Cargando…

Do Preys Prey on Their Predators? Confusion over Predatory “Hage-taka” Journals

For the last several years, predatory journals have been a topic of discussion in top scientific journals, such as Nature. Predatory journals are problematic because they create public mistrust of scientific publication as a whole by the mass production of non-credible publications with the sole aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takabe, Kazuaki, Nagahashi, Masayuki, Butash, Ali L., Wakai, Toshifumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Medical Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6779052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31592226
http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2019-0011
Descripción
Sumario:For the last several years, predatory journals have been a topic of discussion in top scientific journals, such as Nature. Predatory journals are problematic because they create public mistrust of scientific publication as a whole by the mass production of non-credible publications with the sole aim of profit. Recently, articles in a Japanese newspaper and online articles exposed domestic institutions for the number of publications in predatory journals, saying that they “abused predatory journals to increase the number of their publications and falsely inflate their academic achievements.” We do not subscribe to this point of view because publications in predatory journals do not count as scholarly achievements, and we believe it is an information literacy problem. We feel strongly that it is both important and beneficial for the readers of The Japan Medical Association Journal to be aware of and understand this issue.