Cargando…
South African stakeholders’ knowledge of community-based rehabilitation
BACKGROUND: Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) is a complex concept and strategy that has been implemented in diverse ways globally and in South Africa. Internationally, some stakeholders have described CBR as confusing, and this may influence implementation. A southern African study reports that...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6779963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616621 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.484 |
_version_ | 1783457016056905728 |
---|---|
author | Rule, Sarah Roberts, Anton McLaren, Pamela Philpott, Susan |
author_facet | Rule, Sarah Roberts, Anton McLaren, Pamela Philpott, Susan |
author_sort | Rule, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) is a complex concept and strategy that has been implemented in diverse ways globally and in South Africa. Internationally, some stakeholders have described CBR as confusing, and this may influence implementation. A southern African study reports that there is insufficient evidence of the understanding of CBR in the region to influence training, policy and practice. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate South African stakeholders’ knowledge of CBR. METHOD: This article reports on an electronic survey that was part of a larger mixed methods study. Based on the sample of 86 respondents, descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data and thematic analysis for the qualitative data. RESULTS: The majority of respondents had had exposure to CBR, but almost a quarter had no knowledge of the CBR guidelines and matrix. The results revealed varying knowledge concerning the key concepts of CBR, its beneficiaries and its funders. Respondents identified persons with disabilities as having a central role in the implementation of CBR. Problems with the visibility of CBR programmes were noted, as well as misunderstandings by many therapists. CONCLUSION: The implementation of CBR, and its goal of ensuring the rights of persons with disabilities, is negatively affected by the confusion attached to the understanding of what CBR is. The misunderstandings about, and lack of visibility of, CBR in South Africa may hinder its growing implementation in the country in line with new government policies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6779963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | AOSIS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67799632019-10-15 South African stakeholders’ knowledge of community-based rehabilitation Rule, Sarah Roberts, Anton McLaren, Pamela Philpott, Susan Afr J Disabil Original Research BACKGROUND: Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) is a complex concept and strategy that has been implemented in diverse ways globally and in South Africa. Internationally, some stakeholders have described CBR as confusing, and this may influence implementation. A southern African study reports that there is insufficient evidence of the understanding of CBR in the region to influence training, policy and practice. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate South African stakeholders’ knowledge of CBR. METHOD: This article reports on an electronic survey that was part of a larger mixed methods study. Based on the sample of 86 respondents, descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data and thematic analysis for the qualitative data. RESULTS: The majority of respondents had had exposure to CBR, but almost a quarter had no knowledge of the CBR guidelines and matrix. The results revealed varying knowledge concerning the key concepts of CBR, its beneficiaries and its funders. Respondents identified persons with disabilities as having a central role in the implementation of CBR. Problems with the visibility of CBR programmes were noted, as well as misunderstandings by many therapists. CONCLUSION: The implementation of CBR, and its goal of ensuring the rights of persons with disabilities, is negatively affected by the confusion attached to the understanding of what CBR is. The misunderstandings about, and lack of visibility of, CBR in South Africa may hinder its growing implementation in the country in line with new government policies. AOSIS 2019-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6779963/ /pubmed/31616621 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.484 Text en © 2019. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rule, Sarah Roberts, Anton McLaren, Pamela Philpott, Susan South African stakeholders’ knowledge of community-based rehabilitation |
title | South African stakeholders’ knowledge of community-based rehabilitation |
title_full | South African stakeholders’ knowledge of community-based rehabilitation |
title_fullStr | South African stakeholders’ knowledge of community-based rehabilitation |
title_full_unstemmed | South African stakeholders’ knowledge of community-based rehabilitation |
title_short | South African stakeholders’ knowledge of community-based rehabilitation |
title_sort | south african stakeholders’ knowledge of community-based rehabilitation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6779963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616621 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.484 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rulesarah southafricanstakeholdersknowledgeofcommunitybasedrehabilitation AT robertsanton southafricanstakeholdersknowledgeofcommunitybasedrehabilitation AT mclarenpamela southafricanstakeholdersknowledgeofcommunitybasedrehabilitation AT philpottsusan southafricanstakeholdersknowledgeofcommunitybasedrehabilitation |