Cargando…

Improving sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of individual brainstem activation

Functional imaging of the brainstem may open new avenues for clinical diagnostics. However, for reliable assessments of brainstem activation, further efforts improving signal quality are needed. Six healthy subjects performed four repeated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sessions on dif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matt, Eva, Fischmeister, Florian Ph. S., Amini, Ahmad, Robinson, Simon D., Weber, Alexandra, Foki, Thomas, Gizewski, Elke R., Beisteiner, Roland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31435738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01936-3
_version_ 1783456777739698176
author Matt, Eva
Fischmeister, Florian Ph. S.
Amini, Ahmad
Robinson, Simon D.
Weber, Alexandra
Foki, Thomas
Gizewski, Elke R.
Beisteiner, Roland
author_facet Matt, Eva
Fischmeister, Florian Ph. S.
Amini, Ahmad
Robinson, Simon D.
Weber, Alexandra
Foki, Thomas
Gizewski, Elke R.
Beisteiner, Roland
author_sort Matt, Eva
collection PubMed
description Functional imaging of the brainstem may open new avenues for clinical diagnostics. However, for reliable assessments of brainstem activation, further efforts improving signal quality are needed. Six healthy subjects performed four repeated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sessions on different days with jaw clenching as a motor task to elicit activation in the trigeminal motor nucleus. Functional images were acquired with a 7 T MR scanner using an optimized multiband EPI sequence. Activation measures in the trigeminal nucleus and a control region were assessed using different physiological noise correction methods (aCompCor and RETROICOR-based approaches with variable numbers of regressors) combined with cerebrospinal fluid or brainstem masking. Receiver-operating characteristic analyses accounting for sensitivity and specificity, activation overlap analyses to estimate the reproducibility between sessions, and intraclass correlation analyses (ICC) for testing reliability between subjects and sessions were used to systematically compare the physiological noise correction approaches. Masking the brainstem led to increased activation in the target ROI and resulted in higher values for the area under the curve (AUC) as a combined measure for sensitivity and specificity. With the highest values for AUC, activation overlap, and ICC, the most favorable physiological noise correction method was to control for the cerebrospinal fluid time series (aCompCor with one regressor). Brainstem motor nuclei activation can be reliably identified using high-field fMRI with optimized acquisition and processing strategies—even on single-subject level. Applying specific physiological noise correction methods improves reproducibility and reliability of brainstem activation encouraging future clinical applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6778541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67785412019-10-17 Improving sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of individual brainstem activation Matt, Eva Fischmeister, Florian Ph. S. Amini, Ahmad Robinson, Simon D. Weber, Alexandra Foki, Thomas Gizewski, Elke R. Beisteiner, Roland Brain Struct Funct Original Article Functional imaging of the brainstem may open new avenues for clinical diagnostics. However, for reliable assessments of brainstem activation, further efforts improving signal quality are needed. Six healthy subjects performed four repeated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sessions on different days with jaw clenching as a motor task to elicit activation in the trigeminal motor nucleus. Functional images were acquired with a 7 T MR scanner using an optimized multiband EPI sequence. Activation measures in the trigeminal nucleus and a control region were assessed using different physiological noise correction methods (aCompCor and RETROICOR-based approaches with variable numbers of regressors) combined with cerebrospinal fluid or brainstem masking. Receiver-operating characteristic analyses accounting for sensitivity and specificity, activation overlap analyses to estimate the reproducibility between sessions, and intraclass correlation analyses (ICC) for testing reliability between subjects and sessions were used to systematically compare the physiological noise correction approaches. Masking the brainstem led to increased activation in the target ROI and resulted in higher values for the area under the curve (AUC) as a combined measure for sensitivity and specificity. With the highest values for AUC, activation overlap, and ICC, the most favorable physiological noise correction method was to control for the cerebrospinal fluid time series (aCompCor with one regressor). Brainstem motor nuclei activation can be reliably identified using high-field fMRI with optimized acquisition and processing strategies—even on single-subject level. Applying specific physiological noise correction methods improves reproducibility and reliability of brainstem activation encouraging future clinical applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-08-21 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6778541/ /pubmed/31435738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01936-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Matt, Eva
Fischmeister, Florian Ph. S.
Amini, Ahmad
Robinson, Simon D.
Weber, Alexandra
Foki, Thomas
Gizewski, Elke R.
Beisteiner, Roland
Improving sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of individual brainstem activation
title Improving sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of individual brainstem activation
title_full Improving sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of individual brainstem activation
title_fullStr Improving sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of individual brainstem activation
title_full_unstemmed Improving sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of individual brainstem activation
title_short Improving sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of individual brainstem activation
title_sort improving sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of individual brainstem activation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31435738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01936-3
work_keys_str_mv AT matteva improvingsensitivityspecificityandreproducibilityofindividualbrainstemactivation
AT fischmeisterflorianphs improvingsensitivityspecificityandreproducibilityofindividualbrainstemactivation
AT aminiahmad improvingsensitivityspecificityandreproducibilityofindividualbrainstemactivation
AT robinsonsimond improvingsensitivityspecificityandreproducibilityofindividualbrainstemactivation
AT weberalexandra improvingsensitivityspecificityandreproducibilityofindividualbrainstemactivation
AT fokithomas improvingsensitivityspecificityandreproducibilityofindividualbrainstemactivation
AT gizewskielker improvingsensitivityspecificityandreproducibilityofindividualbrainstemactivation
AT beisteinerroland improvingsensitivityspecificityandreproducibilityofindividualbrainstemactivation