Cargando…
Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility
Infectious keratitis causes significant, financial burden and is only increasing in frequency with contact lens use. Despite this, no retrospective studies, prospective studies, or clinical trials have evaluated the diagnostic validity of clinical guidelines in cases of infectious keratitis. Current...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation Ophthalmology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598516 |
_version_ | 1783456769208483840 |
---|---|
author | Moshirfar, Majid Hopping, Grant C. Vaidyanathan, Uma Liu, Harry Somani, Anisha N. Ronquillo, Yasmyne C. Hoopes, Phillip C. |
author_facet | Moshirfar, Majid Hopping, Grant C. Vaidyanathan, Uma Liu, Harry Somani, Anisha N. Ronquillo, Yasmyne C. Hoopes, Phillip C. |
author_sort | Moshirfar, Majid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Infectious keratitis causes significant, financial burden and is only increasing in frequency with contact lens use. Despite this, no retrospective studies, prospective studies, or clinical trials have evaluated the diagnostic validity of clinical guidelines in cases of infectious keratitis. Currently, standard of care recommends that corneal samples be obtained for staining and culturing in select patients showing evidence of corneal ulceration. Ideally, diagnostic information from corneal sampling is thought to help guide therapeutic interventions, prevent disease progression, reduce antibiotic resistance, and decrease overall expenditures for the management and treatment of infectious keratitis. However, current staining and culturing methods are limited by poor sensitivity in non-bacterial cases (i.e. fungal, viral) and lengthy turnaround times, and these methods do not frequently change clinical decision making. Newer fluoroquinolones and broad-spectrum antibiotics resolve the vast majority of cases of infectious keratitis, rendering cultures less essential for management. We studied the clinical utility of obtaining corneal samples for culturing and staining and the need for future research to establish superior diagnostic guidelines for their use in infectious keratitis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6778464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67784642019-10-09 Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility Moshirfar, Majid Hopping, Grant C. Vaidyanathan, Uma Liu, Harry Somani, Anisha N. Ronquillo, Yasmyne C. Hoopes, Phillip C. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol Review Article Infectious keratitis causes significant, financial burden and is only increasing in frequency with contact lens use. Despite this, no retrospective studies, prospective studies, or clinical trials have evaluated the diagnostic validity of clinical guidelines in cases of infectious keratitis. Currently, standard of care recommends that corneal samples be obtained for staining and culturing in select patients showing evidence of corneal ulceration. Ideally, diagnostic information from corneal sampling is thought to help guide therapeutic interventions, prevent disease progression, reduce antibiotic resistance, and decrease overall expenditures for the management and treatment of infectious keratitis. However, current staining and culturing methods are limited by poor sensitivity in non-bacterial cases (i.e. fungal, viral) and lengthy turnaround times, and these methods do not frequently change clinical decision making. Newer fluoroquinolones and broad-spectrum antibiotics resolve the vast majority of cases of infectious keratitis, rendering cultures less essential for management. We studied the clinical utility of obtaining corneal samples for culturing and staining and the need for future research to establish superior diagnostic guidelines for their use in infectious keratitis. Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation Ophthalmology 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6778464/ /pubmed/31598516 Text en © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Moshirfar, Majid Hopping, Grant C. Vaidyanathan, Uma Liu, Harry Somani, Anisha N. Ronquillo, Yasmyne C. Hoopes, Phillip C. Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility |
title | Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility |
title_full | Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility |
title_fullStr | Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility |
title_short | Biological Staining and Culturing in Infectious Keratitis: Controversy in Clinical Utility |
title_sort | biological staining and culturing in infectious keratitis: controversy in clinical utility |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598516 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moshirfarmajid biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility AT hoppinggrantc biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility AT vaidyanathanuma biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility AT liuharry biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility AT somanianishan biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility AT ronquilloyasmynec biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility AT hoopesphillipc biologicalstainingandculturingininfectiouskeratitiscontroversyinclinicalutility |