Cargando…

Where do patients with MRI-confirmed single-level radiculopathy experience pain, and what is the clinical interpretability of these pain patterns? A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study

BACKGROUND: Clinicians nominate the distribution of leg pain as being important in diagnosing nerve root involvement. This study aimed to identify: (i) common unisegmental radicular pain patterns and whether they were dermatomal, and (ii) whether these radicular pain patterns assisted clinician disc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albert, Hanne B., Hansen, Jeanette Kaae, Søgaard, Helle, Kent, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0273-8
_version_ 1783456863298256896
author Albert, Hanne B.
Hansen, Jeanette Kaae
Søgaard, Helle
Kent, Peter
author_facet Albert, Hanne B.
Hansen, Jeanette Kaae
Søgaard, Helle
Kent, Peter
author_sort Albert, Hanne B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinicians nominate the distribution of leg pain as being important in diagnosing nerve root involvement. This study aimed to identify: (i) common unisegmental radicular pain patterns and whether they were dermatomal, and (ii) whether these radicular pain patterns assisted clinician discrimination of the nerve root level involved. METHODS: A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study of adult patients with radicular leg pain at a hospital in Denmark. All patients had positive neurological signs (average 2.8 signs - hypoalgesia, diminished reflexes, muscle weakness, positive Straight Leg Raise test). Part 1 (pain patterns) was a secondary analysis of baseline pain pattern data collected during a clinical trial. The pain charts of 93 patients with an MRI and clinically confirmed single-level disc herniation with nerve root compression were digitised and layered to form a composite picture of the radicular patterns for the L5 and S1 nerve roots, which were then compared to published dermatomes. In Part 2 (clinical utility) we prospectively measured the discriminative ability of the identified pain patterns. The accuracy was calculated of three groups of six clinicians at classifying the nerve root affected in a randomized sequence of 53 patients, when not shown, briefly shown or continuously shown the composite pain patterns. In each group were two chiropractors, two medical doctors and two physiotherapists. RESULTS: There was a wide overlap in pain patterns from compromised L5 and S1 nerve roots but some distinguishing features. These pain patterns had approximately 50 to 80% overlap with published dermatomes. Clinicians were unable to determine with any accuracy above chance whether an individual pain drawing was from a person with a compromised L5 or S1 nerve root, and use of the composite pain drawings did not improve that accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: While pain distribution may be an indication of radiculopathy, pain patterns from L5 or S1 nerve root compression only approximated those of sensory dermatomes, and level-specific knowledge about radicular pain patterns did not assist clinicians’ diagnostic accuracy of the nerve root impinged. These results indicate that, on their own, pain patterns provide very limited additional diagnostic information about which individual nerve root is affected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6778979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67789792019-10-11 Where do patients with MRI-confirmed single-level radiculopathy experience pain, and what is the clinical interpretability of these pain patterns? A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study Albert, Hanne B. Hansen, Jeanette Kaae Søgaard, Helle Kent, Peter Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: Clinicians nominate the distribution of leg pain as being important in diagnosing nerve root involvement. This study aimed to identify: (i) common unisegmental radicular pain patterns and whether they were dermatomal, and (ii) whether these radicular pain patterns assisted clinician discrimination of the nerve root level involved. METHODS: A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study of adult patients with radicular leg pain at a hospital in Denmark. All patients had positive neurological signs (average 2.8 signs - hypoalgesia, diminished reflexes, muscle weakness, positive Straight Leg Raise test). Part 1 (pain patterns) was a secondary analysis of baseline pain pattern data collected during a clinical trial. The pain charts of 93 patients with an MRI and clinically confirmed single-level disc herniation with nerve root compression were digitised and layered to form a composite picture of the radicular patterns for the L5 and S1 nerve roots, which were then compared to published dermatomes. In Part 2 (clinical utility) we prospectively measured the discriminative ability of the identified pain patterns. The accuracy was calculated of three groups of six clinicians at classifying the nerve root affected in a randomized sequence of 53 patients, when not shown, briefly shown or continuously shown the composite pain patterns. In each group were two chiropractors, two medical doctors and two physiotherapists. RESULTS: There was a wide overlap in pain patterns from compromised L5 and S1 nerve roots but some distinguishing features. These pain patterns had approximately 50 to 80% overlap with published dermatomes. Clinicians were unable to determine with any accuracy above chance whether an individual pain drawing was from a person with a compromised L5 or S1 nerve root, and use of the composite pain drawings did not improve that accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: While pain distribution may be an indication of radiculopathy, pain patterns from L5 or S1 nerve root compression only approximated those of sensory dermatomes, and level-specific knowledge about radicular pain patterns did not assist clinicians’ diagnostic accuracy of the nerve root impinged. These results indicate that, on their own, pain patterns provide very limited additional diagnostic information about which individual nerve root is affected. BioMed Central 2019-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6778979/ /pubmed/31608144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0273-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Albert, Hanne B.
Hansen, Jeanette Kaae
Søgaard, Helle
Kent, Peter
Where do patients with MRI-confirmed single-level radiculopathy experience pain, and what is the clinical interpretability of these pain patterns? A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study
title Where do patients with MRI-confirmed single-level radiculopathy experience pain, and what is the clinical interpretability of these pain patterns? A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study
title_full Where do patients with MRI-confirmed single-level radiculopathy experience pain, and what is the clinical interpretability of these pain patterns? A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study
title_fullStr Where do patients with MRI-confirmed single-level radiculopathy experience pain, and what is the clinical interpretability of these pain patterns? A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study
title_full_unstemmed Where do patients with MRI-confirmed single-level radiculopathy experience pain, and what is the clinical interpretability of these pain patterns? A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study
title_short Where do patients with MRI-confirmed single-level radiculopathy experience pain, and what is the clinical interpretability of these pain patterns? A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study
title_sort where do patients with mri-confirmed single-level radiculopathy experience pain, and what is the clinical interpretability of these pain patterns? a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6778979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0273-8
work_keys_str_mv AT alberthanneb wheredopatientswithmriconfirmedsinglelevelradiculopathyexperiencepainandwhatistheclinicalinterpretabilityofthesepainpatternsacrosssectionaldiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT hansenjeanettekaae wheredopatientswithmriconfirmedsinglelevelradiculopathyexperiencepainandwhatistheclinicalinterpretabilityofthesepainpatternsacrosssectionaldiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT søgaardhelle wheredopatientswithmriconfirmedsinglelevelradiculopathyexperiencepainandwhatistheclinicalinterpretabilityofthesepainpatternsacrosssectionaldiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT kentpeter wheredopatientswithmriconfirmedsinglelevelradiculopathyexperiencepainandwhatistheclinicalinterpretabilityofthesepainpatternsacrosssectionaldiagnosticaccuracystudy