Cargando…
Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review
Corneal pseudoguttata (PG), also known as pseudoguttae or secondary guttata, is a transient, reversible endothelial edema commonly associated with anterior segment pathology. While considered rare, PG presents on slit-lamp examination more commonly than originally thought. We have clinically observe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation Ophthalmology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598518 |
_version_ | 1783456768747110400 |
---|---|
author | Moshirfar, Majid Y. Liu, Harry Vaidyanathan, Uma N. Somani, Anisha C. Hopping, Grant R. Barnes, James B. Heiland, Madeline B. Rosen, David N. Motlagh, Mahsaw C. Hoopes, Phillip |
author_facet | Moshirfar, Majid Y. Liu, Harry Vaidyanathan, Uma N. Somani, Anisha C. Hopping, Grant R. Barnes, James B. Heiland, Madeline B. Rosen, David N. Motlagh, Mahsaw C. Hoopes, Phillip |
author_sort | Moshirfar, Majid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Corneal pseudoguttata (PG), also known as pseudoguttae or secondary guttata, is a transient, reversible endothelial edema commonly associated with anterior segment pathology. While considered rare, PG presents on slit-lamp examination more commonly than originally thought. We have clinically observed PG after refractive surgeries, in association with infectious keratitis, and following medication use. PG presents as dark lesions on slit-lamp exam with specular illumination, similar to primary corneal guttata. PG is distinct from guttata because PG resolves over time and does not involve Descemet’s membrane. Other ocular findings that may be confused with guttata include endothelial blebs (EB) and endothelial denudation (ED). EB are possibly a type of PG that present after contact lens use or hypoxia. ED is a distinct entity that is characterized by loss of endothelial cells without involvement of Descemet’s membrane. Confocal microscopy may be useful in differentiating these four endothelial lesions, with differences in border definition and the presence of hyperreflective areas two main distinctions. PG presents as a hyporeflective, elevated shape without clear borders on confocal microscopy. PG, EB, and ED can resolve with time without the need for surgical intervention, unlike corneal guttata. Treatment of the underlying condition will lead to resolution of both PG and EB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6778462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67784622019-10-09 Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review Moshirfar, Majid Y. Liu, Harry Vaidyanathan, Uma N. Somani, Anisha C. Hopping, Grant R. Barnes, James B. Heiland, Madeline B. Rosen, David N. Motlagh, Mahsaw C. Hoopes, Phillip Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol Review Article Corneal pseudoguttata (PG), also known as pseudoguttae or secondary guttata, is a transient, reversible endothelial edema commonly associated with anterior segment pathology. While considered rare, PG presents on slit-lamp examination more commonly than originally thought. We have clinically observed PG after refractive surgeries, in association with infectious keratitis, and following medication use. PG presents as dark lesions on slit-lamp exam with specular illumination, similar to primary corneal guttata. PG is distinct from guttata because PG resolves over time and does not involve Descemet’s membrane. Other ocular findings that may be confused with guttata include endothelial blebs (EB) and endothelial denudation (ED). EB are possibly a type of PG that present after contact lens use or hypoxia. ED is a distinct entity that is characterized by loss of endothelial cells without involvement of Descemet’s membrane. Confocal microscopy may be useful in differentiating these four endothelial lesions, with differences in border definition and the presence of hyperreflective areas two main distinctions. PG presents as a hyporeflective, elevated shape without clear borders on confocal microscopy. PG, EB, and ED can resolve with time without the need for surgical intervention, unlike corneal guttata. Treatment of the underlying condition will lead to resolution of both PG and EB. Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation Ophthalmology 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6778462/ /pubmed/31598518 Text en © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Moshirfar, Majid Y. Liu, Harry Vaidyanathan, Uma N. Somani, Anisha C. Hopping, Grant R. Barnes, James B. Heiland, Madeline B. Rosen, David N. Motlagh, Mahsaw C. Hoopes, Phillip Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review |
title | Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review |
title_full | Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review |
title_short | Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review |
title_sort | diagnosis and management of pseudoguttata: a literature review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moshirfarmajid diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview AT yliuharry diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview AT vaidyanathanuma diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview AT nsomanianisha diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview AT choppinggrant diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview AT rbarnesjames diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview AT bheilandmadeline diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview AT brosendavid diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview AT nmotlaghmahsaw diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview AT choopesphillip diagnosisandmanagementofpseudoguttataaliteraturereview |