Cargando…
Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation
Background and purpose: To analyze deviations of the applied from the planned doses on a voxel-by-voxel basis for definitive prostate cancer radiotherapy depending on anatomic variations and imaging frequency. Materials and methods: Daily in-room CT imaging was performed in treatment position for 10...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612106 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00940 |
_version_ | 1783456519349600256 |
---|---|
author | Bostel, Tilman Sachpazidis, Ilias Splinter, Mona Bougatf, Nina Fechter, Tobias Zamboglou, Constantinos Jäkel, Oliver Huber, Peter E. Baltas, Dimos Debus, Jürgen Nicolay, Nils H. |
author_facet | Bostel, Tilman Sachpazidis, Ilias Splinter, Mona Bougatf, Nina Fechter, Tobias Zamboglou, Constantinos Jäkel, Oliver Huber, Peter E. Baltas, Dimos Debus, Jürgen Nicolay, Nils H. |
author_sort | Bostel, Tilman |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and purpose: To analyze deviations of the applied from the planned doses on a voxel-by-voxel basis for definitive prostate cancer radiotherapy depending on anatomic variations and imaging frequency. Materials and methods: Daily in-room CT imaging was performed in treatment position for 10 patients with prostate cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (340 fraction CTs). Applied fraction doses were recalculated on daily images, and voxel-wise dose accumulation was performed using a deformable registration algorithm. For weekly imaging, weekly position correction vectors were derived and used to rigidly register daily scans of that week to the planning CT scan prior to dose accumulation. Applied and prescribed doses were compared in dependence of the imaging frequency, and derived TCP and NTCP values were calculated. Results: Daily CT-based repositioning resulted in non-significant deviations of all analyzed dose-volume, conformity and uniformity parameters to the CTV, bladder and rectum irrespective of anatomic changes. Derived average TCP values were comparable, and NTCP values for the applied doses to the bladder and rectum did not significantly deviate from the planned values. For weekly imaging, the applied D(2) to the CTV, rectum and bladder significantly varied from the planned doses, and the CTV conformity index and D(98) decreased. While TCP values were comparable, the NTCP for the bladder erroneously appeared reduced for weekly repositioning. Conclusions: Based on daily diagnostic quality CT imaging and voxel-wise dose accumulation, we demonstrated for the first time that daily, but not weekly imaging resulted in only negligible deviations of the applied from the planned doses for prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Therefore, weekly imaging may not be adequately reliable for adaptive treatment delivery techniques for prostate. This work will contribute to devising adaptive re-planning strategies for prostate radiotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6776888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67768882019-10-14 Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation Bostel, Tilman Sachpazidis, Ilias Splinter, Mona Bougatf, Nina Fechter, Tobias Zamboglou, Constantinos Jäkel, Oliver Huber, Peter E. Baltas, Dimos Debus, Jürgen Nicolay, Nils H. Front Oncol Oncology Background and purpose: To analyze deviations of the applied from the planned doses on a voxel-by-voxel basis for definitive prostate cancer radiotherapy depending on anatomic variations and imaging frequency. Materials and methods: Daily in-room CT imaging was performed in treatment position for 10 patients with prostate cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (340 fraction CTs). Applied fraction doses were recalculated on daily images, and voxel-wise dose accumulation was performed using a deformable registration algorithm. For weekly imaging, weekly position correction vectors were derived and used to rigidly register daily scans of that week to the planning CT scan prior to dose accumulation. Applied and prescribed doses were compared in dependence of the imaging frequency, and derived TCP and NTCP values were calculated. Results: Daily CT-based repositioning resulted in non-significant deviations of all analyzed dose-volume, conformity and uniformity parameters to the CTV, bladder and rectum irrespective of anatomic changes. Derived average TCP values were comparable, and NTCP values for the applied doses to the bladder and rectum did not significantly deviate from the planned values. For weekly imaging, the applied D(2) to the CTV, rectum and bladder significantly varied from the planned doses, and the CTV conformity index and D(98) decreased. While TCP values were comparable, the NTCP for the bladder erroneously appeared reduced for weekly repositioning. Conclusions: Based on daily diagnostic quality CT imaging and voxel-wise dose accumulation, we demonstrated for the first time that daily, but not weekly imaging resulted in only negligible deviations of the applied from the planned doses for prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Therefore, weekly imaging may not be adequately reliable for adaptive treatment delivery techniques for prostate. This work will contribute to devising adaptive re-planning strategies for prostate radiotherapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6776888/ /pubmed/31612106 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00940 Text en Copyright © 2019 Bostel, Sachpazidis, Splinter, Bougatf, Fechter, Zamboglou, Jäkel, Huber, Baltas, Debus and Nicolay. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Bostel, Tilman Sachpazidis, Ilias Splinter, Mona Bougatf, Nina Fechter, Tobias Zamboglou, Constantinos Jäkel, Oliver Huber, Peter E. Baltas, Dimos Debus, Jürgen Nicolay, Nils H. Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation |
title | Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation |
title_full | Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation |
title_fullStr | Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation |
title_short | Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations in Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy—Implications for Imaging Frequency and Treatment Adaptation |
title_sort | dosimetric impact of interfractional variations in prostate cancer radiotherapy—implications for imaging frequency and treatment adaptation |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6776888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31612106 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00940 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bosteltilman dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation AT sachpazidisilias dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation AT splintermona dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation AT bougatfnina dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation AT fechtertobias dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation AT zamboglouconstantinos dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation AT jakeloliver dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation AT huberpetere dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation AT baltasdimos dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation AT debusjurgen dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation AT nicolaynilsh dosimetricimpactofinterfractionalvariationsinprostatecancerradiotherapyimplicationsforimagingfrequencyandtreatmentadaptation |