Cargando…

Dexamethasone-sparing regimen is an effective and safe alternative in overall antiemetic protection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: We performed a meta-analyisis to evaluate the efficacy of maintenance dexamethasone against acute or delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving moderately or highly emetic risk chemotherapy regimen. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were sear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Yan-Lin, Xie, Jia-ming, Ren, Jie, Cao, Hua, Wei, Jin-rong, Chen, Chao, Shao, Le-Ning, Jiang, Guo-Qin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31574883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017364
_version_ 1783456231980007424
author Gu, Yan-Lin
Xie, Jia-ming
Ren, Jie
Cao, Hua
Wei, Jin-rong
Chen, Chao
Shao, Le-Ning
Jiang, Guo-Qin
author_facet Gu, Yan-Lin
Xie, Jia-ming
Ren, Jie
Cao, Hua
Wei, Jin-rong
Chen, Chao
Shao, Le-Ning
Jiang, Guo-Qin
author_sort Gu, Yan-Lin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We performed a meta-analyisis to evaluate the efficacy of maintenance dexamethasone against acute or delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving moderately or highly emetic risk chemotherapy regimen. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. Data comparing maintenance dexamethasone with single-dose dexamethasone during the acute, delayed, and overall phase of CINV were extracted. Overall risk ratio (RR) was used to estimate the efficacy and adverse effects. RESULTS: Nine studies were included. In delayed phase, maintenance dexamethasone has similar efficacy to single-dose dexamethasone for no emetic episodes (RR, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–1.14), complete response (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.98–1.11), complete control (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.98–1.16), and total control (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91–1.23). In overall phase, maintenance dexamethasone has similar efficacy to single-dose dexamethasone for no emetic episodes (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94–1.11), complete response (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95 -1.09), complete control (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94–1.13), total control (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90–1.23), and no rescue medication (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.97–1.19). Maintenance dexamethasone was only superior to single-dose dexamethasone for no rescue medication during delayed phase (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01–1.21, P = .034). The incidence of hiccup was observed higher in maintenance dexamethasone group (RR = 3.16, 95% CI, 1.12–8.92). CONCLUSION: The single-dose dexamethasone regimen offers high and similar overall control of symptoms as the maintenance dexamethasone regimen in this population. Multiple-day dexamethasone was suitable for patients who used rescue medication during the delayed phase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6775367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67753672019-10-07 Dexamethasone-sparing regimen is an effective and safe alternative in overall antiemetic protection: A systematic review and meta-analysis Gu, Yan-Lin Xie, Jia-ming Ren, Jie Cao, Hua Wei, Jin-rong Chen, Chao Shao, Le-Ning Jiang, Guo-Qin Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 OBJECTIVE: We performed a meta-analyisis to evaluate the efficacy of maintenance dexamethasone against acute or delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving moderately or highly emetic risk chemotherapy regimen. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. Data comparing maintenance dexamethasone with single-dose dexamethasone during the acute, delayed, and overall phase of CINV were extracted. Overall risk ratio (RR) was used to estimate the efficacy and adverse effects. RESULTS: Nine studies were included. In delayed phase, maintenance dexamethasone has similar efficacy to single-dose dexamethasone for no emetic episodes (RR, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–1.14), complete response (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.98–1.11), complete control (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.98–1.16), and total control (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91–1.23). In overall phase, maintenance dexamethasone has similar efficacy to single-dose dexamethasone for no emetic episodes (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94–1.11), complete response (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95 -1.09), complete control (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94–1.13), total control (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90–1.23), and no rescue medication (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.97–1.19). Maintenance dexamethasone was only superior to single-dose dexamethasone for no rescue medication during delayed phase (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01–1.21, P = .034). The incidence of hiccup was observed higher in maintenance dexamethasone group (RR = 3.16, 95% CI, 1.12–8.92). CONCLUSION: The single-dose dexamethasone regimen offers high and similar overall control of symptoms as the maintenance dexamethasone regimen in this population. Multiple-day dexamethasone was suitable for patients who used rescue medication during the delayed phase. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6775367/ /pubmed/31574883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017364 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Gu, Yan-Lin
Xie, Jia-ming
Ren, Jie
Cao, Hua
Wei, Jin-rong
Chen, Chao
Shao, Le-Ning
Jiang, Guo-Qin
Dexamethasone-sparing regimen is an effective and safe alternative in overall antiemetic protection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Dexamethasone-sparing regimen is an effective and safe alternative in overall antiemetic protection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Dexamethasone-sparing regimen is an effective and safe alternative in overall antiemetic protection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Dexamethasone-sparing regimen is an effective and safe alternative in overall antiemetic protection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Dexamethasone-sparing regimen is an effective and safe alternative in overall antiemetic protection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Dexamethasone-sparing regimen is an effective and safe alternative in overall antiemetic protection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort dexamethasone-sparing regimen is an effective and safe alternative in overall antiemetic protection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31574883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017364
work_keys_str_mv AT guyanlin dexamethasonesparingregimenisaneffectiveandsafealternativeinoverallantiemeticprotectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiejiaming dexamethasonesparingregimenisaneffectiveandsafealternativeinoverallantiemeticprotectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT renjie dexamethasonesparingregimenisaneffectiveandsafealternativeinoverallantiemeticprotectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caohua dexamethasonesparingregimenisaneffectiveandsafealternativeinoverallantiemeticprotectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weijinrong dexamethasonesparingregimenisaneffectiveandsafealternativeinoverallantiemeticprotectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenchao dexamethasonesparingregimenisaneffectiveandsafealternativeinoverallantiemeticprotectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shaolening dexamethasonesparingregimenisaneffectiveandsafealternativeinoverallantiemeticprotectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangguoqin dexamethasonesparingregimenisaneffectiveandsafealternativeinoverallantiemeticprotectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis