Cargando…

Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to translate the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score into Slovenian and to test its validity on Slovenian patients who underwent low anterior rectal resection. METHODS: The LARS score was translated from English into Slovenian and then back-translated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grosek, Jan, Košir, Jurij Aleš, Novak, Jerica, Omejc, Mirko, Tomažič, Aleš, Norčič, Gregor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636722
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2019-0019
_version_ 1783456760678318080
author Grosek, Jan
Košir, Jurij Aleš
Novak, Jerica
Omejc, Mirko
Tomažič, Aleš
Norčič, Gregor
author_facet Grosek, Jan
Košir, Jurij Aleš
Novak, Jerica
Omejc, Mirko
Tomažič, Aleš
Norčič, Gregor
author_sort Grosek, Jan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to translate the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score into Slovenian and to test its validity on Slovenian patients who underwent low anterior rectal resection. METHODS: The LARS score was translated from English into Slovenian and then back-translated following international recommendations. The Slovenian version of the LARS questionnaire was completed by patients who underwent low anterior rectal resection between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2010 at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana. An anchor question assessing the impact of bowel function on lifestyle was included. To assess test-retest reliability, some of the patients answered the LARS score questionnaire twice. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (66.7%) of the 150 patients who were contacted for participation, were included in the final analysis. A total of 58 patients reported major LARS score. The LARS score was able to discriminate between patients who received radiotherapy and those who did not (p<0.001), and between total and partial mesorectal excision (p<0.001). Age was not associated with a greater LARS score (p=0.975). There was a perfect fit between the QoL category question and the LARS score in 66.0% of cases and a moderate fit was found in 24.0% of the cases, showing good convergent validity. Test-retest reliability of 51 patients showed a high intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: The Slovenian translation of the LARS score is a valid tool for measuring LARS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6778418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67784182019-10-21 Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery Grosek, Jan Košir, Jurij Aleš Novak, Jerica Omejc, Mirko Tomažič, Aleš Norčič, Gregor Zdr Varst Original Scientific Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to translate the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score into Slovenian and to test its validity on Slovenian patients who underwent low anterior rectal resection. METHODS: The LARS score was translated from English into Slovenian and then back-translated following international recommendations. The Slovenian version of the LARS questionnaire was completed by patients who underwent low anterior rectal resection between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2010 at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana. An anchor question assessing the impact of bowel function on lifestyle was included. To assess test-retest reliability, some of the patients answered the LARS score questionnaire twice. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (66.7%) of the 150 patients who were contacted for participation, were included in the final analysis. A total of 58 patients reported major LARS score. The LARS score was able to discriminate between patients who received radiotherapy and those who did not (p<0.001), and between total and partial mesorectal excision (p<0.001). Age was not associated with a greater LARS score (p=0.975). There was a perfect fit between the QoL category question and the LARS score in 66.0% of cases and a moderate fit was found in 24.0% of the cases, showing good convergent validity. Test-retest reliability of 51 patients showed a high intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: The Slovenian translation of the LARS score is a valid tool for measuring LARS. Sciendo 2019-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6778418/ /pubmed/31636722 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2019-0019 Text en © 2019 Jan Grosek, Jurij Aleš Košir, Jerica Novak, Mirko Omejc, Aleš Tomažič, Gregor Norčič, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Article
Grosek, Jan
Košir, Jurij Aleš
Novak, Jerica
Omejc, Mirko
Tomažič, Aleš
Norčič, Gregor
Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
title Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
title_full Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
title_fullStr Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
title_short Validation of The Slovenian Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score for Rectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
title_sort validation of the slovenian version of the low anterior resection syndrome score for rectal cancer patients after surgery
topic Original Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636722
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2019-0019
work_keys_str_mv AT grosekjan validationoftheslovenianversionofthelowanteriorresectionsyndromescoreforrectalcancerpatientsaftersurgery
AT kosirjurijales validationoftheslovenianversionofthelowanteriorresectionsyndromescoreforrectalcancerpatientsaftersurgery
AT novakjerica validationoftheslovenianversionofthelowanteriorresectionsyndromescoreforrectalcancerpatientsaftersurgery
AT omejcmirko validationoftheslovenianversionofthelowanteriorresectionsyndromescoreforrectalcancerpatientsaftersurgery
AT tomazicales validationoftheslovenianversionofthelowanteriorresectionsyndromescoreforrectalcancerpatientsaftersurgery
AT norcicgregor validationoftheslovenianversionofthelowanteriorresectionsyndromescoreforrectalcancerpatientsaftersurgery