Cargando…

Can machine learning improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy?

RATIONALE: Multiple clinical trials support the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT); however, optimal patient selection remains challenging due to substantial treatment heterogeneity among patients who meet the clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To apply machine learning t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Szu-Yeu, Santus, Enrico, Forsyth, Alexander W., Malhotra, Devvrat, Haimson, Josh, Chatterjee, Neal A., Kramer, Daniel B., Barzilay, Regina, Tulsky, James A., Lindvall, Charlotta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31581234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222397
_version_ 1783456416096321536
author Hu, Szu-Yeu
Santus, Enrico
Forsyth, Alexander W.
Malhotra, Devvrat
Haimson, Josh
Chatterjee, Neal A.
Kramer, Daniel B.
Barzilay, Regina
Tulsky, James A.
Lindvall, Charlotta
author_facet Hu, Szu-Yeu
Santus, Enrico
Forsyth, Alexander W.
Malhotra, Devvrat
Haimson, Josh
Chatterjee, Neal A.
Kramer, Daniel B.
Barzilay, Regina
Tulsky, James A.
Lindvall, Charlotta
author_sort Hu, Szu-Yeu
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Multiple clinical trials support the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT); however, optimal patient selection remains challenging due to substantial treatment heterogeneity among patients who meet the clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To apply machine learning to create an algorithm that predicts CRT outcome using electronic health record (EHR) data avaible before the procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We applied machine learning and natural language processing to the EHR of 990 patients who received CRT at two academic hospitals between 2004–2015. The primary outcome was reduced CRT benefit, defined as <0% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 6–18 months post-procedure or death by 18 months. Data regarding demographics, laboratory values, medications, clinical characteristics, and past health services utilization were extracted from the EHR available before the CRT procedure. Bigrams (i.e., two-word sequences) were also extracted from the clinical notes using natural language processing. Patients accrued on average 75 clinical notes (SD, 29) before the procedure including data not captured anywhere else in the EHR. A machine learning model was built using 80% of the patient sample (training and validation dataset), and tested on a held-out 20% patient sample (test dataset). Among 990 patients receiving CRT the mean age was 71.6 (SD, 11.8), 78.1% were male, 87.2% non-Hispanic white, and the mean baseline LVEF was 24.8% (SD, 7.69). Out of 990 patients, 403 (40.7%) were identified as having a reduced benefit from the CRT device (<0% LVEF improvement in 25.2%, death by 18 months in 15.6%). The final model identified 26% of these patients at a positive predictive value of 79% (model performance: F(β) (β = 0.1): 77%; recall 0.26; precision 0.79; accuracy 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: A machine learning model that leveraged readily available EHR data and clinical notes identified a subset of CRT patients who may not benefit from CRT before the procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6776390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67763902019-10-11 Can machine learning improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy? Hu, Szu-Yeu Santus, Enrico Forsyth, Alexander W. Malhotra, Devvrat Haimson, Josh Chatterjee, Neal A. Kramer, Daniel B. Barzilay, Regina Tulsky, James A. Lindvall, Charlotta PLoS One Research Article RATIONALE: Multiple clinical trials support the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT); however, optimal patient selection remains challenging due to substantial treatment heterogeneity among patients who meet the clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To apply machine learning to create an algorithm that predicts CRT outcome using electronic health record (EHR) data avaible before the procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We applied machine learning and natural language processing to the EHR of 990 patients who received CRT at two academic hospitals between 2004–2015. The primary outcome was reduced CRT benefit, defined as <0% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 6–18 months post-procedure or death by 18 months. Data regarding demographics, laboratory values, medications, clinical characteristics, and past health services utilization were extracted from the EHR available before the CRT procedure. Bigrams (i.e., two-word sequences) were also extracted from the clinical notes using natural language processing. Patients accrued on average 75 clinical notes (SD, 29) before the procedure including data not captured anywhere else in the EHR. A machine learning model was built using 80% of the patient sample (training and validation dataset), and tested on a held-out 20% patient sample (test dataset). Among 990 patients receiving CRT the mean age was 71.6 (SD, 11.8), 78.1% were male, 87.2% non-Hispanic white, and the mean baseline LVEF was 24.8% (SD, 7.69). Out of 990 patients, 403 (40.7%) were identified as having a reduced benefit from the CRT device (<0% LVEF improvement in 25.2%, death by 18 months in 15.6%). The final model identified 26% of these patients at a positive predictive value of 79% (model performance: F(β) (β = 0.1): 77%; recall 0.26; precision 0.79; accuracy 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: A machine learning model that leveraged readily available EHR data and clinical notes identified a subset of CRT patients who may not benefit from CRT before the procedure. Public Library of Science 2019-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6776390/ /pubmed/31581234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222397 Text en © 2019 Hu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hu, Szu-Yeu
Santus, Enrico
Forsyth, Alexander W.
Malhotra, Devvrat
Haimson, Josh
Chatterjee, Neal A.
Kramer, Daniel B.
Barzilay, Regina
Tulsky, James A.
Lindvall, Charlotta
Can machine learning improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
title Can machine learning improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
title_full Can machine learning improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
title_fullStr Can machine learning improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
title_full_unstemmed Can machine learning improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
title_short Can machine learning improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
title_sort can machine learning improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31581234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222397
work_keys_str_mv AT huszuyeu canmachinelearningimprovepatientselectionforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT santusenrico canmachinelearningimprovepatientselectionforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT forsythalexanderw canmachinelearningimprovepatientselectionforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT malhotradevvrat canmachinelearningimprovepatientselectionforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT haimsonjosh canmachinelearningimprovepatientselectionforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT chatterjeeneala canmachinelearningimprovepatientselectionforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT kramerdanielb canmachinelearningimprovepatientselectionforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT barzilayregina canmachinelearningimprovepatientselectionforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT tulskyjamesa canmachinelearningimprovepatientselectionforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT lindvallcharlotta canmachinelearningimprovepatientselectionforcardiacresynchronizationtherapy