Cargando…

The requirements for manufacturing highly active or sensitising drugs comparing Good Manufacturing Practices

BACKGROUND: To date there exist no internationally recognised Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) that clearly outline universally accepted standards for manufacturing highly active or sensitising ingredients. The pharmaceutical industry is faced with a twofold problem: determining which drugs need d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fabio, Petrelli, Alessandro, Caraffa, Stefania, Scuri, Iolanda, Grappasonni, Elena, Magrini, Aldo, Cocchini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125009
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i2.8340
_version_ 1783456385382481920
author Fabio, Petrelli
Alessandro, Caraffa
Stefania, Scuri
Iolanda, Grappasonni
Elena, Magrini
Aldo, Cocchini
author_facet Fabio, Petrelli
Alessandro, Caraffa
Stefania, Scuri
Iolanda, Grappasonni
Elena, Magrini
Aldo, Cocchini
author_sort Fabio, Petrelli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date there exist no internationally recognised Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) that clearly outline universally accepted standards for manufacturing highly active or sensitising ingredients. The pharmaceutical industry is faced with a twofold problem: determining which drugs need dedicated production areas and identifying the different regulations required in different countries. The aim of this paper is to find, by comparing the current regulations of the various Regulatory Agencies, the differences between containment requirements for the production of highly active or sensitising ingredients. METHODS: An analysis of the following Regulatory Agencies’ GMPs was performed: Europe (EMA), China (CFDA), Mexico (COFEPRIS), United States (FDA), Canada (Health Canada) Brazil (ANVISA), India (CDSCO), PIC/S and WHO in order to examine the differences in terms of containment requirements set by the different Regulatory Authorities for the manufacture of highly active or sensitising ingredients. RESULTS: Our analysis found that the majority of Regulatory Agencies require that beta-lactams (sensitising materials) be produced in dedicated and segregated facilities. For “certain” highly active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), COFEPRIS, FDA, HC, EMA, PIC/S and WHO require that they be produced in facilities similar to those required for beta-lactams, while CDSCO, CFDA and ANVISA require that production takes place in segregated areas. Further differences between the Agencies have emerged regarding classes of highly APIs that require dedicated production. CONCLUSION: A study of GMP adopted by Regulatory Agencies has uncovered significant differences, in particular concerning containment requirements for the production of APIs. For this reason, the harmonisation of GMP following up-to-date quality standards based on cutting-edge science which are globally applicable is fundamental and will benefit companies and patients alike. Pharmaceutical companies would not be obliged to follow requirements enforced by the State in which they intend to manufacture a product, and patients would benefit from high-quality drugs regardless of their place of production. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6776210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67762102019-11-25 The requirements for manufacturing highly active or sensitising drugs comparing Good Manufacturing Practices Fabio, Petrelli Alessandro, Caraffa Stefania, Scuri Iolanda, Grappasonni Elena, Magrini Aldo, Cocchini Acta Biomed Original Article BACKGROUND: To date there exist no internationally recognised Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) that clearly outline universally accepted standards for manufacturing highly active or sensitising ingredients. The pharmaceutical industry is faced with a twofold problem: determining which drugs need dedicated production areas and identifying the different regulations required in different countries. The aim of this paper is to find, by comparing the current regulations of the various Regulatory Agencies, the differences between containment requirements for the production of highly active or sensitising ingredients. METHODS: An analysis of the following Regulatory Agencies’ GMPs was performed: Europe (EMA), China (CFDA), Mexico (COFEPRIS), United States (FDA), Canada (Health Canada) Brazil (ANVISA), India (CDSCO), PIC/S and WHO in order to examine the differences in terms of containment requirements set by the different Regulatory Authorities for the manufacture of highly active or sensitising ingredients. RESULTS: Our analysis found that the majority of Regulatory Agencies require that beta-lactams (sensitising materials) be produced in dedicated and segregated facilities. For “certain” highly active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), COFEPRIS, FDA, HC, EMA, PIC/S and WHO require that they be produced in facilities similar to those required for beta-lactams, while CDSCO, CFDA and ANVISA require that production takes place in segregated areas. Further differences between the Agencies have emerged regarding classes of highly APIs that require dedicated production. CONCLUSION: A study of GMP adopted by Regulatory Agencies has uncovered significant differences, in particular concerning containment requirements for the production of APIs. For this reason, the harmonisation of GMP following up-to-date quality standards based on cutting-edge science which are globally applicable is fundamental and will benefit companies and patients alike. Pharmaceutical companies would not be obliged to follow requirements enforced by the State in which they intend to manufacture a product, and patients would benefit from high-quality drugs regardless of their place of production. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2019 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6776210/ /pubmed/31125009 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i2.8340 Text en Copyright: © 2019 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Fabio, Petrelli
Alessandro, Caraffa
Stefania, Scuri
Iolanda, Grappasonni
Elena, Magrini
Aldo, Cocchini
The requirements for manufacturing highly active or sensitising drugs comparing Good Manufacturing Practices
title The requirements for manufacturing highly active or sensitising drugs comparing Good Manufacturing Practices
title_full The requirements for manufacturing highly active or sensitising drugs comparing Good Manufacturing Practices
title_fullStr The requirements for manufacturing highly active or sensitising drugs comparing Good Manufacturing Practices
title_full_unstemmed The requirements for manufacturing highly active or sensitising drugs comparing Good Manufacturing Practices
title_short The requirements for manufacturing highly active or sensitising drugs comparing Good Manufacturing Practices
title_sort requirements for manufacturing highly active or sensitising drugs comparing good manufacturing practices
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125009
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i2.8340
work_keys_str_mv AT fabiopetrelli therequirementsformanufacturinghighlyactiveorsensitisingdrugscomparinggoodmanufacturingpractices
AT alessandrocaraffa therequirementsformanufacturinghighlyactiveorsensitisingdrugscomparinggoodmanufacturingpractices
AT stefaniascuri therequirementsformanufacturinghighlyactiveorsensitisingdrugscomparinggoodmanufacturingpractices
AT iolandagrappasonni therequirementsformanufacturinghighlyactiveorsensitisingdrugscomparinggoodmanufacturingpractices
AT elenamagrini therequirementsformanufacturinghighlyactiveorsensitisingdrugscomparinggoodmanufacturingpractices
AT aldococchini therequirementsformanufacturinghighlyactiveorsensitisingdrugscomparinggoodmanufacturingpractices
AT fabiopetrelli requirementsformanufacturinghighlyactiveorsensitisingdrugscomparinggoodmanufacturingpractices
AT alessandrocaraffa requirementsformanufacturinghighlyactiveorsensitisingdrugscomparinggoodmanufacturingpractices
AT stefaniascuri requirementsformanufacturinghighlyactiveorsensitisingdrugscomparinggoodmanufacturingpractices
AT iolandagrappasonni requirementsformanufacturinghighlyactiveorsensitisingdrugscomparinggoodmanufacturingpractices
AT elenamagrini requirementsformanufacturinghighlyactiveorsensitisingdrugscomparinggoodmanufacturingpractices
AT aldococchini requirementsformanufacturinghighlyactiveorsensitisingdrugscomparinggoodmanufacturingpractices