Cargando…

Volumetric Assessment of Root Canal Obturation Using 3% Nano-Chitosan versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) and Iodoform-Calcium Hydroxide (Metapex), in Primary Root Canals Shaped with Rotary versus Manual Methods: A Preliminary In-Vitro Spiral CT Study

OBJECTIVES: In this study, chitosan was introduced and used as a substitute for pulpectomy obturation against conventional materials: zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) and iodoform-calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)(2)). Efficacies of rotary versus manual instrumentations were also compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babashahi, Elahe, Kartalaie, Maryam Mohmadi, Basir, Leila, Rakhshan, Vahid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608336
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v16i1.1108
_version_ 1783456791775936512
author Babashahi, Elahe
Kartalaie, Maryam Mohmadi
Basir, Leila
Rakhshan, Vahid
author_facet Babashahi, Elahe
Kartalaie, Maryam Mohmadi
Basir, Leila
Rakhshan, Vahid
author_sort Babashahi, Elahe
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In this study, chitosan was introduced and used as a substitute for pulpectomy obturation against conventional materials: zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) and iodoform-calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)(2)). Efficacies of rotary versus manual instrumentations were also compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This preliminary study was performed on 152 intact nonresorbed root canals of primary molars divided into rotary (n=78) versus hand-instrumentation (n=74) and into ZOE (n=53), iodoform-Ca(OH)(2) (n=50), and 3% nano-chitosan (n=49). Canals were cleaned/shaped using hand or rotary files. Canal spaces were measured using spiral computed tomography and obturated using the three materials. The percentages of obturation volume (POV) were estimated. Rotary and manual instrumentations were compared in terms of canal spaces before and after obturation. Three obturation materials were also compared regarding canal spaces after obturation (α=0.05). RESULTS: Average POVs of materials were 96.54% (ZOE), 97.87% (Metapex), and 74.74% (nano-chitosan; P=0.000). POV of chitosan differed from the other two (P<0.001) but the other two were similar (P=0.896). Average POVs were 91.46% (manual) and 88.51% (rotary); the difference was not significant (P=0.322). Preobturation spaces of canals for different methods were 3.89 mm (3) (manual) and 3.26 mm (3) (rotary); the difference was significant (P=0.013). Two-way ANCOVA showed a significant effect of materials (P<0.001) but not root length (P=0.585) or shaping methods (P=0.362) on POVs. CONCLUSION: Nano-chitosan showed a considerable success rate but it still needs reformulation as it was weaker than the extremely successful commercial competitors. Rotary instrumentation can provide results similar to hand-filing in terms of POV although it might yield smaller canals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6778614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67786142019-10-11 Volumetric Assessment of Root Canal Obturation Using 3% Nano-Chitosan versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) and Iodoform-Calcium Hydroxide (Metapex), in Primary Root Canals Shaped with Rotary versus Manual Methods: A Preliminary In-Vitro Spiral CT Study Babashahi, Elahe Kartalaie, Maryam Mohmadi Basir, Leila Rakhshan, Vahid Front Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: In this study, chitosan was introduced and used as a substitute for pulpectomy obturation against conventional materials: zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) and iodoform-calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)(2)). Efficacies of rotary versus manual instrumentations were also compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This preliminary study was performed on 152 intact nonresorbed root canals of primary molars divided into rotary (n=78) versus hand-instrumentation (n=74) and into ZOE (n=53), iodoform-Ca(OH)(2) (n=50), and 3% nano-chitosan (n=49). Canals were cleaned/shaped using hand or rotary files. Canal spaces were measured using spiral computed tomography and obturated using the three materials. The percentages of obturation volume (POV) were estimated. Rotary and manual instrumentations were