Cargando…

CT radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of radiation dose reduction on image quality in patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) combined with orthopaedic metal artefact reduction (O-MAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with metal-on-m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wellenberg, Ruud H. H., van Osch, Jochen A. C., Boelhouwers, Henk J., Edens, Mireille A., Streekstra, Geert J., Ettema, Harmen B., Boomsma, Martijn F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31016340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03206-z
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of radiation dose reduction on image quality in patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) combined with orthopaedic metal artefact reduction (O-MAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with metal-on-metal THAs received a pelvic CT with a full (FD) and a reduced radiation dose (RD) with −20%, −40%, −57%, or −80% CT radiation dose respectively, when assigned to group 1, 2, 3, or 4 respectively. FD acquisitions were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction, iDose(4). RD acquisitions were additionally reconstructed with iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR) levels 1–3 with different levels of noise suppression. CT numbers, noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were measured in muscle, fat and bladder. Subjective image quality was evaluated on seven aspects including artefacts, osseous structures, prosthetic components and soft tissues. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were randomly assigned to one of the four groups. While reducing radiation dose by 20%, 40%, 57%, or 80% in combination with IMR, CT numbers remained constant. Compared with iDose(4), the noise decreased (p < 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratios increased (p < 0.001) with IMR. O-MAR improved CT number accuracy in the bladder and reduced noise in the bladder, muscle and fat (p < 0.01). Subjective image quality was rated lower on RD IMR images than FD iDose(4) images on all seven aspects (p < 0.05) and was not related to the applied radiation dose reduction. CONCLUSION: In RD IMR with O-MAR images, CT numbers remained constant, noise decreased and contrast-to-noise ratios between muscle and fat increased compared with FD iDose(4) with O-MAR images in patients with metal-on-metal THAs. Subjective image quality reduced, regardless of the degree of radiation dose reduction.