Cargando…
CT radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of radiation dose reduction on image quality in patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) combined with orthopaedic metal artefact reduction (O-MAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with metal-on-m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31016340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03206-z |
_version_ | 1783456454907265024 |
---|---|
author | Wellenberg, Ruud H. H. van Osch, Jochen A. C. Boelhouwers, Henk J. Edens, Mireille A. Streekstra, Geert J. Ettema, Harmen B. Boomsma, Martijn F. |
author_facet | Wellenberg, Ruud H. H. van Osch, Jochen A. C. Boelhouwers, Henk J. Edens, Mireille A. Streekstra, Geert J. Ettema, Harmen B. Boomsma, Martijn F. |
author_sort | Wellenberg, Ruud H. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of radiation dose reduction on image quality in patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) combined with orthopaedic metal artefact reduction (O-MAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with metal-on-metal THAs received a pelvic CT with a full (FD) and a reduced radiation dose (RD) with −20%, −40%, −57%, or −80% CT radiation dose respectively, when assigned to group 1, 2, 3, or 4 respectively. FD acquisitions were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction, iDose(4). RD acquisitions were additionally reconstructed with iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR) levels 1–3 with different levels of noise suppression. CT numbers, noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were measured in muscle, fat and bladder. Subjective image quality was evaluated on seven aspects including artefacts, osseous structures, prosthetic components and soft tissues. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were randomly assigned to one of the four groups. While reducing radiation dose by 20%, 40%, 57%, or 80% in combination with IMR, CT numbers remained constant. Compared with iDose(4), the noise decreased (p < 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratios increased (p < 0.001) with IMR. O-MAR improved CT number accuracy in the bladder and reduced noise in the bladder, muscle and fat (p < 0.01). Subjective image quality was rated lower on RD IMR images than FD iDose(4) images on all seven aspects (p < 0.05) and was not related to the applied radiation dose reduction. CONCLUSION: In RD IMR with O-MAR images, CT numbers remained constant, noise decreased and contrast-to-noise ratios between muscle and fat increased compared with FD iDose(4) with O-MAR images in patients with metal-on-metal THAs. Subjective image quality reduced, regardless of the degree of radiation dose reduction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6776565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67765652019-10-17 CT radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction Wellenberg, Ruud H. H. van Osch, Jochen A. C. Boelhouwers, Henk J. Edens, Mireille A. Streekstra, Geert J. Ettema, Harmen B. Boomsma, Martijn F. Skeletal Radiol Scientific Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of radiation dose reduction on image quality in patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) combined with orthopaedic metal artefact reduction (O-MAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with metal-on-metal THAs received a pelvic CT with a full (FD) and a reduced radiation dose (RD) with −20%, −40%, −57%, or −80% CT radiation dose respectively, when assigned to group 1, 2, 3, or 4 respectively. FD acquisitions were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction, iDose(4). RD acquisitions were additionally reconstructed with iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR) levels 1–3 with different levels of noise suppression. CT numbers, noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were measured in muscle, fat and bladder. Subjective image quality was evaluated on seven aspects including artefacts, osseous structures, prosthetic components and soft tissues. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were randomly assigned to one of the four groups. While reducing radiation dose by 20%, 40%, 57%, or 80% in combination with IMR, CT numbers remained constant. Compared with iDose(4), the noise decreased (p < 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratios increased (p < 0.001) with IMR. O-MAR improved CT number accuracy in the bladder and reduced noise in the bladder, muscle and fat (p < 0.01). Subjective image quality was rated lower on RD IMR images than FD iDose(4) images on all seven aspects (p < 0.05) and was not related to the applied radiation dose reduction. CONCLUSION: In RD IMR with O-MAR images, CT numbers remained constant, noise decreased and contrast-to-noise ratios between muscle and fat increased compared with FD iDose(4) with O-MAR images in patients with metal-on-metal THAs. Subjective image quality reduced, regardless of the degree of radiation dose reduction. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-04-24 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6776565/ /pubmed/31016340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03206-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Wellenberg, Ruud H. H. van Osch, Jochen A. C. Boelhouwers, Henk J. Edens, Mireille A. Streekstra, Geert J. Ettema, Harmen B. Boomsma, Martijn F. CT radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction |
title | CT radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction |
title_full | CT radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction |
title_fullStr | CT radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction |
title_full_unstemmed | CT radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction |
title_short | CT radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction |
title_sort | ct radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31016340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03206-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wellenbergruudhh ctradiationdosereductioninpatientswithtotalhiparthroplastiesusingmodelbasediterativereconstructionandorthopaedicmetalartefactreduction AT vanoschjochenac ctradiationdosereductioninpatientswithtotalhiparthroplastiesusingmodelbasediterativereconstructionandorthopaedicmetalartefactreduction AT boelhouwershenkj ctradiationdosereductioninpatientswithtotalhiparthroplastiesusingmodelbasediterativereconstructionandorthopaedicmetalartefactreduction AT edensmireillea ctradiationdosereductioninpatientswithtotalhiparthroplastiesusingmodelbasediterativereconstructionandorthopaedicmetalartefactreduction AT streekstrageertj ctradiationdosereductioninpatientswithtotalhiparthroplastiesusingmodelbasediterativereconstructionandorthopaedicmetalartefactreduction AT ettemaharmenb ctradiationdosereductioninpatientswithtotalhiparthroplastiesusingmodelbasediterativereconstructionandorthopaedicmetalartefactreduction AT boomsmamartijnf ctradiationdosereductioninpatientswithtotalhiparthroplastiesusingmodelbasediterativereconstructionandorthopaedicmetalartefactreduction |