Cargando…

Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Echocardiography, as a noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation technique, is frequently used in critically ill patients. Different opinions exist regarding whether it can be interchanged with traditional invasive means, such as the pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (TD) technique. This systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yun, Wang, Yan, Shi, Jing, Hua, Zhiqiang, Xu, Jinyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31581196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222105
_version_ 1783456416576569344
author Zhang, Yun
Wang, Yan
Shi, Jing
Hua, Zhiqiang
Xu, Jinyu
author_facet Zhang, Yun
Wang, Yan
Shi, Jing
Hua, Zhiqiang
Xu, Jinyu
author_sort Zhang, Yun
collection PubMed
description Echocardiography, as a noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation technique, is frequently used in critically ill patients. Different opinions exist regarding whether it can be interchanged with traditional invasive means, such as the pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (TD) technique. This systematic review aimed to analyze the consistency and interchangeability of cardiac output measurements by ultrasound (US) and TD. Five electronic databases were searched for studies including clinical trials conducted up to June 2019 in which patients’ cardiac output was measured by ultrasound techniques (echocardiography) and TD. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers who used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2), which was tailored according to our systematic review in Review Manager 5.3. A total of 68 studies with 1996 patients were identified as eligible. Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were used to compare the cardiac output (CO) measured using the different types of echocardiography and different sites of Doppler use with TD. No significant differences were found between US and TD (random effects model: mean difference [MD], -0.14; 95% confidence interval, -0.30 to 0.02; P = 0.08). No significant differences were observed in the subgroup analyses using different types of echocardiography and different sites except for ascending aorta (AA) (random effects model: mean difference [MD], -0.37; 95% confidence interval, -0.74 to -0.01; P = 0.05) of Doppler use. The median of bias and limits of agreement were -0.12 and ±0.94 L/min, respectively; the median of correlation coefficient was 0.827 (range, 0.140–0.998). Although the difference in CO between echocardiography by different types or sites and TD was not entirely consistent, the overall effect of meta-analysis showed that no significant differences were observed between US and TD. The techniques may be interchangeable under certain conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6776392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67763922019-10-11 Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Yun Wang, Yan Shi, Jing Hua, Zhiqiang Xu, Jinyu PLoS One Research Article Echocardiography, as a noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation technique, is frequently used in critically ill patients. Different opinions exist regarding whether it can be interchanged with traditional invasive means, such as the pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (TD) technique. This systematic review aimed to analyze the consistency and interchangeability of cardiac output measurements by ultrasound (US) and TD. Five electronic databases were searched for studies including clinical trials conducted up to June 2019 in which patients’ cardiac output was measured by ultrasound techniques (echocardiography) and TD. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers who used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2), which was tailored according to our systematic review in Review Manager 5.3. A total of 68 studies with 1996 patients were identified as eligible. Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were used to compare the cardiac output (CO) measured using the different types of echocardiography and different sites of Doppler use with TD. No significant differences were found between US and TD (random effects model: mean difference [MD], -0.14; 95% confidence interval, -0.30 to 0.02; P = 0.08). No significant differences were observed in the subgroup analyses using different types of echocardiography and different sites except for ascending aorta (AA) (random effects model: mean difference [MD], -0.37; 95% confidence interval, -0.74 to -0.01; P = 0.05) of Doppler use. The median of bias and limits of agreement were -0.12 and ±0.94 L/min, respectively; the median of correlation coefficient was 0.827 (range, 0.140–0.998). Although the difference in CO between echocardiography by different types or sites and TD was not entirely consistent, the overall effect of meta-analysis showed that no significant differences were observed between US and TD. The techniques may be interchangeable under certain conditions. Public Library of Science 2019-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6776392/ /pubmed/31581196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222105 Text en © 2019 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Yun
Wang, Yan
Shi, Jing
Hua, Zhiqiang
Xu, Jinyu
Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31581196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222105
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyun cardiacoutputmeasurementsviaechocardiographyversusthermodilutionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyan cardiacoutputmeasurementsviaechocardiographyversusthermodilutionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shijing cardiacoutputmeasurementsviaechocardiographyversusthermodilutionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huazhiqiang cardiacoutputmeasurementsviaechocardiographyversusthermodilutionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xujinyu cardiacoutputmeasurementsviaechocardiographyversusthermodilutionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis