Cargando…
Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Echocardiography, as a noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation technique, is frequently used in critically ill patients. Different opinions exist regarding whether it can be interchanged with traditional invasive means, such as the pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (TD) technique. This systematic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31581196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222105 |
_version_ | 1783456416576569344 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yun Wang, Yan Shi, Jing Hua, Zhiqiang Xu, Jinyu |
author_facet | Zhang, Yun Wang, Yan Shi, Jing Hua, Zhiqiang Xu, Jinyu |
author_sort | Zhang, Yun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Echocardiography, as a noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation technique, is frequently used in critically ill patients. Different opinions exist regarding whether it can be interchanged with traditional invasive means, such as the pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (TD) technique. This systematic review aimed to analyze the consistency and interchangeability of cardiac output measurements by ultrasound (US) and TD. Five electronic databases were searched for studies including clinical trials conducted up to June 2019 in which patients’ cardiac output was measured by ultrasound techniques (echocardiography) and TD. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers who used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2), which was tailored according to our systematic review in Review Manager 5.3. A total of 68 studies with 1996 patients were identified as eligible. Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were used to compare the cardiac output (CO) measured using the different types of echocardiography and different sites of Doppler use with TD. No significant differences were found between US and TD (random effects model: mean difference [MD], -0.14; 95% confidence interval, -0.30 to 0.02; P = 0.08). No significant differences were observed in the subgroup analyses using different types of echocardiography and different sites except for ascending aorta (AA) (random effects model: mean difference [MD], -0.37; 95% confidence interval, -0.74 to -0.01; P = 0.05) of Doppler use. The median of bias and limits of agreement were -0.12 and ±0.94 L/min, respectively; the median of correlation coefficient was 0.827 (range, 0.140–0.998). Although the difference in CO between echocardiography by different types or sites and TD was not entirely consistent, the overall effect of meta-analysis showed that no significant differences were observed between US and TD. The techniques may be interchangeable under certain conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6776392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67763922019-10-11 Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Yun Wang, Yan Shi, Jing Hua, Zhiqiang Xu, Jinyu PLoS One Research Article Echocardiography, as a noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation technique, is frequently used in critically ill patients. Different opinions exist regarding whether it can be interchanged with traditional invasive means, such as the pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (TD) technique. This systematic review aimed to analyze the consistency and interchangeability of cardiac output measurements by ultrasound (US) and TD. Five electronic databases were searched for studies including clinical trials conducted up to June 2019 in which patients’ cardiac output was measured by ultrasound techniques (echocardiography) and TD. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers who used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2), which was tailored according to our systematic review in Review Manager 5.3. A total of 68 studies with 1996 patients were identified as eligible. Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were used to compare the cardiac output (CO) measured using the different types of echocardiography and different sites of Doppler use with TD. No significant differences were found between US and TD (random effects model: mean difference [MD], -0.14; 95% confidence interval, -0.30 to 0.02; P = 0.08). No significant differences were observed in the subgroup analyses using different types of echocardiography and different sites except for ascending aorta (AA) (random effects model: mean difference [MD], -0.37; 95% confidence interval, -0.74 to -0.01; P = 0.05) of Doppler use. The median of bias and limits of agreement were -0.12 and ±0.94 L/min, respectively; the median of correlation coefficient was 0.827 (range, 0.140–0.998). Although the difference in CO between echocardiography by different types or sites and TD was not entirely consistent, the overall effect of meta-analysis showed that no significant differences were observed between US and TD. The techniques may be interchangeable under certain conditions. Public Library of Science 2019-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6776392/ /pubmed/31581196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222105 Text en © 2019 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Yun Wang, Yan Shi, Jing Hua, Zhiqiang Xu, Jinyu Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31581196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyun cardiacoutputmeasurementsviaechocardiographyversusthermodilutionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangyan cardiacoutputmeasurementsviaechocardiographyversusthermodilutionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shijing cardiacoutputmeasurementsviaechocardiographyversusthermodilutionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huazhiqiang cardiacoutputmeasurementsviaechocardiographyversusthermodilutionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xujinyu cardiacoutputmeasurementsviaechocardiographyversusthermodilutionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |