Cargando…
Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula
PURPOSE: To compare the preoperative measurements of the anterior chamber depth (ACD) by the IOLMaster and Catalys; additionally, to compare the accuracy of the IOL power calculated by the Barrett Universal II formula using the two different measurements. SETTING: University of California, Irvine, G...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8172615 |
_version_ | 1783456840406794240 |
---|---|
author | Muniz Castro, Hannah Tai, Audrey X. Sampson, Samuel J. Wade, Matthew Farid, Marjan Garg, Sumit |
author_facet | Muniz Castro, Hannah Tai, Audrey X. Sampson, Samuel J. Wade, Matthew Farid, Marjan Garg, Sumit |
author_sort | Muniz Castro, Hannah |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the preoperative measurements of the anterior chamber depth (ACD) by the IOLMaster and Catalys; additionally, to compare the accuracy of the IOL power calculated by the Barrett Universal II formula using the two different measurements. SETTING: University of California, Irvine, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute in Irvine, California. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. METHODS: This study included 144 eyes of 90 patients with a mean age of 72.0 years (range 40.8 to 92.1 years) that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using Catalys. Preoperative measurements of ACD were taken by the IOLMaster and Catalys. Manifest refraction and refractive spherical equivalent were measured 1 month postoperatively. Expected refractive results were compared with actual postoperative refractive results. RESULTS: The correlation between the ACD values from the two devices was good (r = 0.80). The Catalys ACD measurements yielded a larger ACD compared to the IOLMaster, with a mean difference of 0.22 mm (P < 0.0001). The correlation between the postoperative and predicted RSE of the implanted IOL power was excellent (r = 0.96). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean absolute error derived from the IOLMaster, 0.37 diopter (D) ± 0.34 (SD), and the Catalys, 0.37 ± 0.35 D (P=0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The Catalys biometry yielded a significantly larger ACD value than the IOLMaster. This difference in ACD value, however, did not reflect in a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation and refractive prediction error using the Barrett Universal II Formula. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6778875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67788752019-10-29 Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula Muniz Castro, Hannah Tai, Audrey X. Sampson, Samuel J. Wade, Matthew Farid, Marjan Garg, Sumit J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To compare the preoperative measurements of the anterior chamber depth (ACD) by the IOLMaster and Catalys; additionally, to compare the accuracy of the IOL power calculated by the Barrett Universal II formula using the two different measurements. SETTING: University of California, Irvine, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute in Irvine, California. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. METHODS: This study included 144 eyes of 90 patients with a mean age of 72.0 years (range 40.8 to 92.1 years) that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using Catalys. Preoperative measurements of ACD were taken by the IOLMaster and Catalys. Manifest refraction and refractive spherical equivalent were measured 1 month postoperatively. Expected refractive results were compared with actual postoperative refractive results. RESULTS: The correlation between the ACD values from the two devices was good (r = 0.80). The Catalys ACD measurements yielded a larger ACD compared to the IOLMaster, with a mean difference of 0.22 mm (P < 0.0001). The correlation between the postoperative and predicted RSE of the implanted IOL power was excellent (r = 0.96). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean absolute error derived from the IOLMaster, 0.37 diopter (D) ± 0.34 (SD), and the Catalys, 0.37 ± 0.35 D (P=0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The Catalys biometry yielded a significantly larger ACD value than the IOLMaster. This difference in ACD value, however, did not reflect in a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation and refractive prediction error using the Barrett Universal II Formula. Hindawi 2019-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6778875/ /pubmed/31662898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8172615 Text en Copyright © 2019 Hannah Muniz Castro et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Muniz Castro, Hannah Tai, Audrey X. Sampson, Samuel J. Wade, Matthew Farid, Marjan Garg, Sumit Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula |
title | Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula |
title_full | Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula |
title_short | Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula |
title_sort | accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using anterior chamber depth from two devices with barrett universal ii formula |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31662898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8172615 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munizcastrohannah accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationusinganteriorchamberdepthfromtwodeviceswithbarrettuniversaliiformula AT taiaudreyx accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationusinganteriorchamberdepthfromtwodeviceswithbarrettuniversaliiformula AT sampsonsamuelj accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationusinganteriorchamberdepthfromtwodeviceswithbarrettuniversaliiformula AT wadematthew accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationusinganteriorchamberdepthfromtwodeviceswithbarrettuniversaliiformula AT faridmarjan accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationusinganteriorchamberdepthfromtwodeviceswithbarrettuniversaliiformula AT gargsumit accuracyofintraocularlenspowercalculationusinganteriorchamberdepthfromtwodeviceswithbarrettuniversaliiformula |