Cargando…
Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to translate the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score into Slovenian and to test its validity on Slovenian patients who underwent low anterior rectal resection. METHODS: The LARS score was translated from English into Slovenian and then back-translated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sciendo
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636722 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2019-0019 |
_version_ | 1783456760678318080 |
---|---|
author | Grosek, Jan Košir, Jurij Aleš Novak, Jerica Omejc, Mirko Tomažič, Aleš Norčič, Gregor |
author_facet | Grosek, Jan Košir, Jurij Aleš Novak, Jerica Omejc, Mirko Tomažič, Aleš Norčič, Gregor |
author_sort | Grosek, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to translate the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score into Slovenian and to test its validity on Slovenian patients who underwent low anterior rectal resection. METHODS: The LARS score was translated from English into Slovenian and then back-translated following international recommendations. The Slovenian version of the LARS questionnaire was completed by patients who underwent low anterior rectal resection between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2010 at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana. An anchor question assessing the impact of bowel function on lifestyle was included. To assess test-retest reliability, some of the patients answered the LARS score questionnaire twice. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (66.7%) of the 150 patients who were contacted for participation, were included in the final analysis. A total of 58 patients reported major LARS score. The LARS score was able to discriminate between patients who received radiotherapy and those who did not (p<0.001), and between total and partial mesorectal excision (p<0.001). Age was not associated with a greater LARS score (p=0.975). There was a perfect fit between the QoL category question and the LARS score in 66.0% of cases and a moderate fit was found in 24.0% of the cases, showing good convergent validity. Test-retest reliability of 51 patients showed a high intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: The Slovenian translation of the LARS score is a valid tool for measuring LARS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6778418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Sciendo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67784182019-10-21 Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery Grosek, Jan Košir, Jurij Aleš Novak, Jerica Omejc, Mirko Tomažič, Aleš Norčič, Gregor Zdr Varst Original Scientific Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to translate the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score into Slovenian and to test its validity on Slovenian patients who underwent low anterior rectal resection. METHODS: The LARS score was translated from English into Slovenian and then back-translated following international recommendations. The Slovenian version of the LARS questionnaire was completed by patients who underwent low anterior rectal resection between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2010 at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana. An anchor question assessing the impact of bowel function on lifestyle was included. To assess test-retest reliability, some of the patients answered the LARS score questionnaire twice. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (66.7%) of the 150 patients who were contacted for participation, were included in the final analysis. A total of 58 patients reported major LARS score. The LARS score was able to discriminate between patients who received radiotherapy and those who did not (p<0.001), and between total and partial mesorectal excision (p<0.001). Age was not associated with a greater LARS score (p=0.975). There was a perfect fit between the QoL category question and the LARS score in 66.0% of cases and a moderate fit was found in 24.0% of the cases, showing good convergent validity. Test-retest reliability of 51 patients showed a high intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: The Slovenian translation of the LARS score is a valid tool for measuring LARS. Sciendo 2019-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6778418/ /pubmed/31636722 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2019-0019 Text en © 2019 Jan Grosek, Jurij Aleš Košir, Jerica Novak, Mirko Omejc, Aleš Tomažič, Gregor Norčič, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Original Scientific Article Grosek, Jan Košir, Jurij Aleš Novak, Jerica Omejc, Mirko Tomažič, Aleš Norčič, Gregor Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery |
title | Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery |
title_full | Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery |
title_fullStr | Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery |
title_short | Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery |
title_sort | validation of the slovenian version of the low anterior resection syndrome score for rectal cancer patients after surgery |
topic | Original Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636722 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2019-0019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grosekjan validationoftheslovenianversionofthelowanteriorresectionsyndromescoreforrectalcancerpatientsaftersurgery AT kosirjurijales validationoftheslovenianversionofthelowanteriorresectionsyndromescoreforrectalcancerpatientsaftersurgery AT novakjerica validationoftheslovenianversionofthelowanteriorresectionsyndromescoreforrectalcancerpatientsaftersurgery AT omejcmirko validationoftheslovenianversionofthelowanteriorresectionsyndromescoreforrectalcancerpatientsaftersurgery AT tomazicales validationoftheslovenianversionofthelowanteriorresectionsyndromescoreforrectalcancerpatientsaftersurgery AT norcicgregor validationoftheslovenianversionofthelowanteriorresectionsyndromescoreforrectalcancerpatientsaftersurgery |