Cargando…
The impact of patient sex on intensive care unit admission: a blinded randomized survey
The gender distribution in intensive care units is consistently found to be around 60% men and 40% women. This might be medically sound. Our main purpose with this study was to investigate if physicians admit men and women to the intensive care unit equally. We sought to answer this question using a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31578418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50836-3 |
_version_ | 1783456171250679808 |
---|---|
author | Zettersten, Erik Jäderling, Gabriella Larsson, Emma Bell, Max |
author_facet | Zettersten, Erik Jäderling, Gabriella Larsson, Emma Bell, Max |
author_sort | Zettersten, Erik |
collection | PubMed |
description | The gender distribution in intensive care units is consistently found to be around 60% men and 40% women. This might be medically sound. Our main purpose with this study was to investigate if physicians admit men and women to the intensive care unit equally. We sought to answer this question using a blinded randomized survey study. We used an online survey tool, with a hyperlink on European society of intensive care medicine webpage. Responders were randomized to either a critical care case Jane or a critical care case John, otherwise identical. The responders were asked if they would admit Jane/John to an intensive care unit, yes or no. Possible differences in admittance rate on the basis of the gender of the patient were analysed. In addition, we analysed if the gender of the responder affected admittance rate, regardless of the gender of the patient. 70.1% of the responders randomized to the John case opted to admit, vs. 68.3% of the responders randomized to the Jane case, p = 0.341. Regardless the gender of the patient, 70.1% of male responders opted to admit the patient, vs. 69.7% of female responders, p = 0.886. In this blinded randomized multicentre survey study, we could not demonstrate any difference in willingness to admit a patient to ICU, solely based on the gender of the patient. Patient gender as a factor for ICU admittance. A blinded randomized survey. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6775127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67751272019-10-09 The impact of patient sex on intensive care unit admission: a blinded randomized survey Zettersten, Erik Jäderling, Gabriella Larsson, Emma Bell, Max Sci Rep Article The gender distribution in intensive care units is consistently found to be around 60% men and 40% women. This might be medically sound. Our main purpose with this study was to investigate if physicians admit men and women to the intensive care unit equally. We sought to answer this question using a blinded randomized survey study. We used an online survey tool, with a hyperlink on European society of intensive care medicine webpage. Responders were randomized to either a critical care case Jane or a critical care case John, otherwise identical. The responders were asked if they would admit Jane/John to an intensive care unit, yes or no. Possible differences in admittance rate on the basis of the gender of the patient were analysed. In addition, we analysed if the gender of the responder affected admittance rate, regardless of the gender of the patient. 70.1% of the responders randomized to the John case opted to admit, vs. 68.3% of the responders randomized to the Jane case, p = 0.341. Regardless the gender of the patient, 70.1% of male responders opted to admit the patient, vs. 69.7% of female responders, p = 0.886. In this blinded randomized multicentre survey study, we could not demonstrate any difference in willingness to admit a patient to ICU, solely based on the gender of the patient. Patient gender as a factor for ICU admittance. A blinded randomized survey. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6775127/ /pubmed/31578418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50836-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Zettersten, Erik Jäderling, Gabriella Larsson, Emma Bell, Max The impact of patient sex on intensive care unit admission: a blinded randomized survey |
title | The impact of patient sex on intensive care unit admission: a blinded randomized survey |
title_full | The impact of patient sex on intensive care unit admission: a blinded randomized survey |
title_fullStr | The impact of patient sex on intensive care unit admission: a blinded randomized survey |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of patient sex on intensive care unit admission: a blinded randomized survey |
title_short | The impact of patient sex on intensive care unit admission: a blinded randomized survey |
title_sort | impact of patient sex on intensive care unit admission: a blinded randomized survey |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31578418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50836-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zetterstenerik theimpactofpatientsexonintensivecareunitadmissionablindedrandomizedsurvey AT jaderlinggabriella theimpactofpatientsexonintensivecareunitadmissionablindedrandomizedsurvey AT larssonemma theimpactofpatientsexonintensivecareunitadmissionablindedrandomizedsurvey AT bellmax theimpactofpatientsexonintensivecareunitadmissionablindedrandomizedsurvey AT zetterstenerik impactofpatientsexonintensivecareunitadmissionablindedrandomizedsurvey AT jaderlinggabriella impactofpatientsexonintensivecareunitadmissionablindedrandomizedsurvey AT larssonemma impactofpatientsexonintensivecareunitadmissionablindedrandomizedsurvey AT bellmax impactofpatientsexonintensivecareunitadmissionablindedrandomizedsurvey |