Cargando…

Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation

Background and purpose: To analyze deviations of the applied from the planned doses on a voxel-by-voxel basis for definitive prostate cancer radiotherapy depending on anatomic variations and imaging frequency. Materials and methods: Daily in-room CT imaging was performed in treatment position for 10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bostel, Tilman, Sachpazidis, Ilias, Splinter, Mona, Bougatf, Nina, Fechter, Tobias, Zamboglou, Constantinos, Jäkel, Oliver, Huber, Peter E., Baltas, Dimos, Debus, Jürgen, Nicolay, Nils H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00940
_version_ 1783456519349600256
author Bostel, Tilman
Sachpazidis, Ilias
Splinter, Mona
Bougatf, Nina
Fechter, Tobias
Zamboglou, Constantinos
Jäkel, Oliver
Huber, Peter E.
Baltas, Dimos
Debus, Jürgen
Nicolay, Nils H.
author_facet Bostel, Tilman
Sachpazidis, Ilias
Splinter, Mona
Bougatf, Nina
Fechter, Tobias
Zamboglou, Constantinos
Jäkel, Oliver
Huber, Peter E.
Baltas, Dimos
Debus, Jürgen
Nicolay, Nils H.
author_sort Bostel, Tilman
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose: To analyze deviations of the applied from the planned doses on a voxel-by-voxel basis for definitive prostate cancer radiotherapy depending on anatomic variations and imaging frequency. Materials and methods: Daily in-room CT imaging was performed in treatment position for 10 patients with prostate cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (340 fraction CTs). Applied fraction doses were recalculated on daily images, and voxel-wise dose accumulation was performed using a deformable registration algorithm. For weekly imaging, weekly position correction vectors were derived and used to rigidly register daily scans of that week to the planning CT scan prior to dose accumulation. Applied and prescribed doses were compared in dependence of the imaging frequency, and derived TCP and NTCP values were calculated. Results: Daily CT-based repositioning resulted in non-significant deviations of all analyzed dose-volume, conformity and uniformity parameters to the CTV, bladder and rectum irrespective of anatomic changes. Derived average TCP values were comparable, and NTCP values for the applied doses to the bladder and rectum did not significantly deviate from the planned values. For weekly imaging, the applied D(2) to the CTV, rectum and bladder significantly varied from the planned doses, and the CTV conformity index and D(98) decreased. While TCP values were comparable, the NTCP for the bladder erroneously appeared reduced for weekly repositioning. Conclusions: Based on daily diagnostic quality CT imaging and voxel-wise dose accumulation, we demonstrated for the first time that daily, but not weekly imaging resulted in only negligible deviations of the applied from the planned doses for prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Therefore, weekly imaging may not be adequately reliable for adaptive treatment delivery techniques for prostate. This work will contribute to devising adaptive re-planning strategies for prostate radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6776888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67768882019-10-14 Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation Bostel, Tilman Sachpazidis, Ilias Splinter, Mona Bougatf, Nina Fechter, Tobias Zamboglou, Constantinos Jäkel, Oliver Huber, Peter E. Baltas, Dimos Debus, Jürgen Nicolay, Nils H. Front Oncol Oncology Background and purpose: To analyze deviations of the applied from the planned doses on a voxel-by-voxel basis for definitive prostate cancer radiotherapy depending on anatomic variations and imaging frequency. Materials and methods: Daily in-room CT imaging was performed in treatment position for 10 patients with prostate cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (340 fraction CTs). Applied fraction doses were recalculated on daily images, and voxel-wise dose accumulation was performed using a deformable registration algorithm. For weekly imaging, weekly position correction vectors were derived and used to rigidly register daily scans of that week to the planning CT scan prior to dose accumulation. Applied and prescribed doses were compared in dependence of the imaging frequency, and derived TCP and NTCP values were calculated. Results: Daily CT-based repositioning resulted in non-significant deviations of all analyzed dose-volume, conformity and uniformity parameters to the CTV, bladder and rectum irrespective of anatomic changes. Derived average TCP values were comparable, and NTCP values for the applied doses to the bladder and rectum did not significantly deviate from the planned values. For weekly imaging, the applied D(2) to the CTV, rectum and bladder significantly varied from the planned doses, and the CTV conformity index and D(98) decreased. While TCP values were comparable, the NTCP for the bladder erroneously appeared reduced for weekly repositioning. Conclusions: Based on daily diagnostic quality CT imaging and voxel-wise dose accumulation, we demonstrated for the first time that daily, but not weekly imaging resulted in only negligible deviations of the applied from the planned doses for prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Therefore, weekly imaging may not be adequately reliable for adaptive treatment delivery techniques for prostate. This work will contribute to devising adaptive re-planning strategies for prostate radiotherapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6776888/ /pubmed/31612106 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00940 Text en Copyright © 2019 Bostel, Sachpazidis, Splinter, Bougatf, Fechter, Zamboglou, Jäkel, Huber, Baltas, Debus and Nicolay. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Bostel, Tilman
Sachpazidis, Ilias
Splinter, Mona
Bougatf, Nina
Fechter, Tobias
Zamboglou, Constantinos
Jäkel, Oliver
Huber, Peter E.
Baltas, Dimos
Debus, Jürgen
Nicolay, Nils H.
Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation
title Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation
title_full Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation
title_fullStr Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation
title_short Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation
title_sort dosimetric impact of interfractional variations in prostate cancer radiotherapy—implications for imaging frequency and treatment adaptation
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00940
work_keys_str_mv AT bosteltilman dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation
AT sachpazidisilias dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation
AT splintermona dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation
AT bougatfnina dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation
AT fechtertobias dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation
AT zamboglouconstantinos dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation
AT jakeloliver dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation
AT huberpetere dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation
AT baltasdimos dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation
AT debusjurgen dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation
AT nicolaynilsh dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation