Cargando…
The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (IRI)-based and oxaliplatin (OXA)-based regimens are available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several studies have published inconsistent results in their comparisons of the efficacy and toxicity of IRI ± bevacizumab and OXA ± bevacizumab. This meta-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31574891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017384 |
_version_ | 1783456248325210112 |
---|---|
author | Dai, Jiali Chen, Yuetong Gong, Yang Wei, Jingsun Cui, Xiaowen Yu, Hualin Zhao, Wenjing Gu, Dongying Chen, Jinfei |
author_facet | Dai, Jiali Chen, Yuetong Gong, Yang Wei, Jingsun Cui, Xiaowen Yu, Hualin Zhao, Wenjing Gu, Dongying Chen, Jinfei |
author_sort | Dai, Jiali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (IRI)-based and oxaliplatin (OXA)-based regimens are available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several studies have published inconsistent results in their comparisons of the efficacy and toxicity of IRI ± bevacizumab and OXA ± bevacizumab. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these 2 regimens in patients with mCRC. METHODS: We searched several databases to identify relevant studies, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). The secondary comparisons were overall response rate (ORR) and toxicity. In addition, the hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) values with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted from these studies. RESULTS: Pooled data of 13 studies demonstrated no significant differences in OS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86–1.08, P = .53) and TTP (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72–1.08, P = .24) between the 2 groups. However, the ORR (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78–0.97, P = .02) was clearly improved in the OXA ± bevacizumab arm. Higher incidences of grade 3/4 nausea (RR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.28–2.07, P < .001), vomiting (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.09–1.81, P = .01), diarrhea (RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.23–1.70, P < .001), and anemia (RR = 4.13, 95% CI: 2.75–6.22, P < .001) were observed in the IRI group. However, the incidences of grade 3/4 neutropenia (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.68–0.83, P < .001), thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26–0.73, P = .002), and paresthesia/neurological disturbances (RR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.02–0.07, P < .001) were higher in the OXA group. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirmed that the OXA ± bevacizumab regimen as a maintenance therapy significantly improved the ORR in patients with mCRC. Exhibiting strong efficacy and safety, the OXA and OXA plus bevacizumab regimens are preferred as first-line treatments for mCRC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6775432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67754322019-10-07 The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis Dai, Jiali Chen, Yuetong Gong, Yang Wei, Jingsun Cui, Xiaowen Yu, Hualin Zhao, Wenjing Gu, Dongying Chen, Jinfei Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (IRI)-based and oxaliplatin (OXA)-based regimens are available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several studies have published inconsistent results in their comparisons of the efficacy and toxicity of IRI ± bevacizumab and OXA ± bevacizumab. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these 2 regimens in patients with mCRC. METHODS: We searched several databases to identify relevant studies, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). The secondary comparisons were overall response rate (ORR) and toxicity. In addition, the hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) values with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted from these studies. RESULTS: Pooled data of 13 studies demonstrated no significant differences in OS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86–1.08, P = .53) and TTP (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72–1.08, P = .24) between the 2 groups. However, the ORR (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78–0.97, P = .02) was clearly improved in the OXA ± bevacizumab arm. Higher incidences of grade 3/4 nausea (RR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.28–2.07, P < .001), vomiting (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.09–1.81, P = .01), diarrhea (RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.23–1.70, P < .001), and anemia (RR = 4.13, 95% CI: 2.75–6.22, P < .001) were observed in the IRI group. However, the incidences of grade 3/4 neutropenia (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.68–0.83, P < .001), thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26–0.73, P = .002), and paresthesia/neurological disturbances (RR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.02–0.07, P < .001) were higher in the OXA group. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirmed that the OXA ± bevacizumab regimen as a maintenance therapy significantly improved the ORR in patients with mCRC. Exhibiting strong efficacy and safety, the OXA and OXA plus bevacizumab regimens are preferred as first-line treatments for mCRC. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6775432/ /pubmed/31574891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017384 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5700 Dai, Jiali Chen, Yuetong Gong, Yang Wei, Jingsun Cui, Xiaowen Yu, Hualin Zhao, Wenjing Gu, Dongying Chen, Jinfei The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis |
title | The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_full | The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_short | The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31574891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daijiali theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT chenyuetong theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT gongyang theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT weijingsun theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT cuixiaowen theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT yuhualin theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT zhaowenjing theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT gudongying theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT chenjinfei theefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT daijiali efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT chenyuetong efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT gongyang efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT weijingsun efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT cuixiaowen efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT yuhualin efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT zhaowenjing efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT gudongying efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis AT chenjinfei efficacyandsafetyofirinotecanbevacizumabcomparedwithoxaliplatinbevacizumabformetastaticcolorectalcancerametaanalysis |