Cargando…

Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance and computed tomography colonography for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the recommended procedure for colorectal cancer (CRC), but majority of the patients were diagnosed with advanced or metastatic CRC. Currently, there were inconsistent results about the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) and computed tomography...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Yanjun, Wang, Jing, Lv, Hairong, Xue, Yongjie, Jia, Rongrong, Liu, Ge, Bai, Weixian, Wu, Yi, Zhang, Lang, Yang, Junle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31574825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017187
_version_ 1783456242478350336
author Gao, Yanjun
Wang, Jing
Lv, Hairong
Xue, Yongjie
Jia, Rongrong
Liu, Ge
Bai, Weixian
Wu, Yi
Zhang, Lang
Yang, Junle
author_facet Gao, Yanjun
Wang, Jing
Lv, Hairong
Xue, Yongjie
Jia, Rongrong
Liu, Ge
Bai, Weixian
Wu, Yi
Zhang, Lang
Yang, Junle
author_sort Gao, Yanjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the recommended procedure for colorectal cancer (CRC), but majority of the patients were diagnosed with advanced or metastatic CRC. Currently, there were inconsistent results about the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) and computed tomography colonography (CTC) in early CRC diagnosis. Our study conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic value of MRC and CTC for CRC surveillance. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library to select relevant studies. The summary sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic value of MRC and CTC, respectively. RESULT: Twenty-five studies including 2985 individuals were selected in the final analysis. Eight studies evaluated the diagnostic value of MRC, and 17 studies assessed CTC. The summary sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC in MRC for early detection of CRC were 0.98 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.80–1.00), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.85–0.97), 15.48 (95% CI: 6.30–38.04), 0.02 (95% CI: 0.00–0.25), 115.09 (95% CI: 15.37–862.01), and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99), respectively. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC of CTC for diagnosing CRC were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.88–0.99), 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99–1.00), 154.11 (95% CI: 67.81–350.22), 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01–0.13), 642.51 (95% CI: 145.05–2846.02), and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.99–1.00). No significant differences were found between MRC and CTC for DOR in all the subsets. CONCLUSION: The findings of meta-analysis indicated that MRC and CTC have higher diagnostic values for early CRC diagnosis. However, the DOR for diagnosing CRC between MRC and CTC showed no significance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6775409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67754092019-10-07 Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance and computed tomography colonography for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Gao, Yanjun Wang, Jing Lv, Hairong Xue, Yongjie Jia, Rongrong Liu, Ge Bai, Weixian Wu, Yi Zhang, Lang Yang, Junle Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the recommended procedure for colorectal cancer (CRC), but majority of the patients were diagnosed with advanced or metastatic CRC. Currently, there were inconsistent results about the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) and computed tomography colonography (CTC) in early CRC diagnosis. Our study conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic value of MRC and CTC for CRC surveillance. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library to select relevant studies. The summary sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic value of MRC and CTC, respectively. RESULT: Twenty-five studies including 2985 individuals were selected in the final analysis. Eight studies evaluated the diagnostic value of MRC, and 17 studies assessed CTC. The summary sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC in MRC for early detection of CRC were 0.98 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.80–1.00), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.85–0.97), 15.48 (95% CI: 6.30–38.04), 0.02 (95% CI: 0.00–0.25), 115.09 (95% CI: 15.37–862.01), and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99), respectively. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC of CTC for diagnosing CRC were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.88–0.99), 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99–1.00), 154.11 (95% CI: 67.81–350.22), 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01–0.13), 642.51 (95% CI: 145.05–2846.02), and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.99–1.00). No significant differences were found between MRC and CTC for DOR in all the subsets. CONCLUSION: The findings of meta-analysis indicated that MRC and CTC have higher diagnostic values for early CRC diagnosis. However, the DOR for diagnosing CRC between MRC and CTC showed no significance. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6775409/ /pubmed/31574825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017187 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 4500
Gao, Yanjun
Wang, Jing
Lv, Hairong
Xue, Yongjie
Jia, Rongrong
Liu, Ge
Bai, Weixian
Wu, Yi
Zhang, Lang
Yang, Junle
Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance and computed tomography colonography for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance and computed tomography colonography for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance and computed tomography colonography for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance and computed tomography colonography for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance and computed tomography colonography for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance and computed tomography colonography for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic value of magnetic resonance and computed tomography colonography for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31574825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017187
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoyanjun diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceandcomputedtomographycolonographyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangjing diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceandcomputedtomographycolonographyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lvhairong diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceandcomputedtomographycolonographyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xueyongjie diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceandcomputedtomographycolonographyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiarongrong diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceandcomputedtomographycolonographyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuge diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceandcomputedtomographycolonographyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baiweixian diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceandcomputedtomographycolonographyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuyi diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceandcomputedtomographycolonographyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanglang diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceandcomputedtomographycolonographyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangjunle diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceandcomputedtomographycolonographyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis