Cargando…
Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study
Continuous epidural block (CEB) is a popular clinical method for controlling postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). However, the long-term effects of CEB on PHN have not yet been established. This study aimed to confirm the clinical efficacy of epidural electrical stimulation catheters in CEB to manage PHN....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31574800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017026 |
_version_ | 1783456249536315392 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Chung Hun Choi, Sang Sik Lee, Mi Kyoung Lee, Yeon Joo Lee, Mido Park, Jong Sun |
author_facet | Lee, Chung Hun Choi, Sang Sik Lee, Mi Kyoung Lee, Yeon Joo Lee, Mido Park, Jong Sun |
author_sort | Lee, Chung Hun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Continuous epidural block (CEB) is a popular clinical method for controlling postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). However, the long-term effects of CEB on PHN have not yet been established. This study aimed to confirm the clinical efficacy of epidural electrical stimulation catheters in CEB to manage PHN. Patients were classified into 2 groups: those with subacute PHN, between 30 and 180 days after the onset of the rash; and those with chronic PHN, over 180 days after the onset of the rash. On the basis of the type of catheter used, the patients were further divided into the following 2 groups: the esopocan group, in which the site of herpes zoster infection was confirmed using a contrast medium alone; and the epistim group, in which an additional method of electrical stimulation through a guide-wire in the catheter was used for detecting the site affected by herpes. Clinical efficacy was assessed with a numerical rating scale immediately 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure. We also investigated whether additional interventional treatment was necessitated because of insufficient pain control during the 6-month follow-up. We examined 88 patients. In the subacute PHN period, the numerical rating scale score was significantly lower in the epistim group than in the esopocan group until 6 months. In the chronic PHN period, no significant differences in the numerical rating scale scores were observed between the 2 groups until 6 months. In the subacute PHN period, the adjusted odds ratio for other interventional procedures within 6 months in the esopocan group versus the epistim group was 2.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83–8.09, P = .10), and in the chronic PHN period, it was 1.31 (95% CI 0.11–5.46, P = .79). Epidural drug administration to specific segments using electrical stimulation catheters may be more useful in mitigating zoster-associated pain in subacute PHN. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6775437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67754372019-10-07 Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study Lee, Chung Hun Choi, Sang Sik Lee, Mi Kyoung Lee, Yeon Joo Lee, Mido Park, Jong Sun Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 Continuous epidural block (CEB) is a popular clinical method for controlling postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). However, the long-term effects of CEB on PHN have not yet been established. This study aimed to confirm the clinical efficacy of epidural electrical stimulation catheters in CEB to manage PHN. Patients were classified into 2 groups: those with subacute PHN, between 30 and 180 days after the onset of the rash; and those with chronic PHN, over 180 days after the onset of the rash. On the basis of the type of catheter used, the patients were further divided into the following 2 groups: the esopocan group, in which the site of herpes zoster infection was confirmed using a contrast medium alone; and the epistim group, in which an additional method of electrical stimulation through a guide-wire in the catheter was used for detecting the site affected by herpes. Clinical efficacy was assessed with a numerical rating scale immediately 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure. We also investigated whether additional interventional treatment was necessitated because of insufficient pain control during the 6-month follow-up. We examined 88 patients. In the subacute PHN period, the numerical rating scale score was significantly lower in the epistim group than in the esopocan group until 6 months. In the chronic PHN period, no significant differences in the numerical rating scale scores were observed between the 2 groups until 6 months. In the subacute PHN period, the adjusted odds ratio for other interventional procedures within 6 months in the esopocan group versus the epistim group was 2.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83–8.09, P = .10), and in the chronic PHN period, it was 1.31 (95% CI 0.11–5.46, P = .79). Epidural drug administration to specific segments using electrical stimulation catheters may be more useful in mitigating zoster-associated pain in subacute PHN. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6775437/ /pubmed/31574800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017026 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3300 Lee, Chung Hun Choi, Sang Sik Lee, Mi Kyoung Lee, Yeon Joo Lee, Mido Park, Jong Sun Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study |
title | Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study |
title_full | Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study |
title_short | Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: a retrospective study |
topic | 3300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31574800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leechunghun comparisonoftheefficacyofcontinuousepiduralblockwithepiduralelectricalstimulationandconventionalcontinuousepiduralblockformanagementofzosterassociatedpainbeyondtheacutephasearetrospectivestudy AT choisangsik comparisonoftheefficacyofcontinuousepiduralblockwithepiduralelectricalstimulationandconventionalcontinuousepiduralblockformanagementofzosterassociatedpainbeyondtheacutephasearetrospectivestudy AT leemikyoung comparisonoftheefficacyofcontinuousepiduralblockwithepiduralelectricalstimulationandconventionalcontinuousepiduralblockformanagementofzosterassociatedpainbeyondtheacutephasearetrospectivestudy AT leeyeonjoo comparisonoftheefficacyofcontinuousepiduralblockwithepiduralelectricalstimulationandconventionalcontinuousepiduralblockformanagementofzosterassociatedpainbeyondtheacutephasearetrospectivestudy AT leemido comparisonoftheefficacyofcontinuousepiduralblockwithepiduralelectricalstimulationandconventionalcontinuousepiduralblockformanagementofzosterassociatedpainbeyondtheacutephasearetrospectivestudy AT parkjongsun comparisonoftheefficacyofcontinuousepiduralblockwithepiduralelectricalstimulationandconventionalcontinuousepiduralblockformanagementofzosterassociatedpainbeyondtheacutephasearetrospectivestudy |