Cargando…

Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are a major burden for patients undergoing emetogenic chemotherapy. International guidelines recommend an antiemetic prophylaxis with corticosteroids, 5-HT(3)R-antagonists and NK(1)R-antagonists. The NK(1)R-antagonist fosaprepitant has show...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cabanillas Stanchi, Karin Melanie, Ebinger, Martin, Hartmann, Ulrike, Queudeville, Manon, Feucht, Judith, Ost, Michael, Koch, Marie-Sarah, Malaval, Carmen, Mezger, Markus, Schober, Sarah, Weber, Simone, Michaelis, Sebastian, Lange, Veit, Lang, Peter, Handgretinger, Rupert, Döring, Michaela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31686784
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S214264
_version_ 1783456649266069504
author Cabanillas Stanchi, Karin Melanie
Ebinger, Martin
Hartmann, Ulrike
Queudeville, Manon
Feucht, Judith
Ost, Michael
Koch, Marie-Sarah
Malaval, Carmen
Mezger, Markus
Schober, Sarah
Weber, Simone
Michaelis, Sebastian
Lange, Veit
Lang, Peter
Handgretinger, Rupert
Döring, Michaela
author_facet Cabanillas Stanchi, Karin Melanie
Ebinger, Martin
Hartmann, Ulrike
Queudeville, Manon
Feucht, Judith
Ost, Michael
Koch, Marie-Sarah
Malaval, Carmen
Mezger, Markus
Schober, Sarah
Weber, Simone
Michaelis, Sebastian
Lange, Veit
Lang, Peter
Handgretinger, Rupert
Döring, Michaela
author_sort Cabanillas Stanchi, Karin Melanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are a major burden for patients undergoing emetogenic chemotherapy. International guidelines recommend an antiemetic prophylaxis with corticosteroids, 5-HT(3)R-antagonists and NK(1)R-antagonists. The NK(1)R-antagonist fosaprepitant has shown favorable results in pediatric and adult patients. There is little pediatric experience with fosaprepitant. METHODS: This non-interventional observation study analyzed 303 chemotherapy courses administered to 83 pediatric patients with a median age of 9 years (2–17 years), who received antiemetic prophylaxis either with fosaprepitant and granisetron with or without dexamethasone (fosaprepitant group/FG; n=41), or granisetron with or without dexamethasone (control group/CG; n=42), during moderately (CINV risk 30–90%) or highly (CINV risk>90%) emetogenic chemotherapy. The two groups’ results were compared with respect to the safety and efficacy of the antiemetic prophylaxis during the acute (0-24hrs after chemotherapy), delayed (>24–120hrs after chemotherapy) and both CINV phases. Laboratory and clinical adverse events were compared between the two cohorts. RESULTS: Adverse events were not significantly different in the two groups (p>0.05). Significantly fewer vomiting events occurred during antiemetic prophylaxis with fosaprepitant in the acute (23 vs 142 events; p<0.0001) and the delayed (71 vs 255 events; p<0.0001) CINV phase. In the control group, the percentage of chemotherapy courses with vomiting was significantly higher during the acute (24%/FG vs 45%/CG; p<0.0001) and delayed CINV phase (28%/FG vs 47%/CG; p=0.0004). Dimenhydrinate (rescue medication) was administered significantly more often in the CG, compared to the FG (114/FG vs 320/CG doses; p<0.0001). Likewise, in the control group, dimenhydrinate was administered in significantly more (p<0.0001) chemotherapy courses during the acute and delayed CINV phases (79 of 150; 52.7%), compared to the fosaprepitant group (45 of 153; 29.4%). CONCLUSION: Antiemetic prophylaxis with fosaprepitant and granisetron with or without dexamethasone was well tolerated, safe and effective in pediatric patients. However, larger prospective trials are needed to evaluate these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6777642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67776422019-11-04 Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies Cabanillas Stanchi, Karin Melanie Ebinger, Martin Hartmann, Ulrike Queudeville, Manon Feucht, Judith Ost, Michael Koch, Marie-Sarah Malaval, Carmen Mezger, Markus Schober, Sarah Weber, Simone Michaelis, Sebastian Lange, Veit Lang, Peter Handgretinger, Rupert Döring, Michaela Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are a major burden for patients undergoing emetogenic chemotherapy. International guidelines recommend an antiemetic prophylaxis with corticosteroids, 5-HT(3)R-antagonists and NK(1)R-antagonists. The NK(1)R-antagonist fosaprepitant has shown