Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (IRI)-based and oxaliplatin (OXA)-based regimens are available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several studies have published inconsistent results in their comparisons of the efficacy and toxicity of IRI ± bevacizumab and OXA ± bevacizumab. This meta-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Jiali, Chen, Yuetong, Gong, Yang, Wei, Jingsun, Cui, Xiaowen, Yu, Hualin, Zhao, Wenjing, Gu, Dongying, Chen, Jinfei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31574891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017384
_version_ 1783456248325210112
author Dai, Jiali
Chen, Yuetong
Gong, Yang
Wei, Jingsun
Cui, Xiaowen
Yu, Hualin
Zhao, Wenjing
Gu, Dongying
Chen, Jinfei
author_facet Dai, Jiali
Chen, Yuetong
Gong, Yang
Wei, Jingsun
Cui, Xiaowen
Yu, Hualin
Zhao, Wenjing
Gu, Dongying
Chen, Jinfei
author_sort Dai, Jiali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (IRI)-based and oxaliplatin (OXA)-based regimens are available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several studies have published inconsistent results in their comparisons of the efficacy and toxicity of IRI ± bevacizumab and OXA ± bevacizumab. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these 2 regimens in patients with mCRC. METHODS: We searched several databases to identify relevant studies, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). The secondary comparisons were overall response rate (ORR) and toxicity. In addition, the hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) values with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted from these studies. RESULTS: Pooled data of 13 studies demonstrated no significant differences in OS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86–1.08, P = .53) and TTP (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72–1.08, P = .24) between the 2 groups. However, the ORR (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78–0.97, P = .02) was clearly improved in the OXA ± bevacizumab arm. Higher incidences of grade 3/4 nausea (RR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.28–2.07, P < .001), vomiting (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.09–1.81, P = .01), diarrhea (RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.23–1.70, P < .001), and anemia (RR = 4.13, 95% CI: 2.75–6.22, P < .001) were observed in the IRI group. However, the incidences of grade 3/4 neutropenia (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.68–0.83, P < .001), thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26–0.73, P = .002), and paresthesia/neurological disturbances (RR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.02–0.07, P < .001) were higher in the OXA group. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirmed that the OXA ± bevacizumab regimen as a maintenance therapy significantly improved the ORR in patients with mCRC. Exhibiting strong efficacy and safety, the OXA and OXA plus bevacizumab regimens are preferred as first-line treatments for mCRC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6775432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67754322019-10-07 The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis Dai, Jiali Chen, Yuetong Gong, Yang Wei, Jingsun Cui, Xiaowen Yu, Hualin Zhao, Wenjing Gu, Dongying Chen, Jinfei Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (IRI)-based and oxaliplatin (OXA)-based regimens are available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several studies have published inconsistent results in their comparisons of the efficacy and toxicity of IRI ± bevacizumab and OXA ± bevacizumab. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these 2 regimens in patients with mCRC. METHODS: We searched several databases to identify relevant studies, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). The secondary comparisons were overall response rate (ORR) and toxicity. In addition, the hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) values with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted from these studies. RESULTS: Pooled data of 13 studies demonstrated no significant differences in OS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86–1.08, P = .53) and TTP (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72–1.08, P = .24) between the 2 groups. However, the ORR (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78–0.97, P = .02) was clearly improved in the OXA ± bevacizumab arm. Higher incidences of grade 3/4 nausea (RR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.28–2.07, P < .001), vomiting (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.09–1.81, P = .01), diarrhea (RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.23–1.70, P < .001), and anemia (RR = 4.13, 95% CI: 2.75–6.22, P < .001) were observed in the IRI group. However, the incidences of grade 3/4 neutropenia (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.68–0.83, P < .001), thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26–0.73, P = .002), and paresthesia/neurological disturbances (RR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.02–0.07, P < .001) were higher in the OXA group. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirmed that the OXA ± bevacizumab regimen as a maintenance therapy significantly improved the ORR in patients with mCRC. Exhibiting strong efficacy and safety, the OXA and OXA plus bevacizumab regimens are preferred as first-line treatments for mCRC. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6775432/ /pubmed/31574891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017384 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Dai, Jiali
Chen, Yuetong
Gong, Yang
Wei, Jingsun
Cui, Xiaowen
Yu, Hualin
Zhao, Wenjing
Gu, Dongying
Chen, Jinfei
The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
title The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31574891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017384
work_keys_str_mv AT daijiali theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT chenyuetong theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT gongyang theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT weijingsun theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT cuixiaowen theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT yuhualin theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT zhaowenjing theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT gudongying theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT chenjinfei theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT daijiali efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT chenyuetong efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT gongyang efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT weijingsun efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT cuixiaowen efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT yuhualin efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT zhaowenjing efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT gudongying efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis
AT chenjinfei efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis