Cargando…

A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Infusion for Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Recovery Characteristics in Laparoscopic Surgeries

BACKGROUND: Creation of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgeries with carbondioxide to intra-abdominal pressures higher than 10 mmHg induces significant alterations of hemodynamics. To counteract, propofol or dexmedetomidine was compared and postoperative recovery assessed. AIMS: The aim of this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janardhana, Vasantha Kumar, Thimmaiah, Vijayashree
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31602067
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_8_19
_version_ 1783456329600335872
author Janardhana, Vasantha Kumar
Thimmaiah, Vijayashree
author_facet Janardhana, Vasantha Kumar
Thimmaiah, Vijayashree
author_sort Janardhana, Vasantha Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Creation of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgeries with carbondioxide to intra-abdominal pressures higher than 10 mmHg induces significant alterations of hemodynamics. To counteract, propofol or dexmedetomidine was compared and postoperative recovery assessed. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of standard dose of propofol versus low-dose dexmedetomidine as infusions to limit hemodynamic instability with pneumoperitoneum and facilitate recovery. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, single-blind, comparative study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients between 18 and 60 years belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class 1 and 2 scheduled for laparoscopic surgeries were randomly divided – Group D: To receive dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg over 10 min before and 0.2 μg/kg/h infusion after intubation till the end of pneumoperitoneum and Group P: To receive propofol 100 μg/kg/min after intubation till the end of pneumoperitoneum. Variables such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded at baseline, preinduction, after loading dose of dexmedetomidine, postinduction, postintubation, at pneumoperitoneum, every 15 min till the end of surgery, at extubation, and postoperatively for 2 h monitored with Ramsay Sedation Scale and modified Aldrete's score. RESULTS: Hemodynamic stability was better maintained in Group D than Group P with significant attenuation of hemodynamic stress response to pneumoperitoneum in terms of HR (3% decrease vs. 18% increase), SBP (5% decrease vs. 12% increase), DBP (2%increase vs. 16% increase), and MAP (4% decrease vs. 7% increase). Postoperatively, significant sedation was noted till 90 min in Group D and recovery was better in Group P. CONCLUSION: With doses of test drug infusion used, there is better attenuation of hemodynamic stress response to pneumoperitoneum with dexmedetomidine and faster recovery with propofol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6775828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67758282019-10-10 A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Infusion for Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Recovery Characteristics in Laparoscopic Surgeries Janardhana, Vasantha Kumar Thimmaiah, Vijayashree Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Creation of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgeries with carbondioxide to intra-abdominal pressures higher than 10 mmHg induces significant alterations of hemodynamics. To counteract, propofol or dexmedetomidine was compared and postoperative recovery assessed. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of standard dose of propofol versus low-dose dexmedetomidine as infusions to limit hemodynamic instability with pneumoperitoneum and facilitate recovery. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, single-blind, comparative study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients between 18 and 60 years belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class 1 and 2 scheduled for laparoscopic surgeries were randomly divided – Group D: To receive dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg over 10 min before and 0.2 μg/kg/h infusion after intubation till the end of pneumoperitoneum and Group P: To receive propofol 100 μg/kg/min after intubation till the end of pneumoperitoneum. Variables such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded at baseline, preinduction, after loading dose of dexmedetomidine, postinduction, postintubation, at pneumoperitoneum, every 15 min till the end of surgery, at extubation, and postoperatively for 2 h monitored with Ramsay Sedation Scale and modified Aldrete's score. RESULTS: Hemodynamic stability was better maintained in Group D than Group P with significant attenuation of hemodynamic stress response to pneumoperitoneum in terms of HR (3% decrease vs. 18% increase), SBP (5% decrease vs. 12% increase), DBP (2%increase vs. 16% increase), and MAP (4% decrease vs. 7% increase). Postoperatively, significant sedation was noted till 90 min in Group D and recovery was better in Group P. CONCLUSION: With doses of test drug infusion used, there is better attenuation of hemodynamic stress response to pneumoperitoneum with dexmedetomidine and faster recovery with propofol. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6775828/ /pubmed/31602067 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_8_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Janardhana, Vasantha Kumar
Thimmaiah, Vijayashree
A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Infusion for Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Recovery Characteristics in Laparoscopic Surgeries
title A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Infusion for Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Recovery Characteristics in Laparoscopic Surgeries
title_full A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Infusion for Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Recovery Characteristics in Laparoscopic Surgeries
title_fullStr A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Infusion for Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Recovery Characteristics in Laparoscopic Surgeries
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Infusion for Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Recovery Characteristics in Laparoscopic Surgeries
title_short A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Infusion for Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Recovery Characteristics in Laparoscopic Surgeries
title_sort prospective, randomized, single-blind, comparative study of dexmedetomidine and propofol infusion for intraoperative hemodynamics and recovery characteristics in laparoscopic surgeries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31602067
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_8_19
work_keys_str_mv AT janardhanavasanthakumar aprospectiverandomizedsingleblindcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineandpropofolinfusionforintraoperativehemodynamicsandrecoverycharacteristicsinlaparoscopicsurgeries
AT thimmaiahvijayashree aprospectiverandomizedsingleblindcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineandpropofolinfusionforintraoperativehemodynamicsandrecoverycharacteristicsinlaparoscopicsurgeries
AT janardhanavasanthakumar prospectiverandomizedsingleblindcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineandpropofolinfusionforintraoperativehemodynamicsandrecoverycharacteristicsinlaparoscopicsurgeries
AT thimmaiahvijayashree prospectiverandomizedsingleblindcomparativestudyofdexmedetomidineandpropofolinfusionforintraoperativehemodynamicsandrecoverycharacteristicsinlaparoscopicsurgeries