspectwhenaonedaystressrestprotocolisused AT emeryalexander howvariablearethevolumetricmeasurementsfromgatedperfusionspectwhenaonedaystressrestprotocolisused AT roseinneselizabeth howvariablearethevolumetricmeasurementsfromgatedperfusionspectwhenaonedaystressrestprotocolisused AT pavlitchouksergei howvariablearethevolumetricmeasurementsfromgatedperfusionspectwhenaonedaystressrestprotocolisused AT sabharwalnikant howvariablearethevolumetricmeasurementsfromgatedperfusionspectwhenaonedaystressrestprotocolisused AT kelionandrewd howvariablearethevolumetricmeasurementsfromgatedperfusionspectwhenaonedaystressrestprotocolisused |