favorable results in pediatric and adult patients. There is little pediatric experience with fosaprepitant. METHODS: This non-interventional observation study analyzed 303 chemotherapy courses administered to 83 pediatric patients with a median age of 9 years (2–17 years), who received antiemetic prophylaxis either with fosaprepitant and granisetron with or without dexamethasone (fosaprepitant group/FG; n=41), or granisetron with or without dexamethasone (control group/CG; n=42), during moderately (CINV risk 30–90%) or highly (CINV risk>90%) emetogenic chemotherapy. The two groups’ results were compared with respect to the safety and efficacy of the antiemetic prophylaxis during the acute (0-24hrs after chemotherapy), delayed (>24–120hrs after chemotherapy) and both CINV phases. Laboratory and clinical adverse events were compared between the two cohorts. RESULTS: Adverse events were not significantly different in the two groups (p>0.05). Significantly fewer vomiting events occurred during antiemetic prophylaxis with fosaprepitant in the acute (23 vs 142 events; p<0.0001) and the delayed (71 vs 255 events; p<0.0001) CINV phase. In the control group, the percentage of chemotherapy courses with vomiting was significantly higher during the acute (24%/FG vs 45%/CG; p<0.0001) and delayed CINV phase (28%/FG vs 47%/CG; p=0.0004). Dimenhydrinate (rescue medication) was administered significantly more often in the CG, compared to the FG (114/FG vs 320/CG doses; p<0.0001). Likewise, in the control group, dimenhydrinate was administered in significantly more (p<0.0001) chemotherapy courses during the acute and delayed CINV phases (79 of 150; 52.7%), compared to the fosaprepitant group (45 of 153; 29.4%). CONCLUSION: Antiemetic prophylaxis with fosaprepitant and granisetron with or without dexamethasone was well tolerated, safe and effective in pediatric patients. However, larger prospective trials are needed to evaluate these findings. Dove 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6777642/ /pubmed/31686784 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S214264 Text en © 2019 Cabanillas Stanchi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Cabanillas Stanchi, Karin Melanie
Ebinger, Martin
Hartmann, Ulrike
Queudeville, Manon
Feucht, Judith
Ost, Michael
Koch, Marie-Sarah
Malaval, Carmen
Mezger, Markus
Schober, Sarah
Weber, Simone
Michaelis, Sebastian
Lange, Veit
Lang, Peter
Handgretinger, Rupert
Döring, Michaela
Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies
title Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies
title_full Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies
title_fullStr Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies
title_short Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies
title_sort efficacy, safety and feasibility of antiemetic prophylaxis with fosaprepitant, granisetron and dexamethasone in pediatric patients with hemato-oncological malignancies
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6777642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31686784
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S214264
work_keys_str_mv AT cabanillasstanchikarinmelanie efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT ebingermartin efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT hartmannulrike efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT queudevillemanon efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT feuchtjudith efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT ostmichael efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT kochmariesarah efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT malavalcarmen efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT mezgermarkus efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT schobersarah efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT webersimone efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT michaelissebastian efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT langeveit efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT langpeter efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT handgretingerrupert efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies
AT doringmichaela efficacysafetyandfeasibilityofantiemeticprophylaxiswithfosaprepitantgranisetronanddexamethasoneinpediatricpatientswithhematooncologicalmalignancies