Cargando…
Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are a major burden for patients undergoing emetogenic chemotherapy. International guidelines recommend an antiemetic prophylaxis with corticosteroids, 5-HT(3)R-antagonists and NK(1)R-antagonists. The NK(1)R-antagonist fosaprepitant has show...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31686784 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S214264 |
_version_ | 1783456649266069504 |
---|---|
author | Cabanillas Stanchi, Karin Melanie Ebinger, Martin Hartmann, Ulrike Queudeville, Manon Feucht, Judith Ost, Michael Koch, Marie-Sarah Malaval, Carmen Mezger, Markus Schober, Sarah Weber, Simone Michaelis, Sebastian Lange, Veit Lang, Peter Handgretinger, Rupert Döring, Michaela |
author_facet | Cabanillas Stanchi, Karin Melanie Ebinger, Martin Hartmann, Ulrike Queudeville, Manon Feucht, Judith Ost, Michael Koch, Marie-Sarah Malaval, Carmen Mezger, Markus Schober, Sarah Weber, Simone Michaelis, Sebastian Lange, Veit Lang, Peter Handgretinger, Rupert Döring, Michaela |
author_sort | Cabanillas Stanchi, Karin Melanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are a major burden for patients undergoing emetogenic chemotherapy. International guidelines recommend an antiemetic prophylaxis with corticosteroids, 5-HT(3)R-antagonists and NK(1)R-antagonists. The NK(1)R-antagonist fosaprepitant has shown favorable results in pediatric and adult patients. There is little pediatric experience with fosaprepitant. METHODS: This non-interventional observation study analyzed 303 chemotherapy courses administered to 83 pediatric patients with a median age of 9 years (2–17 years), who received antiemetic prophylaxis either with fosaprepitant and granisetron with or without dexamethasone (fosaprepitant group/FG; n=41), or granisetron with or without dexamethasone (control group/CG; n=42), during moderately (CINV risk 30–90%) or highly (CINV risk>90%) emetogenic chemotherapy. The two groups’ results were compared with respect to the safety and efficacy of the antiemetic prophylaxis during the acute (0-24hrs after chemotherapy), delayed (>24–120hrs after chemotherapy) and both CINV phases. Laboratory and clinical adverse events were compared between the two cohorts. RESULTS: Adverse events were not significantly different in the two groups (p>0.05). Significantly fewer vomiting events occurred during antiemetic prophylaxis with fosaprepitant in the acute (23 vs 142 events; p<0.0001) and the delayed (71 vs 255 events; p<0.0001) CINV phase. In the control group, the percentage of chemotherapy courses with vomiting was significantly higher during the acute (24%/FG vs 45%/CG; p<0.0001) and delayed CINV phase (28%/FG vs 47%/CG; p=0.0004). Dimenhydrinate (rescue medication) was administered significantly more often in the CG, compared to the FG (114/FG vs 320/CG doses; p<0.0001). Likewise, in the control group, dimenhydrinate was administered in significantly more (p<0.0001) chemotherapy courses during the acute and delayed CINV phases (79 of 150; 52.7%), compared to the fosaprepitant group (45 of 153; 29.4%). CONCLUSION: Antiemetic prophylaxis with fosaprepitant and granisetron with or without dexamethasone was well tolerated, safe and effective in pediatric patients. However, larger prospective trials are needed to evaluate these findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6777642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67776422019-11-04 Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies Cabanillas Stanchi, Karin Melanie Ebinger, Martin Hartmann, Ulrike Queudeville, Manon Feucht, Judith Ost, Michael Koch, Marie-Sarah Malaval, Carmen Mezger, Markus Schober, Sarah Weber, Simone Michaelis, Sebastian Lange, Veit Lang, Peter Handgretinger, Rupert Döring, Michaela Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are a major burden for patients undergoing emetogenic chemotherapy. International guidelines recommend an antiemetic prophylaxis with corticosteroids, 5-HT(3)R-antagonists and NK(1)R-antagonists. The NK(1)R-antagonist fosaprepitant has shown favorable results in pediatric and adult patients. There is little pediatric experience with fosaprepitant. METHODS: This non-interventional observation study analyzed 303 chemotherapy courses administered to 83 pediatric patients with a median age of 9 years (2–17 years), who received antiemetic prophylaxis either with fosaprepitant and granisetron with or without dexamethasone (fosaprepitant group/FG; n=41), or granisetron with or without dexamethasone (control group/CG; n=42), during moderately (CINV risk 30–90%) or highly (CINV risk>90%) emetogenic chemotherapy. The two groups’ results were compared with respect to the safety and efficacy of the antiemetic prophylaxis during the acute (0-24hrs after chemotherapy), delayed (>24–120hrs after chemotherapy) and both CINV phases. Laboratory and clinical adverse events were compared between the two cohorts. RESULTS: Adverse events were not significantly different in the two groups (p>0.05). Significantly fewer vomiting events occurred during antiemetic prophylaxis with fosaprepitant in the acute (23 vs 142 events; p<0.0001) and the delayed (71 vs 255 events; p<0.0001) CINV phase. In the control group, the percentage of chemotherapy courses with vomiting was significantly higher during the acute (24%/FG vs 45%/CG; p<0.0001) and delayed CINV phase (28%/FG vs 47%/CG; p=0.0004). Dimenhydrinate (rescue medication) was administered significantly more often in the CG, compared to the FG (114/FG vs 320/CG doses; p<0.0001). Likewise, in the control group, dimenhydrinate was administered in significantly more (p<0.0001) chemotherapy courses during the acute and delayed CINV phases (79 of 150; 52.7%), compared to the fosaprepitant group (45 of 153; 29.4%). CONCLUSION: Antiemetic prophylaxis with fosaprepitant and granisetron with or without dexamethasone was well tolerated, safe and effective in pediatric patients. However, larger prospective trials are needed to evaluate these findings. Dove 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6777642/ /pubmed/31686784 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S214264 Text en © 2019 Cabanillas Stanchi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Cabanillas Stanchi, Karin Melanie Ebinger, Martin Hartmann, Ulrike Queudeville, Manon Feucht, Judith Ost, Michael Koch, Marie-Sarah Malaval, Carmen Mezger, Markus Schober, Sarah Weber, Simone Michaelis, Sebastian Lange, Veit Lang, Peter Handgretinger, Rupert Döring, Michaela Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies |
title | Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies |
title_full | Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies |
title_fullStr | Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies |
title_short | Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies |
title_sort | efficacy, safety and feasibility of antiemetic prophylaxis with fosaprepitant, granisetron and dexamethasone in pediatric patients with hemato-oncological malignancies |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31686784 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S214264 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cabanillasstanchikarinmelanie efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT ebingermartin efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT hartmannulrike efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT queudevillemanon efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT feuchtjudith efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT ostmichael efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT kochmariesarah efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT malavalcarmen efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT mezgermarkus efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT schobersarah efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT webersimone efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT michaelissebastian efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT langeveit efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT langpeter efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT handgretingerrupert efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies AT doringmichaela efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies |