Cargando…

Comparison of Shear Strength of Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets Cemented to Zirconia Depending on Surface Treatment: An In Vitro Study

Objectives Due to the high demand for all-ceramic restorations, monolithic zirconia restorations are nowadays frequently used. With the demand for adult orthodontic treatments, orthodontists need to be mindful of the quality of their brackets bonding to this type of material, as it requires special...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cetik, Sibel, Ha, Thaï Hoang, Sitri, Léa, Duterme, Hadrien, Pham, Viet, Atash, Ramin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31450247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1694304
_version_ 1783456577431273472
author Cetik, Sibel
Ha, Thaï Hoang
Sitri, Léa
Duterme, Hadrien
Pham, Viet
Atash, Ramin
author_facet Cetik, Sibel
Ha, Thaï Hoang
Sitri, Léa
Duterme, Hadrien
Pham, Viet
Atash, Ramin
author_sort Cetik, Sibel
collection PubMed
description Objectives Due to the high demand for all-ceramic restorations, monolithic zirconia restorations are nowadays frequently used. With the demand for adult orthodontic treatments, orthodontists need to be mindful of the quality of their brackets bonding to this type of material, as it requires special conditioning. This study aimed to compare different surface treatments of zirconia when bonding metal or ceramic orthodontic brackets. The objectives are to compare the shear bond strength; the amount of adhesive remaining on the surface of the material; the incidence of adhesive, cohesive, and mixed failures; and the occurrence of zirconia fractures. Materials and Methods Forty monolithic blocks of zirconia of a diameter of 10 mm and a length of 10 mm were prepared and randomly divided into two groups ( n = 20): metallic or ceramic brackets. Each group was subsequently divided into two subgroups ( n = 10) depending on the surface preparation (laser treatment or airborne particle abrasion): SMB (airborne particle abrasion, metal bracket), SCB (airborne particle abrasion, ceramic bracket), LMB (laser; metal bracket), and LCB (laser, ceramic bracket). The samples were tested for shear bond strength using a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant index and the occurrence of zirconia fractures and different types of failures were assessed by optical and electron microscopy. Statistical Analysis Results were analyzed using analysis of variance. Results The differences were significant between the metallic (SMB, LMB) and ceramic (SCB, LCB) bracket groups with regard to shear bond strength, with respectively 23.29 ± 5.34 MPa, 21.59 ± 4.03 MPa, 20.06 ± 4.05 MPa, and 17.55 ± 3.88 MPa. In terms of surface treatment, no statistical differences were found between the different groups. Conclusion Metal brackets have a greater bond strength than ceramic brackets when cemented to zirconia. The surface treatment of zirconia surface has no influence on the shear bond strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6777170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67771702019-10-09 Comparison of Shear Strength of Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets Cemented to Zirconia Depending on Surface Treatment: An In Vitro Study Cetik, Sibel Ha, Thaï Hoang Sitri, Léa Duterme, Hadrien Pham, Viet Atash, Ramin Eur J Dent Objectives Due to the high demand for all-ceramic restorations, monolithic zirconia restorations are nowadays frequently used. With the demand for adult orthodontic treatments, orthodontists need to be mindful of the quality of their brackets bonding to this type of material, as it requires special conditioning. This study aimed to compare different surface treatments of zirconia when bonding metal or ceramic orthodontic brackets. The objectives are to compare the shear bond strength; the amount of adhesive remaining on the surface of the material; the incidence of adhesive, cohesive, and mixed failures; and the occurrence of zirconia fractures. Materials and Methods Forty monolithic blocks of zirconia of a diameter of 10 mm and a length of 10 mm were prepared and randomly divided into two groups ( n = 20): metallic or ceramic brackets. Each group was subsequently divided into two subgroups ( n = 10) depending on the surface preparation (laser treatment or airborne particle abrasion): SMB (airborne particle abrasion, metal bracket), SCB (airborne particle abrasion, ceramic bracket), LMB (laser; metal bracket), and LCB (laser, ceramic bracket). The samples were tested for shear bond strength using a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant index and the occurrence of zirconia fractures and different types of failures were assessed by optical and electron microscopy. Statistical Analysis Results were analyzed using analysis of variance. Results The differences were significant between the metallic (SMB, LMB) and ceramic (SCB, LCB) bracket groups with regard to shear bond strength, with respectively 23.29 ± 5.34 MPa, 21.59 ± 4.03 MPa, 20.06 ± 4.05 MPa, and 17.55 ± 3.88 MPa. In terms of surface treatment, no statistical differences were found between the different groups. Conclusion Metal brackets have a greater bond strength than ceramic brackets when cemented to zirconia. The surface treatment of zirconia surface has no influence on the shear bond strength. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2019-05 2019-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6777170/ /pubmed/31450247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1694304 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cetik, Sibel
Ha, Thaï Hoang
Sitri, Léa
Duterme, Hadrien
Pham, Viet
Atash, Ramin
Comparison of Shear Strength of Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets Cemented to Zirconia Depending on Surface Treatment: An In Vitro Study
title Comparison of Shear Strength of Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets Cemented to Zirconia Depending on Surface Treatment: An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparison of Shear Strength of Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets Cemented to Zirconia Depending on Surface Treatment: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Shear Strength of Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets Cemented to Zirconia Depending on Surface Treatment: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Shear Strength of Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets Cemented to Zirconia Depending on Surface Treatment: An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparison of Shear Strength of Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets Cemented to Zirconia Depending on Surface Treatment: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparison of shear strength of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets cemented to zirconia depending on surface treatment: an in vitro study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31450247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1694304
work_keys_str_mv AT cetiksibel comparisonofshearstrengthofmetalandceramicorthodonticbracketscementedtozirconiadependingonsurfacetreatmentaninvitrostudy
AT hathaihoang comparisonofshearstrengthofmetalandceramicorthodonticbracketscementedtozirconiadependingonsurfacetreatmentaninvitrostudy
AT sitrilea comparisonofshearstrengthofmetalandceramicorthodonticbracketscementedtozirconiadependingonsurfacetreatmentaninvitrostudy
AT dutermehadrien comparisonofshearstrengthofmetalandceramicorthodonticbracketscementedtozirconiadependingonsurfacetreatmentaninvitrostudy
AT phamviet comparisonofshearstrengthofmetalandceramicorthodonticbracketscementedtozirconiadependingonsurfacetreatmentaninvitrostudy
AT atashramin comparisonofshearstrengthofmetalandceramicorthodonticbracketscementedtozirconiadependingonsurfacetreatmentaninvitrostudy