Cargando…
Reliability and Agreement of the 10-Repetition Maximum Test in Breast Cancer Survivors
The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and agreement between the test and retest of the 10-repetition maximum (10-RM) test for leg press and bench press in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Thirty-one BCS participated in this study, age 54.87 ± 5.7 years. All performed 10-RM tests and re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00918 |
_version_ | 1783456186800013312 |
---|---|
author | dos Santos, Wanderson Divino Nilo Siqueira, Gabriel Dutra de Jesus Martins, Wagner Rodrigues Vieira, Amilton Schincaglia, Raquel Machado Gentil, Paulo Vieira, Carlos Alexandre |
author_facet | dos Santos, Wanderson Divino Nilo Siqueira, Gabriel Dutra de Jesus Martins, Wagner Rodrigues Vieira, Amilton Schincaglia, Raquel Machado Gentil, Paulo Vieira, Carlos Alexandre |
author_sort | dos Santos, Wanderson Divino Nilo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and agreement between the test and retest of the 10-repetition maximum (10-RM) test for leg press and bench press in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Thirty-one BCS participated in this study, age 54.87 ± 5.7 years. All performed 10-RM tests and retests for the leg press 45° and the bench press. For reliability analyses, an intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were performed. The limits of agreement were calculated using a Bland-Altman plot with 95% CIs. For absolute and relative error of measurement, we used standard error of measurement and minimally detectable change. The result showed a high reliability for the bench press and leg press; ICC of 0.94 and 0.98, respectively. CV was <10% for both exercises. The systematic error were 1.5 kg (10%) and 6.1 (8%) for the bench press and leg press, respectively. The standard errors of measurements were 0.96 kg (6.08%) and 4.11 kg (5.27%) for the bench press and leg press, respectively. The minimally detectable changes were 2.72 kg (17.20%) and 5.62 kg (7.21%) for the bench press and leg press, respectively. In breast cancer survivors, the muscular strength measurement for the 10-RM test showed a high to very high rate of reliability and agreement, with acceptable error of measurement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6775190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67751902019-10-15 Reliability and Agreement of the 10-Repetition Maximum Test in Breast Cancer Survivors dos Santos, Wanderson Divino Nilo Siqueira, Gabriel Dutra de Jesus Martins, Wagner Rodrigues Vieira, Amilton Schincaglia, Raquel Machado Gentil, Paulo Vieira, Carlos Alexandre Front Oncol Oncology The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and agreement between the test and retest of the 10-repetition maximum (10-RM) test for leg press and bench press in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Thirty-one BCS participated in this study, age 54.87 ± 5.7 years. All performed 10-RM tests and retests for the leg press 45° and the bench press. For reliability analyses, an intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were performed. The limits of agreement were calculated using a Bland-Altman plot with 95% CIs. For absolute and relative error of measurement, we used standard error of measurement and minimally detectable change. The result showed a high reliability for the bench press and leg press; ICC of 0.94 and 0.98, respectively. CV was <10% for both exercises. The systematic error were 1.5 kg (10%) and 6.1 (8%) for the bench press and leg press, respectively. The standard errors of measurements were 0.96 kg (6.08%) and 4.11 kg (5.27%) for the bench press and leg press, respectively. The minimally detectable changes were 2.72 kg (17.20%) and 5.62 kg (7.21%) for the bench press and leg press, respectively. In breast cancer survivors, the muscular strength measurement for the 10-RM test showed a high to very high rate of reliability and agreement, with acceptable error of measurement. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6775190/ /pubmed/31616633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00918 Text en Copyright © 2019 Santos, Siqueira, Martins, Vieira, Schincaglia, Gentil and Vieira. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology dos Santos, Wanderson Divino Nilo Siqueira, Gabriel Dutra de Jesus Martins, Wagner Rodrigues Vieira, Amilton Schincaglia, Raquel Machado Gentil, Paulo Vieira, Carlos Alexandre Reliability and Agreement of the 10-Repetition Maximum Test in Breast Cancer Survivors |
title | Reliability and Agreement of the 10-Repetition Maximum Test in Breast Cancer Survivors |
title_full | Reliability and Agreement of the 10-Repetition Maximum Test in Breast Cancer Survivors |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Agreement of the 10-Repetition Maximum Test in Breast Cancer Survivors |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Agreement of the 10-Repetition Maximum Test in Breast Cancer Survivors |
title_short | Reliability and Agreement of the 10-Repetition Maximum Test in Breast Cancer Survivors |
title_sort | reliability and agreement of the 10-repetition maximum test in breast cancer survivors |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00918 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dossantoswandersondivinonilo reliabilityandagreementofthe10repetitionmaximumtestinbreastcancersurvivors AT siqueiragabrieldutradejesus reliabilityandagreementofthe10repetitionmaximumtestinbreastcancersurvivors AT martinswagnerrodrigues reliabilityandagreementofthe10repetitionmaximumtestinbreastcancersurvivors AT vieiraamilton reliabilityandagreementofthe10repetitionmaximumtestinbreastcancersurvivors AT schincagliaraquelmachado reliabilityandagreementofthe10repetitionmaximumtestinbreastcancersurvivors AT gentilpaulo reliabilityandagreementofthe10repetitionmaximumtestinbreastcancersurvivors AT vieiracarlosalexandre reliabilityandagreementofthe10repetitionmaximumtestinbreastcancersurvivors |