compared in terms of canal spaces before and after obturation. Three obturation materials were also compared regarding canal spaces after obturation (α=0.05). RESULTS: Average POVs of materials were 96.54% (ZOE), 97.87% (Metapex), and 74.74% (nano-chitosan; P=0.000). POV of chitosan differed from the other two (P<0.001) but the other two were similar (P=0.896). Average POVs were 91.46% (manual) and 88.51% (rotary); the difference was not significant (P=0.322). Preobturation spaces of canals for different methods were 3.89 mm (3) (manual) and 3.26 mm (3) (rotary); the difference was significant (P=0.013). Two-way ANCOVA showed a significant effect of materials (P<0.001) but not root length (P=0.585) or shaping methods (P=0.362) on POVs. CONCLUSION: Nano-chitosan showed a considerable success rate but it still needs reformulation as it was weaker than the extremely successful commercial competitors. Rotary instrumentation can provide results similar to hand-filing in terms of POV although it might yield smaller canals. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2019 2019-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6778614/ /pubmed/31608336 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v16i1.1108 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is published as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Babashahi, Elahe
Kartalaie, Maryam Mohmadi
Basir, Leila
Rakhshan, Vahid
Volumetric Assessment of Root Canal Obturation Using 3% Nano-Chitosan versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) and Iodoform-Calcium Hydroxide (Metapex), in Primary Root Canals Shaped with Rotary versus Manual Methods: A Preliminary In-Vitro Spiral CT Study
title Volumetric Assessment of Root Canal Obturation Using 3% Nano-Chitosan versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) and Iodoform-Calcium Hydroxide (Metapex), in Primary Root Canals Shaped with Rotary versus Manual Methods: A Preliminary In-Vitro Spiral CT Study
title_full Volumetric Assessment of Root Canal Obturation Using 3% Nano-Chitosan versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) and Iodoform-Calcium Hydroxide (Metapex), in Primary Root Canals Shaped with Rotary versus Manual Methods: A Preliminary In-Vitro Spiral CT Study
title_fullStr Volumetric Assessment of Root Canal Obturation Using 3% Nano-Chitosan versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) and Iodoform-Calcium Hydroxide (Metapex), in Primary Root Canals Shaped with Rotary versus Manual Methods: A Preliminary In-Vitro Spiral CT Study
title_full_unstemmed Volumetric Assessment of Root Canal Obturation Using 3% Nano-Chitosan versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) and Iodoform-Calcium Hydroxide (Metapex), in Primary Root Canals Shaped with Rotary versus Manual Methods: A Preliminary In-Vitro Spiral CT Study
title_short Volumetric Assessment of Root Canal Obturation Using 3% Nano-Chitosan versus Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) and Iodoform-Calcium Hydroxide (Metapex), in Primary Root Canals Shaped with Rotary versus Manual Methods: A Preliminary In-Vitro Spiral CT Study
title_sort volumetric assessment of root canal obturation using 3% nano-chitosan versus zinc oxide eugenol (zoe) and iodoform-calcium hydroxide (metapex), in primary root canals shaped with rotary versus manual methods: a preliminary in-vitro spiral ct study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608336
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v16i1.1108
work_keys_str_mv AT babashahielahe volumetricassessmentofrootcanalobturationusing3nanochitosanversuszincoxideeugenolzoeandiodoformcalciumhydroxidemetapexinprimaryrootcanalsshapedwithrotaryversusmanualmethodsapreliminaryinvitrospiralctstudy
AT kartalaiemaryammohmadi volumetricassessmentofrootcanalobturationusing3nanochitosanversuszincoxideeugenolzoeandiodoformcalciumhydroxidemetapexinprimaryrootcanalsshapedwithrotaryversusmanualmethodsapreliminaryinvitrospiralctstudy
AT basirleila volumetricassessmentofrootcanalobturationusing3nanochitosanversuszincoxideeugenolzoeandiodoformcalciumhydroxidemetapexinprimaryrootcanalsshapedwithrotaryversusmanualmethodsapreliminaryinvitrospiralctstudy
AT rakhshanvahid volumetricassessmentofrootcanalobturationusing3nanochitosanversuszincoxideeugenolzoeandiodoformcalciumhydroxidemetapexinprimaryrootcanalsshapedwithrotaryversusmanualmethodsapreliminaryinvitrospiralctstudy