Cargando…

Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study

Continuous epidural block (CEB) is a popular clinical method for controlling postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). However, the long-term effects of CEB on PHN have not yet been established. This study aimed to confirm the clinical efficacy of epidural electrical stimulation catheters in CEB to manage PHN....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Chung Hun, Choi, Sang Sik, Lee, Mi Kyoung, Lee, Yeon Joo, Lee, Mido, Park, Jong Sun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31574800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017026
_version_ 1783456249536315392
author Lee, Chung Hun
Choi, Sang Sik
Lee, Mi Kyoung
Lee, Yeon Joo
Lee, Mido
Park, Jong Sun
author_facet Lee, Chung Hun
Choi, Sang Sik
Lee, Mi Kyoung
Lee, Yeon Joo
Lee, Mido
Park, Jong Sun
author_sort Lee, Chung Hun
collection PubMed
description Continuous epidural block (CEB) is a popular clinical method for controlling postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). However, the long-term effects of CEB on PHN have not yet been established. This study aimed to confirm the clinical efficacy of epidural electrical stimulation catheters in CEB to manage PHN. Patients were classified into 2 groups: those with subacute PHN, between 30 and 180 days after the onset of the rash; and those with chronic PHN, over 180 days after the onset of the rash. On the basis of the type of catheter used, the patients were further divided into the following 2 groups: the esopocan group, in which the site of herpes zoster infection was confirmed using a contrast medium alone; and the epistim group, in which an additional method of electrical stimulation through a guide-wire in the catheter was used for detecting the site affected by herpes. Clinical efficacy was assessed with a numerical rating scale immediately 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure. We also investigated whether additional interventional treatment was necessitated because of insufficient pain control during the 6-month follow-up. We examined 88 patients. In the subacute PHN period, the numerical rating scale score was significantly lower in the epistim group than in the esopocan group until 6 months. In the chronic PHN period, no significant differences in the numerical rating scale scores were observed between the 2 groups until 6 months. In the subacute PHN period, the adjusted odds ratio for other interventional procedures within 6 months in the esopocan group versus the epistim group was 2.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83–8.09, P = .10), and in the chronic PHN period, it was 1.31 (95% CI 0.11–5.46, P = .79). Epidural drug administration to specific segments using electrical stimulation catheters may be more useful in mitigating zoster-associated pain in subacute PHN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6775437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67754372019-10-07 Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study Lee, Chung Hun Choi, Sang Sik Lee, Mi Kyoung Lee, Yeon Joo Lee, Mido Park, Jong Sun Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 Continuous epidural block (CEB) is a popular clinical method for controlling postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). However, the long-term effects of CEB on PHN have not yet been established. This study aimed to confirm the clinical efficacy of epidural electrical stimulation catheters in CEB to manage PHN. Patients were classified into 2 groups: those with subacute PHN, between 30 and 180 days after the onset of the rash; and those with chronic PHN, over 180 days after the onset of the rash. On the basis of the type of catheter used, the patients were further divided into the following 2 groups: the esopocan group, in which the site of herpes zoster infection was confirmed using a contrast medium alone; and the epistim group, in which an additional method of electrical stimulation through a guide-wire in the catheter was used for detecting the site affected by herpes. Clinical efficacy was assessed with a numerical rating scale immediately 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure. We also investigated whether additional interventional treatment was necessitated because of insufficient pain control during the 6-month follow-up. We examined 88 patients. In the subacute PHN period, the numerical rating scale score was significantly lower in the epistim group than in the esopocan group until 6 months. In the chronic PHN period, no significant differences in the numerical rating scale scores were observed between the 2 groups until 6 months. In the subacute PHN period, the adjusted odds ratio for other interventional procedures within 6 months in the esopocan group versus the epistim group was 2.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83–8.09, P = .10), and in the chronic PHN period, it was 1.31 (95% CI 0.11–5.46, P = .79). Epidural drug administration to specific segments using electrical stimulation catheters may be more useful in mitigating zoster-associated pain in subacute PHN. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6775437/ /pubmed/31574800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017026 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 3300
Lee, Chung Hun
Choi, Sang Sik
Lee, Mi Kyoung
Lee, Yeon Joo
Lee, Mido
Park, Jong Sun
Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study
title Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study
title_full Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study
title_short Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study
title_sort comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: a retrospective study
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31574800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017026
work_keys_str_mv AT leechunghun comparisonoftheefficacyofcontinuousepiduralblockwithepiduralelectricalstimulationandconventionalcontinuousepiduralblockformanagementofzosterassociatedpainbeyondtheacutephasearetrospectivestudy
AT choisangsik comparisonoftheefficacyofcontinuousepiduralblockwithepiduralelectricalstimulationandconventionalcontinuousepiduralblockformanagementofzosterassociatedpainbeyondtheacutephasearetrospectivestudy
AT leemikyoung comparisonoftheefficacyofcontinuousepiduralblockwithepiduralelectricalstimulationandconventionalcontinuousepiduralblockformanagementofzosterassociatedpainbeyondtheacutephasearetrospectivestudy
AT leeyeonjoo comparisonoftheefficacyofcontinuousepiduralblockwithepiduralelectricalstimulationandconventionalcontinuousepiduralblockformanagementofzosterassociatedpainbeyondtheacutephasearetrospectivestudy
AT leemido comparisonoftheefficacyofcontinuousepiduralblockwithepiduralelectricalstimulationandconventionalcontinuousepiduralblockformanagementofzosterassociatedpainbeyondtheacutephasearetrospectivestudy
AT parkjongsun comparisonoftheefficacyofcontinuousepiduralblockwithepiduralelectricalstimulationandconventionalcontinuousepiduralblockformanagementofzosterassociatedpainbeyondtheacutephasearetrospectivestudy