Cargando…
Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem?
Recent US Supreme Court decisions have invalidated patent claims on isolated genomic DNA, and testing methods that applied medical correlations using conventional techniques. As a consequence, US genetic testing laboratories have a relatively low risk of infringing patents on naturally occurring DNA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30846855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0368-7 |
_version_ | 1783456645175574528 |
---|---|
author | Liddicoat, Johnathon Liddell, Kathleen McCarthy, Arlie H. Hogarth, Stuart Aboy, Mateo Nicol, Dianne Patton, Simon Hopkins, Michael M. |
author_facet | Liddicoat, Johnathon Liddell, Kathleen McCarthy, Arlie H. Hogarth, Stuart Aboy, Mateo Nicol, Dianne Patton, Simon Hopkins, Michael M. |
author_sort | Liddicoat, Johnathon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent US Supreme Court decisions have invalidated patent claims on isolated genomic DNA, and testing methods that applied medical correlations using conventional techniques. As a consequence, US genetic testing laboratories have a relatively low risk of infringing patents on naturally occurring DNA or methods for detecting genomic variants. In Europe, however, such claims remain patentable, and European laboratories risk infringing them. We report the results from a survey that collected data on the impact of patents on European genetic testing laboratories. The results indicate that the proportion of European laboratories that have refrained from providing associated testing services owing to patent protection has increased over the last decade (up from 7% in 2008 to 15% in 2017), and that the non-profit sector was particularly strongly affected (up from 4% in 2008 to 14% in 2017). We renew calls for more readily available legal support to help public sector laboratories deal with patent issues, but we do not recommend aligning European law with US law at present. Watchful monitoring is also recommended to ensure that patents do not become a greater hindrance for clinical genetic testing laboratories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6777525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67775252019-10-07 Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem? Liddicoat, Johnathon Liddell, Kathleen McCarthy, Arlie H. Hogarth, Stuart Aboy, Mateo Nicol, Dianne Patton, Simon Hopkins, Michael M. Eur J Hum Genet Article Recent US Supreme Court decisions have invalidated patent claims on isolated genomic DNA, and testing methods that applied medical correlations using conventional techniques. As a consequence, US genetic testing laboratories have a relatively low risk of infringing patents on naturally occurring DNA or methods for detecting genomic variants. In Europe, however, such claims remain patentable, and European laboratories risk infringing them. We report the results from a survey that collected data on the impact of patents on European genetic testing laboratories. The results indicate that the proportion of European laboratories that have refrained from providing associated testing services owing to patent protection has increased over the last decade (up from 7% in 2008 to 15% in 2017), and that the non-profit sector was particularly strongly affected (up from 4% in 2008 to 14% in 2017). We renew calls for more readily available legal support to help public sector laboratories deal with patent issues, but we do not recommend aligning European law with US law at present. Watchful monitoring is also recommended to ensure that patents do not become a greater hindrance for clinical genetic testing laboratories. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-07 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6777525/ /pubmed/30846855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0368-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Liddicoat, Johnathon Liddell, Kathleen McCarthy, Arlie H. Hogarth, Stuart Aboy, Mateo Nicol, Dianne Patton, Simon Hopkins, Michael M. Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem? |
title | Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem? |
title_full | Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem? |
title_fullStr | Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem? |
title_full_unstemmed | Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem? |
title_short | Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem? |
title_sort | continental drift? do european clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30846855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0368-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liddicoatjohnathon continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem AT liddellkathleen continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem AT mccarthyarlieh continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem AT hogarthstuart continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem AT aboymateo continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem AT nicoldianne continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem AT pattonsimon continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem AT hopkinsmichaelm continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem |