Cargando…

Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review

Corneal pseudoguttata (PG), also known as pseudoguttae or secondary guttata, is a transient, reversible endothelial edema commonly associated with anterior segment pathology. While considered rare, PG presents on slit-lamp examination more commonly than originally thought. We have clinically observe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moshirfar, Majid, Y. Liu, Harry, Vaidyanathan, Uma, N. Somani, Anisha, C. Hopping, Grant, R. Barnes, James, B. Heiland, Madeline, B. Rosen, David, N. Motlagh, Mahsaw, C. Hoopes, Phillip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation Ophthalmology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598518
_version_ 1783456768747110400
author Moshirfar, Majid
Y. Liu, Harry
Vaidyanathan, Uma
N. Somani, Anisha
C. Hopping, Grant
R. Barnes, James
B. Heiland, Madeline
B. Rosen, David
N. Motlagh, Mahsaw
C. Hoopes, Phillip
author_facet Moshirfar, Majid
Y. Liu, Harry
Vaidyanathan, Uma
N. Somani, Anisha
C. Hopping, Grant
R. Barnes, James
B. Heiland, Madeline
B. Rosen, David
N. Motlagh, Mahsaw
C. Hoopes, Phillip
author_sort Moshirfar, Majid
collection PubMed
description Corneal pseudoguttata (PG), also known as pseudoguttae or secondary guttata, is a transient, reversible endothelial edema commonly associated with anterior segment pathology. While considered rare, PG presents on slit-lamp examination more commonly than originally thought. We have clinically observed PG after refractive surgeries, in association with infectious keratitis, and following medication use. PG presents as dark lesions on slit-lamp exam with specular illumination, similar to primary corneal guttata. PG is distinct from guttata because PG resolves over time and does not involve Descemet’s membrane. Other ocular findings that may be confused with guttata include endothelial blebs (EB) and endothelial denudation (ED). EB are possibly a type of PG that present after contact lens use or hypoxia. ED is a distinct entity that is characterized by loss of endothelial cells without involvement of Descemet’s membrane. Confocal microscopy may be useful in differentiating these four endothelial lesions, with differences in border definition and the presence of hyperreflective areas two main distinctions. PG presents as a hyporeflective, elevated shape without clear borders on confocal microscopy. PG, EB, and ED can resolve with time without the need for surgical intervention, unlike corneal guttata. Treatment of the underlying condition will lead to resolution of both PG and EB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6778462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67784622019-10-09 Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review Moshirfar, Majid Y. Liu, Harry Vaidyanathan, Uma N. Somani, Anisha C. Hopping, Grant R. Barnes, James B. Heiland, Madeline B. Rosen, David N. Motlagh, Mahsaw C. Hoopes, Phillip Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol Review Article Corneal pseudoguttata (PG), also known as pseudoguttae or secondary guttata, is a transient, reversible endothelial edema commonly associated with anterior segment pathology. While considered rare, PG presents on slit-lamp examination more commonly than originally thought. We have clinically observed PG after refractive surgeries, in association with infectious keratitis, and following medication use. PG presents as dark lesions on slit-lamp exam with specular illumination, similar to primary corneal guttata. PG is distinct from guttata because PG resolves over time and does not involve Descemet’s membrane. Other ocular findings that may be confused with guttata include endothelial blebs (EB) and endothelial denudation (ED). EB are possibly a type of PG that present after contact lens use or hypoxia. ED is a distinct entity that is characterized by loss of endothelial cells without involvement of Descemet’s membrane. Confocal microscopy may be useful in differentiating these four endothelial lesions, with differences in border definition and the presence of hyperreflective areas two main distinctions. PG presents as a hyporeflective, elevated shape without clear borders on confocal microscopy. PG, EB, and ED can resolve with time without the need for surgical intervention, unlike corneal guttata. Treatment of the underlying condition will lead to resolution of both PG and EB. Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation Ophthalmology 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6778462/ /pubmed/31598518 Text en © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Moshirfar, Majid
Y. Liu, Harry
Vaidyanathan, Uma
N. Somani, Anisha
C. Hopping, Grant
R. Barnes, James
B. Heiland, Madeline
B. Rosen, David
N. Motlagh, Mahsaw
C. Hoopes, Phillip
Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review
title Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review
title_full Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review
title_fullStr Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review
title_short Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review
title_sort diagnosis and management of pseudoguttata: a literature review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598518
work_keys_str_mv AT moshirfarmajid diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview
AT yliuharry diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview
AT vaidyanathanuma diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview
AT nsomanianisha diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview
AT choppinggrant diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview
AT rbarnesjames diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview
AT bheilandmadeline diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview
AT brosendavid diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview
AT nmotlaghmahsaw diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview
AT choopesphillip diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview