Cargando…

Same but different? A thematic analysis on adalimumab biosimilar switching among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND: Biologic medications have dramatically enhanced the treatment of many chronic paediatric inflammatory conditions. Their high cost is a factor that prohibits their broader use. Cheaper generic versions, or biosimilars, are increasingly being used. Healthcare services are switching some pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renton, William D., Leveret, Helen, Guly, Catherine, Smee, Heather, Leveret, Jamie, Ramanan, Athimalaipet V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31585539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12969-019-0366-x
_version_ 1783456754448728064
author Renton, William D.
Leveret, Helen
Guly, Catherine
Smee, Heather
Leveret, Jamie
Ramanan, Athimalaipet V.
author_facet Renton, William D.
Leveret, Helen
Guly, Catherine
Smee, Heather
Leveret, Jamie
Ramanan, Athimalaipet V.
author_sort Renton, William D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biologic medications have dramatically enhanced the treatment of many chronic paediatric inflammatory conditions. Their high cost is a factor that prohibits their broader use. Cheaper generic versions, or biosimilars, are increasingly being used. Healthcare services are switching some patients over to biosimilars for economic reasons, known as ‘non-medical switching’. Some patients unsuccessfully switch due to perceived decreases in efficacy or non-specific drug effects. The implications of failed switching include exhaustion of therapeutic options, unnecessary exposure to other medications, increased healthcare utilisation, worse patient outcomes and higher overall healthcare costs. Patient perceptions almost certainly play a role in these ‘failed switches’. METHODS: A thematic analysis was performed to better understand patient and parent perceptions on non-medical biosimilar switching. The study was conducted in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research recommendations. Patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis currently taking adalimumab were included. RESULTS: Nine families were interviewed just prior to a hospital trust-wide non-medical switch to an adalimumab biosimilar. Several common themes were identified. The most frequent concerns were regarding practical aspects of the switch including the medication administration device type; the colour of the medication and administration device; and whether the injections would sting more. The relative safety and efficacy of the biosimilar was raised although most families felt that there would be no significant difference. Anxieties about the switch were largely placated by reassurances from the medical team. CONCLUSIONS: We derived recommendations based on existing adult literature and the observations from our study to optimise the benefits from non-medical biosimilar switching. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12969-019-0366-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6778384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67783842019-10-07 Same but different? A thematic analysis on adalimumab biosimilar switching among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis Renton, William D. Leveret, Helen Guly, Catherine Smee, Heather Leveret, Jamie Ramanan, Athimalaipet V. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J Research Article BACKGROUND: Biologic medications have dramatically enhanced the treatment of many chronic paediatric inflammatory conditions. Their high cost is a factor that prohibits their broader use. Cheaper generic versions, or biosimilars, are increasingly being used. Healthcare services are switching some patients over to biosimilars for economic reasons, known as ‘non-medical switching’. Some patients unsuccessfully switch due to perceived decreases in efficacy or non-specific drug effects. The implications of failed switching include exhaustion of therapeutic options, unnecessary exposure to other medications, increased healthcare utilisation, worse patient outcomes and higher overall healthcare costs. Patient perceptions almost certainly play a role in these ‘failed switches’. METHODS: A thematic analysis was performed to better understand patient and parent perceptions on non-medical biosimilar switching. The study was conducted in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research recommendations. Patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis currently taking adalimumab were included. RESULTS: Nine families were interviewed just prior to a hospital trust-wide non-medical switch to an adalimumab biosimilar. Several common themes were identified. The most frequent concerns were regarding practical aspects of the switch including the medication administration device type; the colour of the medication and administration device; and whether the injections would sting more. The relative safety and efficacy of the biosimilar was raised although most families felt that there would be no significant difference. Anxieties about the switch were largely placated by reassurances from the medical team. CONCLUSIONS: We derived recommendations based on existing adult literature and the observations from our study to optimise the benefits from non-medical biosimilar switching. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12969-019-0366-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6778384/ /pubmed/31585539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12969-019-0366-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Renton, William D.
Leveret, Helen
Guly, Catherine
Smee, Heather
Leveret, Jamie
Ramanan, Athimalaipet V.
Same but different? A thematic analysis on adalimumab biosimilar switching among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
title Same but different? A thematic analysis on adalimumab biosimilar switching among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
title_full Same but different? A thematic analysis on adalimumab biosimilar switching among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
title_fullStr Same but different? A thematic analysis on adalimumab biosimilar switching among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Same but different? A thematic analysis on adalimumab biosimilar switching among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
title_short Same but different? A thematic analysis on adalimumab biosimilar switching among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
title_sort same but different? a thematic analysis on adalimumab biosimilar switching among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31585539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12969-019-0366-x
work_keys_str_mv AT rentonwilliamd samebutdifferentathematicanalysisonadalimumabbiosimilarswitchingamongpatientswithjuvenileidiopathicarthritis
AT leverethelen samebutdifferentathematicanalysisonadalimumabbiosimilarswitchingamongpatientswithjuvenileidiopathicarthritis
AT gulycatherine samebutdifferentathematicanalysisonadalimumabbiosimilarswitchingamongpatientswithjuvenileidiopathicarthritis
AT smeeheather samebutdifferentathematicanalysisonadalimumabbiosimilarswitchingamongpatientswithjuvenileidiopathicarthritis
AT leveretjamie samebutdifferentathematicanalysisonadalimumabbiosimilarswitchingamongpatientswithjuvenileidiopathicarthritis
AT ramananathimalaipetv samebutdifferentathematicanalysisonadalimumabbiosimilarswitchingamongpatientswithjuvenileidiopathicarthritis