Cargando…

Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the microleakage of Pedo Jacket crowns compared to stainless steel crowns (SSCs) cemented with different luting cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in-vitro experimental study, 80 primary molars were randomly divided into four groups of 20 each. Groups 1 an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sohrabi, Mona, Ghadimi, Sara, Seraj, Bahman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608334
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v16i1.1106
_version_ 1783456791516938240
author Sohrabi, Mona
Ghadimi, Sara
Seraj, Bahman
author_facet Sohrabi, Mona
Ghadimi, Sara
Seraj, Bahman
author_sort Sohrabi, Mona
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the microleakage of Pedo Jacket crowns compared to stainless steel crowns (SSCs) cemented with different luting cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in-vitro experimental study, 80 primary molars were randomly divided into four groups of 20 each. Groups 1 and 2 were subjected to standard tooth preparation for SSC. Crowns in group 1 were cemented with glass ionomer (GI), and crowns in group 2 were cemented with a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) cement. In groups 3 and 4, minimal tooth preparation was performed for Pedo Jacket crowns, and the crowns were cemented with RMGI and Panavia resin cement, respectively. Microleakage was measured at mesial and distal surfaces in micrometers (μm), and the mean value for each tooth was calculated. Oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to compare the microleakage of the four groups. RESULTS: Group 3 (Pedo Jacket cemented with RMGI) showed the highest microleakage (1523.83±250.32 μm) with significant differences with the remaining three groups (P<0.001). Microleakage in group 4 (Pedo Jacket cemented with Panavia) was significantly lower than that in the other three groups (301.25±219.53 μm, P<0.001). Groups 1 (SSCs cemented with GI) and 2 (SSCs cemented with RMGI) were not significantly different in terms of microleakage (P=0.49) although group 1 showed slightly higher microleakage than group 2 (598.43±260.85 μm versus 500.25±124.74 μm). CONCLUSION: Pedo Jacket crowns can serve as an acceptable esthetic alternative to SSCs if cemented with resin cements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6778613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67786132019-10-11 Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements Sohrabi, Mona Ghadimi, Sara Seraj, Bahman Front Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the microleakage of Pedo Jacket crowns compared to stainless steel crowns (SSCs) cemented with different luting cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in-vitro experimental study, 80 primary molars were randomly divided into four groups of 20 each. Groups 1 and 2 were subjected to standard tooth preparation for SSC. Crowns in group 1 were cemented with glass ionomer (GI), and crowns in group 2 were cemented with a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) cement. In groups 3 and 4, minimal tooth preparation was performed for Pedo Jacket crowns, and the crowns were cemented with RMGI and Panavia resin cement, respectively. Microleakage was measured at mesial and distal surfaces in micrometers (μm), and the mean value for each tooth was calculated. Oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to compare the microleakage of the four groups. RESULTS: Group 3 (Pedo Jacket cemented with RMGI) showed the highest microleakage (1523.83±250.32 μm) with significant differences with the remaining three groups (P<0.001). Microleakage in group 4 (Pedo Jacket cemented with Panavia) was significantly lower than that in the other three groups (301.25±219.53 μm, P<0.001). Groups 1 (SSCs cemented with GI) and 2 (SSCs cemented with RMGI) were not significantly different in terms of microleakage (P=0.49) although group 1 showed slightly higher microleakage than group 2 (598.43±260.85 μm versus 500.25±124.74 μm). CONCLUSION: Pedo Jacket crowns can serve as an acceptable esthetic alternative to SSCs if cemented with resin cements. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2019 2019-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6778613/ /pubmed/31608334 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v16i1.1106 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is published as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sohrabi, Mona
Ghadimi, Sara
Seraj, Bahman
Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements
title Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements
title_full Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements
title_fullStr Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements
title_short Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements
title_sort comparison of microleakage of pedo jacket crowns and stainless steel crowns cemented with different cements
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608334
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v16i1.1106
work_keys_str_mv AT sohrabimona comparisonofmicroleakageofpedojacketcrownsandstainlesssteelcrownscementedwithdifferentcements
AT ghadimisara comparisonofmicroleakageofpedojacketcrownsandstainlesssteelcrownscementedwithdifferentcements
AT serajbahman comparisonofmicroleakageofpedojacketcrownsandstainlesssteelcrownscementedwithdifferentcements