Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Laboratory Evidence for the Abuse Potential of Tramadol in Humans

Background: Tramadol is an opioid-analgesic that has shown epidemiological evidence of abuse. This review evaluates the evidence for tramadol abuse potential in humans. Methods: A systematic literature search for human abuse liability examinations of tramadol was conducted in September 2018 and yiel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunn, Kelly E., Bergeria, Cecilia L., Huhn, Andrew S., Strain, Eric C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616329
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00704
_version_ 1783456191474565120
author Dunn, Kelly E.
Bergeria, Cecilia L.
Huhn, Andrew S.
Strain, Eric C.
author_facet Dunn, Kelly E.
Bergeria, Cecilia L.
Huhn, Andrew S.
Strain, Eric C.
author_sort Dunn, Kelly E.
collection PubMed
description Background: Tramadol is an opioid-analgesic that has shown epidemiological evidence of abuse. This review evaluates the evidence for tramadol abuse potential in humans. Methods: A systematic literature search for human abuse liability examinations of tramadol was conducted in September 2018 and yielded 13 total studies. Studies were all within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled human laboratory comparisons of tramadol to opioid comparators. Results are organized based upon the route of tramadol administration (oral, parenteral) and the participant population (persons with and without current opioid physical dependence). Outcomes were categorized into self-report ratings of positive and negative effects, observer-ratings of effects, time course of effects, likelihood tramadol was identified as an opioid, and tramadol self-administration. Results: Results indicated the relative abuse potential of tramadol was lower than the opioids to which it was compared. Tramadol produced highest positive effect ratings when administered orally to persons with no opioid physical dependence. Relative to other opioids, it produced substantial negative ratings, generally demonstrated a slower onset of effects, and was less likely to be identified by participants as an opioid, though it did produce a higher rate of self-administration relative to other opioids in the one study reporting that outcome. Results suggest that the abuse potential of tramadol is highest when it is administered orally to non-dependent individuals, and that it likely decreases as the dose increased and when it was administered parentally or to persons with opioid physical dependence. Conclusion: Taken together, individuals may be less likely than with other opioids to escalate tramadol doses, transition from oral to parenteral routes of administration, or continue using tramadol once opioid physical dependence develops. In that way, the human abuse potential of tramadol appears to be different from and lower than other opioid analgesic medications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6775208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67752082019-10-15 A Systematic Review of Laboratory Evidence for the Abuse Potential of Tramadol in Humans Dunn, Kelly E. Bergeria, Cecilia L. Huhn, Andrew S. Strain, Eric C. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Background: Tramadol is an opioid-analgesic that has shown epidemiological evidence of abuse. This review evaluates the evidence for tramadol abuse potential in humans. Methods: A systematic literature search for human abuse liability examinations of tramadol was conducted in September 2018 and yielded 13 total studies. Studies were all within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled human laboratory comparisons of tramadol to opioid comparators. Results are organized based upon the route of tramadol administration (oral, parenteral) and the participant population (persons with and without current opioid physical dependence). Outcomes were categorized into self-report ratings of positive and negative effects, observer-ratings of effects, time course of effects, likelihood tramadol was identified as an opioid, and tramadol self-administration. Results: Results indicated the relative abuse potential of tramadol was lower than the opioids to which it was compared. Tramadol produced highest positive effect ratings when administered orally to persons with no opioid physical dependence. Relative to other opioids, it produced substantial negative ratings, generally demonstrated a slower onset of effects, and was less likely to be identified by participants as an opioid, though it did produce a higher rate of self-administration relative to other opioids in the one study reporting that outcome. Results suggest that the abuse potential of tramadol is highest when it is administered orally to non-dependent individuals, and that it likely decreases as the dose increased and when it was administered parentally or to persons with opioid physical dependence. Conclusion: Taken together, individuals may be less likely than with other opioids to escalate tramadol doses, transition from oral to parenteral routes of administration, or continue using tramadol once opioid physical dependence develops. In that way, the human abuse potential of tramadol appears to be different from and lower than other opioid analgesic medications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6775208/ /pubmed/31616329 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00704 Text en Copyright © 2019 Dunn, Bergeria, Huhn and Strain http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Dunn, Kelly E.
Bergeria, Cecilia L.
Huhn, Andrew S.
Strain, Eric C.
A Systematic Review of Laboratory Evidence for the Abuse Potential of Tramadol in Humans
title A Systematic Review of Laboratory Evidence for the Abuse Potential of Tramadol in Humans
title_full A Systematic Review of Laboratory Evidence for the Abuse Potential of Tramadol in Humans
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Laboratory Evidence for the Abuse Potential of Tramadol in Humans
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Laboratory Evidence for the Abuse Potential of Tramadol in Humans
title_short A Systematic Review of Laboratory Evidence for the Abuse Potential of Tramadol in Humans
title_sort systematic review of laboratory evidence for the abuse potential of tramadol in humans
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616329
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00704
work_keys_str_mv AT dunnkellye asystematicreviewoflaboratoryevidencefortheabusepotentialoftramadolinhumans
AT bergeriacecilial asystematicreviewoflaboratoryevidencefortheabusepotentialoftramadolinhumans
AT huhnandrews asystematicreviewoflaboratoryevidencefortheabusepotentialoftramadolinhumans
AT strainericc asystematicreviewoflaboratoryevidencefortheabusepotentialoftramadolinhumans
AT dunnkellye systematicreviewoflaboratoryevidencefortheabusepotentialoftramadolinhumans
AT bergeriacecilial systematicreviewoflaboratoryevidencefortheabusepotentialoftramadolinhumans
AT huhnandrews systematicreviewoflaboratoryevidencefortheabusepotentialoftramadolinhumans
AT strainericc systematicreviewoflaboratoryevidencefortheabusepotentialoftramadolinhumans