Cargando…

Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem?

Recent US Supreme Court decisions have invalidated patent claims on isolated genomic DNA, and testing methods that applied medical correlations using conventional techniques. As a consequence, US genetic testing laboratories have a relatively low risk of infringing patents on naturally occurring DNA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liddicoat, Johnathon, Liddell, Kathleen, McCarthy, Arlie H., Hogarth, Stuart, Aboy, Mateo, Nicol, Dianne, Patton, Simon, Hopkins, Michael M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30846855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0368-7
_version_ 1783456645175574528
author Liddicoat, Johnathon
Liddell, Kathleen
McCarthy, Arlie H.
Hogarth, Stuart
Aboy, Mateo
Nicol, Dianne
Patton, Simon
Hopkins, Michael M.
author_facet Liddicoat, Johnathon
Liddell, Kathleen
McCarthy, Arlie H.
Hogarth, Stuart
Aboy, Mateo
Nicol, Dianne
Patton, Simon
Hopkins, Michael M.
author_sort Liddicoat, Johnathon
collection PubMed
description Recent US Supreme Court decisions have invalidated patent claims on isolated genomic DNA, and testing methods that applied medical correlations using conventional techniques. As a consequence, US genetic testing laboratories have a relatively low risk of infringing patents on naturally occurring DNA or methods for detecting genomic variants. In Europe, however, such claims remain patentable, and European laboratories risk infringing them. We report the results from a survey that collected data on the impact of patents on European genetic testing laboratories. The results indicate that the proportion of European laboratories that have refrained from providing associated testing services owing to patent protection has increased over the last decade (up from 7% in 2008 to 15% in 2017), and that the non-profit sector was particularly strongly affected (up from 4% in 2008 to 14% in 2017). We renew calls for more readily available legal support to help public sector laboratories deal with patent issues, but we do not recommend aligning European law with US law at present. Watchful monitoring is also recommended to ensure that patents do not become a greater hindrance for clinical genetic testing laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6777525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67775252019-10-07 Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem? Liddicoat, Johnathon Liddell, Kathleen McCarthy, Arlie H. Hogarth, Stuart Aboy, Mateo Nicol, Dianne Patton, Simon Hopkins, Michael M. Eur J Hum Genet Article Recent US Supreme Court decisions have invalidated patent claims on isolated genomic DNA, and testing methods that applied medical correlations using conventional techniques. As a consequence, US genetic testing laboratories have a relatively low risk of infringing patents on naturally occurring DNA or methods for detecting genomic variants. In Europe, however, such claims remain patentable, and European laboratories risk infringing them. We report the results from a survey that collected data on the impact of patents on European genetic testing laboratories. The results indicate that the proportion of European laboratories that have refrained from providing associated testing services owing to patent protection has increased over the last decade (up from 7% in 2008 to 15% in 2017), and that the non-profit sector was particularly strongly affected (up from 4% in 2008 to 14% in 2017). We renew calls for more readily available legal support to help public sector laboratories deal with patent issues, but we do not recommend aligning European law with US law at present. Watchful monitoring is also recommended to ensure that patents do not become a greater hindrance for clinical genetic testing laboratories. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-07 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6777525/ /pubmed/30846855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0368-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Liddicoat, Johnathon
Liddell, Kathleen
McCarthy, Arlie H.
Hogarth, Stuart
Aboy, Mateo
Nicol, Dianne
Patton, Simon
Hopkins, Michael M.
Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem?
title Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem?
title_full Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem?
title_fullStr Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem?
title_full_unstemmed Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem?
title_short Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem?
title_sort continental drift? do european clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30846855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0368-7
work_keys_str_mv AT liddicoatjohnathon continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem
AT liddellkathleen continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem
AT mccarthyarlieh continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem
AT hogarthstuart continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem
AT aboymateo continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem
AT nicoldianne continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem
AT pattonsimon continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem
AT hopkinsmichaelm continentaldriftdoeuropeanclinicalgenetictestinglaboratorieshaveapatentproblem