Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Pregabalin, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination on the Hemodynamic Response and Anesthetic Requirements in Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Prospective Study

BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of premedication with dexmedetomidine, pregabalin, and dexmedetomidine-pregabalin combination for attenuating the haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation and pneumoperitoneum (primary outcome), and for reducing anaesthetic requ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vijayan, Naveen K., Talwar, Vandana, Dayal, Madhu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31602071
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_86_19
_version_ 1783456334478311424
author Vijayan, Naveen K.
Talwar, Vandana
Dayal, Madhu
author_facet Vijayan, Naveen K.
Talwar, Vandana
Dayal, Madhu
author_sort Vijayan, Naveen K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of premedication with dexmedetomidine, pregabalin, and dexmedetomidine-pregabalin combination for attenuating the haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation and pneumoperitoneum (primary outcome), and for reducing anaesthetic requirement (secondary outcome) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Ninety ASA physical status classes I-II patients, between 18 to 65 years of age, of either sex, scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this randomised double blind study. Morbidly obese patients and those with history of hypertension, cardiac, renal, hepatic, endocrine or pulmonary dysfunction were excluded. Patients were randomized to three groups – Group P- received oral pregabalin (150 mg) one hour before induction and 100 mL of i.v normal saline (0.9%) over 10 minutes, 10 minutes before induction; Group D- received i.v dexmedetomidine (1 μg.kg(−1)) prepared in 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline and given over 10 minutes, 10 minutes before induction, and an oral placebo tablet one hour before induction; and Group C-received a combination of oral pregabalin 75 mg one hour before induction, and IV dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg.kg(−1)) prepared in 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline over 10 minutes, 10 minutes before induction. RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine significantly attenuated the stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation and pneumoperitoneum and reduced anaesthetic requirement as compared to the other two groups. Dexmedetomidine was associated with significantly lower mean arterial pressures and higher sedation score in the preoperative and postoperative period and significantly lower heart rate and arterial pressures and reduced anaesthetic requirement in the intraoperative period as compared to the other groups. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine is a valuable adjunct to the technique of balanced anaesthesia for maintaining haemodynamic stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6775847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67758472019-10-10 Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Pregabalin, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination on the Hemodynamic Response and Anesthetic Requirements in Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Prospective Study Vijayan, Naveen K. Talwar, Vandana Dayal, Madhu Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of premedication with dexmedetomidine, pregabalin, and dexmedetomidine-pregabalin combination for attenuating the haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation and pneumoperitoneum (primary outcome), and for reducing anaesthetic requirement (secondary outcome) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Ninety ASA physical status classes I-II patients, between 18 to 65 years of age, of either sex, scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this randomised double blind study. Morbidly obese patients and those with history of hypertension, cardiac, renal, hepatic, endocrine or pulmonary dysfunction were excluded. Patients were randomized to three groups – Group P- received oral pregabalin (150 mg) one hour before induction and 100 mL of i.v normal saline (0.9%) over 10 minutes, 10 minutes before induction; Group D- received i.v dexmedetomidine (1 μg.kg(−1)) prepared in 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline and given over 10 minutes, 10 minutes before induction, and an oral placebo tablet one hour before induction; and Group C-received a combination of oral pregabalin 75 mg one hour before induction, and IV dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg.kg(−1)) prepared in 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline over 10 minutes, 10 minutes before induction. RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine significantly attenuated the stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation and pneumoperitoneum and reduced anaesthetic requirement as compared to the other two groups. Dexmedetomidine was associated with significantly lower mean arterial pressures and higher sedation score in the preoperative and postoperative period and significantly lower heart rate and arterial pressures and reduced anaesthetic requirement in the intraoperative period as compared to the other groups. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine is a valuable adjunct to the technique of balanced anaesthesia for maintaining haemodynamic stability. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6775847/ /pubmed/31602071 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_86_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vijayan, Naveen K.
Talwar, Vandana
Dayal, Madhu
Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Pregabalin, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination on the Hemodynamic Response and Anesthetic Requirements in Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Prospective Study
title Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Pregabalin, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination on the Hemodynamic Response and Anesthetic Requirements in Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Prospective Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Pregabalin, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination on the Hemodynamic Response and Anesthetic Requirements in Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Prospective Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Pregabalin, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination on the Hemodynamic Response and Anesthetic Requirements in Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Pregabalin, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination on the Hemodynamic Response and Anesthetic Requirements in Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Prospective Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Pregabalin, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination on the Hemodynamic Response and Anesthetic Requirements in Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Prospective Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of the effects of pregabalin, dexmedetomidine, and their combination on the hemodynamic response and anesthetic requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind prospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31602071
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_86_19
work_keys_str_mv AT vijayannaveenk comparativeevaluationoftheeffectsofpregabalindexmedetomidineandtheircombinationonthehemodynamicresponseandanestheticrequirementsinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudy
AT talwarvandana comparativeevaluationoftheeffectsofpregabalindexmedetomidineandtheircombinationonthehemodynamicresponseandanestheticrequirementsinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudy
AT dayalmadhu comparativeevaluationoftheeffectsofpregabalindexmedetomidineandtheircombinationonthehemodynamicresponseandanestheticrequirementsinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyarandomizeddoubleblindprospectivestudy