Cargando…
Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study
OBJECTIVE: Adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV infection has been slow. The purpose of this study was to evaluate knowledge, attitudes and referral practices for PrEP among non-prescribing providers, who may play key role. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey on PrEP...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6779237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31589632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223486 |
_version_ | 1783456899109224448 |
---|---|
author | Kundu, Iman Martinez-Donate, Ana Karkada, Navya Roth, Alexis Felsher, Marisa Sandling, Marcus Szep, Zsofia |
author_facet | Kundu, Iman Martinez-Donate, Ana Karkada, Navya Roth, Alexis Felsher, Marisa Sandling, Marcus Szep, Zsofia |
author_sort | Kundu, Iman |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV infection has been slow. The purpose of this study was to evaluate knowledge, attitudes and referral practices for PrEP among non-prescribing providers, who may play key role. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey on PrEP knowledge, attitudes, and referral practices among 66 non-prescribing HIV prevention providers (1st August to 31st December, 2016), in Philadelphia, followed by qualitative interviews with 12 of them (5th April to 10th May, 2017). RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 36 years, with 62% females. Majority were HIV case managers and rapid testers. For half of the respondents, PrEP eligibility screening was part of rapid HIV testing at their organization, 40% never had PrEP training and only 27% indicated personally screening clients for eligibility. Qualitative data revealed that participants held positive attitudes about PrEP and perceived organizational support, but had concerns about potential negative impacts and barriers to routine HIV screening. CONCLUSION: Results highlight the importance of training non-prescribing HIV prevention providers about PrEP, addressing their concerns, and incorporating PrEP screening and referral into routine HIV testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6779237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67792372019-10-19 Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study Kundu, Iman Martinez-Donate, Ana Karkada, Navya Roth, Alexis Felsher, Marisa Sandling, Marcus Szep, Zsofia PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV infection has been slow. The purpose of this study was to evaluate knowledge, attitudes and referral practices for PrEP among non-prescribing providers, who may play key role. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey on PrEP knowledge, attitudes, and referral practices among 66 non-prescribing HIV prevention providers (1st August to 31st December, 2016), in Philadelphia, followed by qualitative interviews with 12 of them (5th April to 10th May, 2017). RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 36 years, with 62% females. Majority were HIV case managers and rapid testers. For half of the respondents, PrEP eligibility screening was part of rapid HIV testing at their organization, 40% never had PrEP training and only 27% indicated personally screening clients for eligibility. Qualitative data revealed that participants held positive attitudes about PrEP and perceived organizational support, but had concerns about potential negative impacts and barriers to routine HIV screening. CONCLUSION: Results highlight the importance of training non-prescribing HIV prevention providers about PrEP, addressing their concerns, and incorporating PrEP screening and referral into routine HIV testing. Public Library of Science 2019-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6779237/ /pubmed/31589632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223486 Text en © 2019 Kundu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kundu, Iman Martinez-Donate, Ana Karkada, Navya Roth, Alexis Felsher, Marisa Sandling, Marcus Szep, Zsofia Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study |
title | Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study |
title_full | Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study |
title_short | Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study |
title_sort | attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (prep) among hiv rapid testers and case managers in philadelphia: a mixed methods study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6779237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31589632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223486 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kunduiman attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy AT martinezdonateana attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy AT karkadanavya attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy AT rothalexis attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy AT felshermarisa attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy AT sandlingmarcus attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy AT szepzsofia attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy |