Cargando…

Pru p 3 sensitization in children with allergy to Parietaria pollens

BACKGROUND: Pru p 3 is the major allergen of the peach and belongs to the LTP family. Pru p 3 sensitization has been associated with severe allergic symptoms after eating LTP-containing foods. However, a previous experience partially downsized the potential danger of Pru p 3 sensitization in a group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giorgio, Ciprandi, Paolo, Del Barba, Michela, Silvestri, Salvatore, Barberi, Maria, Angela Tosca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125006
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i2.7611
_version_ 1783456382007115776
author Giorgio, Ciprandi
Paolo, Del Barba
Michela, Silvestri
Salvatore, Barberi
Maria, Angela Tosca
author_facet Giorgio, Ciprandi
Paolo, Del Barba
Michela, Silvestri
Salvatore, Barberi
Maria, Angela Tosca
author_sort Giorgio, Ciprandi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pru p 3 is the major allergen of the peach and belongs to the LTP family. Pru p 3 sensitization has been associated with severe allergic symptoms after eating LTP-containing foods. However, a previous experience partially downsized the potential danger of Pru p 3 sensitization in a group of adult rhinitics. This study aimed to evaluate the real impact of Pru p 3 sensitization in children in a real-world setting. METHODS: 82 consecutive paediatric patients (55 males and 27 females, mean age 8.19±4.23 years) with allergic rhinitis due to Parietaria pollen allergy and sensitization to Pru p 3, documented by ISAC test, were evaluated. Serum IgE was measured by ImmunoCap method. Allergic symptoms occurring after ingesting LTP-containing foods were considered and scored as oral allergy syndrome, food allergy, and anaphylaxis. RESULTS: About one-quarter of Pru p 3-sensitized children reported anaphylaxis after ingesting LTP-containing foods, about half reported food allergy or oral allergy syndrome. Only ¼ was merely sensitized. CONCLUSIONS: Pru p 3 sensitization deserves careful attention in children contrary to what might occur in adult patients. It could depend on the age and the serum IgE level. Thus, Pru p 3 sensitization should be adequately interepreted and managed in clinical practice. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6776197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67761972019-11-25 Pru p 3 sensitization in children with allergy to Parietaria pollens Giorgio, Ciprandi Paolo, Del Barba Michela, Silvestri Salvatore, Barberi Maria, Angela Tosca Acta Biomed Original Article BACKGROUND: Pru p 3 is the major allergen of the peach and belongs to the LTP family. Pru p 3 sensitization has been associated with severe allergic symptoms after eating LTP-containing foods. However, a previous experience partially downsized the potential danger of Pru p 3 sensitization in a group of adult rhinitics. This study aimed to evaluate the real impact of Pru p 3 sensitization in children in a real-world setting. METHODS: 82 consecutive paediatric patients (55 males and 27 females, mean age 8.19±4.23 years) with allergic rhinitis due to Parietaria pollen allergy and sensitization to Pru p 3, documented by ISAC test, were evaluated. Serum IgE was measured by ImmunoCap method. Allergic symptoms occurring after ingesting LTP-containing foods were considered and scored as oral allergy syndrome, food allergy, and anaphylaxis. RESULTS: About one-quarter of Pru p 3-sensitized children reported anaphylaxis after ingesting LTP-containing foods, about half reported food allergy or oral allergy syndrome. Only ¼ was merely sensitized. CONCLUSIONS: Pru p 3 sensitization deserves careful attention in children contrary to what might occur in adult patients. It could depend on the age and the serum IgE level. Thus, Pru p 3 sensitization should be adequately interepreted and managed in clinical practice. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2019 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6776197/ /pubmed/31125006 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i2.7611 Text en Copyright: © 2019 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Giorgio, Ciprandi
Paolo, Del Barba
Michela, Silvestri
Salvatore, Barberi
Maria, Angela Tosca
Pru p 3 sensitization in children with allergy to Parietaria pollens
title Pru p 3 sensitization in children with allergy to Parietaria pollens
title_full Pru p 3 sensitization in children with allergy to Parietaria pollens
title_fullStr Pru p 3 sensitization in children with allergy to Parietaria pollens
title_full_unstemmed Pru p 3 sensitization in children with allergy to Parietaria pollens
title_short Pru p 3 sensitization in children with allergy to Parietaria pollens
title_sort pru p 3 sensitization in children with allergy to parietaria pollens
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125006
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i2.7611
work_keys_str_mv AT giorgiociprandi prup3sensitizationinchildrenwithallergytoparietariapollens
AT paolodelbarba prup3sensitizationinchildrenwithallergytoparietariapollens
AT michelasilvestri prup3sensitizationinchildrenwithallergytoparietariapollens
AT salvatorebarberi prup3sensitizationinchildrenwithallergytoparietariapollens
AT mariaangelatosca prup3sensitizationinchildrenwithallergytoparietariapollens