Cargando…

Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study

OBJECTIVE: Adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV infection has been slow. The purpose of this study was to evaluate knowledge, attitudes and referral practices for PrEP among non-prescribing providers, who may play key role. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey on PrEP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kundu, Iman, Martinez-Donate, Ana, Karkada, Navya, Roth, Alexis, Felsher, Marisa, Sandling, Marcus, Szep, Zsofia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6779237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31589632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223486
_version_ 1783456899109224448
author Kundu, Iman
Martinez-Donate, Ana
Karkada, Navya
Roth, Alexis
Felsher, Marisa
Sandling, Marcus
Szep, Zsofia
author_facet Kundu, Iman
Martinez-Donate, Ana
Karkada, Navya
Roth, Alexis
Felsher, Marisa
Sandling, Marcus
Szep, Zsofia
author_sort Kundu, Iman
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV infection has been slow. The purpose of this study was to evaluate knowledge, attitudes and referral practices for PrEP among non-prescribing providers, who may play key role. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey on PrEP knowledge, attitudes, and referral practices among 66 non-prescribing HIV prevention providers (1st August to 31st December, 2016), in Philadelphia, followed by qualitative interviews with 12 of them (5th April to 10th May, 2017). RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 36 years, with 62% females. Majority were HIV case managers and rapid testers. For half of the respondents, PrEP eligibility screening was part of rapid HIV testing at their organization, 40% never had PrEP training and only 27% indicated personally screening clients for eligibility. Qualitative data revealed that participants held positive attitudes about PrEP and perceived organizational support, but had concerns about potential negative impacts and barriers to routine HIV screening. CONCLUSION: Results highlight the importance of training non-prescribing HIV prevention providers about PrEP, addressing their concerns, and incorporating PrEP screening and referral into routine HIV testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6779237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67792372019-10-19 Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study Kundu, Iman Martinez-Donate, Ana Karkada, Navya Roth, Alexis Felsher, Marisa Sandling, Marcus Szep, Zsofia PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV infection has been slow. The purpose of this study was to evaluate knowledge, attitudes and referral practices for PrEP among non-prescribing providers, who may play key role. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey on PrEP knowledge, attitudes, and referral practices among 66 non-prescribing HIV prevention providers (1st August to 31st December, 2016), in Philadelphia, followed by qualitative interviews with 12 of them (5th April to 10th May, 2017). RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 36 years, with 62% females. Majority were HIV case managers and rapid testers. For half of the respondents, PrEP eligibility screening was part of rapid HIV testing at their organization, 40% never had PrEP training and only 27% indicated personally screening clients for eligibility. Qualitative data revealed that participants held positive attitudes about PrEP and perceived organizational support, but had concerns about potential negative impacts and barriers to routine HIV screening. CONCLUSION: Results highlight the importance of training non-prescribing HIV prevention providers about PrEP, addressing their concerns, and incorporating PrEP screening and referral into routine HIV testing. Public Library of Science 2019-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6779237/ /pubmed/31589632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223486 Text en © 2019 Kundu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kundu, Iman
Martinez-Donate, Ana
Karkada, Navya
Roth, Alexis
Felsher, Marisa
Sandling, Marcus
Szep, Zsofia
Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study
title Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study
title_full Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study
title_fullStr Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study
title_short Attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV rapid testers and case managers in Philadelphia: A mixed methods study
title_sort attitudes and referral practices for pre-exposure prophylaxis (prep) among hiv rapid testers and case managers in philadelphia: a mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6779237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31589632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223486
work_keys_str_mv AT kunduiman attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy
AT martinezdonateana attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy
AT karkadanavya attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy
AT rothalexis attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy
AT felshermarisa attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy
AT sandlingmarcus attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy
AT szepzsofia attitudesandreferralpracticesforpreexposureprophylaxisprepamonghivrapidtestersandcasemanagersinphiladelphiaamixedmethodsstudy