Cargando…

Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility

Infectious keratitis causes significant, financial burden and is only increasing in frequency with contact lens use. Despite this, no retrospective studies, prospective studies, or clinical trials have evaluated the diagnostic validity of clinical guidelines in cases of infectious keratitis. Current...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moshirfar, Majid, Hopping, Grant C., Vaidyanathan, Uma, Liu, Harry, Somani, Anisha N., Ronquillo, Yasmyne C., Hoopes, Phillip C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation Ophthalmology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598516
_version_ 1783456769208483840
author Moshirfar, Majid
Hopping, Grant C.
Vaidyanathan, Uma
Liu, Harry
Somani, Anisha N.
Ronquillo, Yasmyne C.
Hoopes, Phillip C.
author_facet Moshirfar, Majid
Hopping, Grant C.
Vaidyanathan, Uma
Liu, Harry
Somani, Anisha N.
Ronquillo, Yasmyne C.
Hoopes, Phillip C.
author_sort Moshirfar, Majid
collection PubMed
description Infectious keratitis causes significant, financial burden and is only increasing in frequency with contact lens use. Despite this, no retrospective studies, prospective studies, or clinical trials have evaluated the diagnostic validity of clinical guidelines in cases of infectious keratitis. Currently, standard of care recommends that corneal samples be obtained for staining and culturing in select patients showing evidence of corneal ulceration. Ideally, diagnostic information from corneal sampling is thought to help guide therapeutic interventions, prevent disease progression, reduce antibiotic resistance, and decrease overall expenditures for the management and treatment of infectious keratitis. However, current staining and culturing methods are limited by poor sensitivity in non-bacterial cases (i.e. fungal, viral) and lengthy turnaround times, and these methods do not frequently change clinical decision making. Newer fluoroquinolones and broad-spectrum antibiotics resolve the vast majority of cases of infectious keratitis, rendering cultures less essential for management. We studied the clinical utility of obtaining corneal samples for culturing and staining and the need for future research to establish superior diagnostic guidelines for their use in infectious keratitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6778464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67784642019-10-09 Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility Moshirfar, Majid Hopping, Grant C. Vaidyanathan, Uma Liu, Harry Somani, Anisha N. Ronquillo, Yasmyne C. Hoopes, Phillip C. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol Review Article Infectious keratitis causes significant, financial burden and is only increasing in frequency with contact lens use. Despite this, no retrospective studies, prospective studies, or clinical trials have evaluated the diagnostic validity of clinical guidelines in cases of infectious keratitis. Currently, standard of care recommends that corneal samples be obtained for staining and culturing in select patients showing evidence of corneal ulceration. Ideally, diagnostic information from corneal sampling is thought to help guide therapeutic interventions, prevent disease progression, reduce antibiotic resistance, and decrease overall expenditures for the management and treatment of infectious keratitis. However, current staining and culturing methods are limited by poor sensitivity in non-bacterial cases (i.e. fungal, viral) and lengthy turnaround times, and these methods do not frequently change clinical decision making. Newer fluoroquinolones and broad-spectrum antibiotics resolve the vast majority of cases of infectious keratitis, rendering cultures less essential for management. We studied the clinical utility of obtaining corneal samples for culturing and staining and the need for future research to establish superior diagnostic guidelines for their use in infectious keratitis. Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation Ophthalmology 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6778464/ /pubmed/31598516 Text en © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Moshirfar, Majid
Hopping, Grant C.
Vaidyanathan, Uma
Liu, Harry
Somani, Anisha N.
Ronquillo, Yasmyne C.
Hoopes, Phillip C.
Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility
title Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility
title_full Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility
title_fullStr Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility
title_full_unstemmed Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility
title_short Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility
title_sort biological staining and culturing in infectious keratitis: controversy in clinical utility
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598516
work_keys_str_mv AT moshirfarmajid biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility
AT hoppinggrantc biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility
AT vaidyanathanuma biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility
AT liuharry biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility
AT somanianishan biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility
AT ronquilloyasmynec biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility
AT hoopesphillipc biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility