Cargando…

Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula

PURPOSE: To compare the preoperative measurements of the anterior chamber depth (ACD) by the IOLMaster and Catalys; additionally, to compare the accuracy of the IOL power calculated by the Barrett Universal II formula using the two different measurements. SETTING: University of California, Irvine, G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muniz Castro, Hannah, Tai, Audrey X., Sampson, Samuel J., Wade, Matthew, Farid, Marjan, Garg, Sumit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8172615
_version_ 1783456840406794240
author Muniz Castro, Hannah
Tai, Audrey X.
Sampson, Samuel J.
Wade, Matthew
Farid, Marjan
Garg, Sumit
author_facet Muniz Castro, Hannah
Tai, Audrey X.
Sampson, Samuel J.
Wade, Matthew
Farid, Marjan
Garg, Sumit
author_sort Muniz Castro, Hannah
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the preoperative measurements of the anterior chamber depth (ACD) by the IOLMaster and Catalys; additionally, to compare the accuracy of the IOL power calculated by the Barrett Universal II formula using the two different measurements. SETTING: University of California, Irvine, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute in Irvine, California. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. METHODS: This study included 144 eyes of 90 patients with a mean age of 72.0 years (range 40.8 to 92.1 years) that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using Catalys. Preoperative measurements of ACD were taken by the IOLMaster and Catalys. Manifest refraction and refractive spherical equivalent were measured 1 month postoperatively. Expected refractive results were compared with actual postoperative refractive results. RESULTS: The correlation between the ACD values from the two devices was good (r = 0.80). The Catalys ACD measurements yielded a larger ACD compared to the IOLMaster, with a mean difference of 0.22 mm (P < 0.0001). The correlation between the postoperative and predicted RSE of the implanted IOL power was excellent (r = 0.96). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean absolute error derived from the IOLMaster, 0.37 diopter (D) ± 0.34 (SD), and the Catalys, 0.37 ± 0.35 D (P=0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The Catalys biometry yielded a significantly larger ACD value than the IOLMaster. This difference in ACD value, however, did not reflect in a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation and refractive prediction error using the Barrett Universal II Formula.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6778875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67788752019-10-29 Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula Muniz Castro, Hannah Tai, Audrey X. Sampson, Samuel J. Wade, Matthew Farid, Marjan Garg, Sumit J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To compare the preoperative measurements of the anterior chamber depth (ACD) by the IOLMaster and Catalys; additionally, to compare the accuracy of the IOL power calculated by the Barrett Universal II formula using the two different measurements. SETTING: University of California, Irvine, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute in Irvine, California. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. METHODS: This study included 144 eyes of 90 patients with a mean age of 72.0 years (range 40.8 to 92.1 years) that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using Catalys. Preoperative measurements of ACD were taken by the IOLMaster and Catalys. Manifest refraction and refractive spherical equivalent were measured 1 month postoperatively. Expected refractive results were compared with actual postoperative refractive results. RESULTS: The correlation between the ACD values from the two devices was good (r = 0.80). The Catalys ACD measurements yielded a larger ACD compared to the IOLMaster, with a mean difference of 0.22 mm (P < 0.0001). The correlation between the postoperative and predicted RSE of the implanted IOL power was excellent (r = 0.96). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean absolute error derived from the IOLMaster, 0.37 diopter (D) ± 0.34 (SD), and the Catalys, 0.37 ± 0.35 D (P=0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The Catalys biometry yielded a significantly larger ACD value than the IOLMaster. This difference in ACD value, however, did not reflect in a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation and refractive prediction error using the Barrett Universal II Formula. Hindawi 2019-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6778875/ /pubmed/31662898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8172615 Text en Copyright © 2019 Hannah Muniz Castro et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Muniz Castro, Hannah
Tai, Audrey X.
Sampson, Samuel J.
Wade, Matthew
Farid, Marjan
Garg, Sumit
Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula
title Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula
title_full Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula
title_fullStr Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula
title_short Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula
title_sort accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using anterior chamber depth from two devices with barrett universal ii formula
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8172615
work_keys_str_mv AT munizcastrohannah accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationusinganteriorchamberdepthfromtwodeviceswithbarrettuniversaliiformula
AT taiaudreyx accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationusinganteriorchamberdepthfromtwodeviceswithbarrettuniversaliiformula
AT sampsonsamuelj accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationusinganteriorchamberdepthfromtwodeviceswithbarrettuniversaliiformula
AT wadematthew accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationusinganteriorchamberdepthfromtwodeviceswithbarrettuniversaliiformula
AT faridmarjan accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationusinganteriorchamberdepthfromtwodeviceswithbarrettuniversaliiformula
AT gargsumit accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationusinganteriorchamberdepthfromtwodeviceswithbarrettuniversaliiformula