Cargando…

Physiotherapist’s musculoskeletal imaging profiling questionnaire: Development, validation and pilot testing

BACKGROUND: Many countries have started adopting musculoskeletal imaging as part of physiotherapy practice and their educational programmes are expected to bridge the gaps in training. OBJECTIVES: To develop an instrument that can be used to explore the level and nature of training, attitude, compet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onyeso, Ogochukwu K.K., Umunnah, Joseph O., Ibikunle, Peter O., Odole, Adesola C., Anyachukwu, Canice C., Ezema, Charles I., Nwankwo, Maduabuchukwu J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6779980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616801
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v75i1.1338
_version_ 1783457020399058944
author Onyeso, Ogochukwu K.K.
Umunnah, Joseph O.
Ibikunle, Peter O.
Odole, Adesola C.
Anyachukwu, Canice C.
Ezema, Charles I.
Nwankwo, Maduabuchukwu J.
author_facet Onyeso, Ogochukwu K.K.
Umunnah, Joseph O.
Ibikunle, Peter O.
Odole, Adesola C.
Anyachukwu, Canice C.
Ezema, Charles I.
Nwankwo, Maduabuchukwu J.
author_sort Onyeso, Ogochukwu K.K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many countries have started adopting musculoskeletal imaging as part of physiotherapy practice and their educational programmes are expected to bridge the gaps in training. OBJECTIVES: To develop an instrument that can be used to explore the level and nature of training, attitude, competence and utilisation of musculoskeletal imaging among physiotherapists. METHOD: An exploratory sequential mixed methods design was used. An in-depth international literature search was conducted, followed by a focus group discussion (FGD). The FGD informants were recruited through maximum variation sampling. The results of the FGD and the information from relevant literature were used to draft the physiotherapist’s musculoskeletal imaging profile questionnaire (PMIPQ). The PMIPQ was then subjected to face, content and criterion validity and pilot testing. The final version of the PMIPQ consists of six domains: (A) demographic details, (B) nature of training in musculoskeletal imaging, (C) level of training, (D) attitude towards musculoskeletal imaging, (E) utilisation and (F) competence. Data were analysed using means, standard deviation, Spearman’s correlation (ρ) and Cronbach’s alpha (α); SPSS 20 software (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: The results showed that the PMIPQ has good psychometric properties: validity and internal consistency. The test–retest reliability (p-value) across the domains was: C (0.973), D (0.979), E (0.842) and F (0.716). CONCLUSION: Physiotherapist’s musculoskeletal imaging profile questionnaire is a relevant instrument for assessing the musculoskeletal imaging profile of physiotherapists in Nigeria and in other countries with a similar scope of training and practice. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Musculoskeletal system imaging is a potentially useful adjunct to physiotherapists in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6779980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67799802019-10-15 Physiotherapist’s musculoskeletal imaging profiling questionnaire: Development, validation and pilot testing Onyeso, Ogochukwu K.K. Umunnah, Joseph O. Ibikunle, Peter O. Odole, Adesola C. Anyachukwu, Canice C. Ezema, Charles I. Nwankwo, Maduabuchukwu J. S Afr J Physiother Original Research BACKGROUND: Many countries have started adopting musculoskeletal imaging as part of physiotherapy practice and their educational programmes are expected to bridge the gaps in training. OBJECTIVES: To develop an instrument that can be used to explore the level and nature of training, attitude, competence and utilisation of musculoskeletal imaging among physiotherapists. METHOD: An exploratory sequential mixed methods design was used. An in-depth international literature search was conducted, followed by a focus group discussion (FGD). The FGD informants were recruited through maximum variation sampling. The results of the FGD and the information from relevant literature were used to draft the physiotherapist’s musculoskeletal imaging profile questionnaire (PMIPQ). The PMIPQ was then subjected to face, content and criterion validity and pilot testing. The final version of the PMIPQ consists of six domains: (A) demographic details, (B) nature of training in musculoskeletal imaging, (C) level of training, (D) attitude towards musculoskeletal imaging, (E) utilisation and (F) competence. Data were analysed using means, standard deviation, Spearman’s correlation (ρ) and Cronbach’s alpha (α); SPSS 20 software (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: The results showed that the PMIPQ has good psychometric properties: validity and internal consistency. The test–retest reliability (p-value) across the domains was: C (0.973), D (0.979), E (0.842) and F (0.716). CONCLUSION: Physiotherapist’s musculoskeletal imaging profile questionnaire is a relevant instrument for assessing the musculoskeletal imaging profile of physiotherapists in Nigeria and in other countries with a similar scope of training and practice. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Musculoskeletal system imaging is a potentially useful adjunct to physiotherapists in clinical practice. AOSIS 2019-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6779980/ /pubmed/31616801 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v75i1.1338 Text en © 2019. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Onyeso, Ogochukwu K.K.
Umunnah, Joseph O.
Ibikunle, Peter O.
Odole, Adesola C.
Anyachukwu, Canice C.
Ezema, Charles I.
Nwankwo, Maduabuchukwu J.
Physiotherapist’s musculoskeletal imaging profiling questionnaire: Development, validation and pilot testing
title Physiotherapist’s musculoskeletal imaging profiling questionnaire: Development, validation and pilot testing
title_full Physiotherapist’s musculoskeletal imaging profiling questionnaire: Development, validation and pilot testing
title_fullStr Physiotherapist’s musculoskeletal imaging profiling questionnaire: Development, validation and pilot testing
title_full_unstemmed Physiotherapist’s musculoskeletal imaging profiling questionnaire: Development, validation and pilot testing
title_short Physiotherapist’s musculoskeletal imaging profiling questionnaire: Development, validation and pilot testing
title_sort physiotherapist’s musculoskeletal imaging profiling questionnaire: development, validation and pilot testing
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6779980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616801
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v75i1.1338
work_keys_str_mv AT onyesoogochukwukk physiotherapistsmusculoskeletalimagingprofilingquestionnairedevelopmentvalidationandpilottesting
AT umunnahjosepho physiotherapistsmusculoskeletalimagingprofilingquestionnairedevelopmentvalidationandpilottesting
AT ibikunlepetero physiotherapistsmusculoskeletalimagingprofilingquestionnairedevelopmentvalidationandpilottesting
AT odoleadesolac physiotherapistsmusculoskeletalimagingprofilingquestionnairedevelopmentvalidationandpilottesting
AT anyachukwucanicec physiotherapistsmusculoskeletalimagingprofilingquestionnairedevelopmentvalidationandpilottesting
AT ezemacharlesi physiotherapistsmusculoskeletalimagingprofilingquestionnairedevelopmentvalidationandpilottesting
AT nwankwomaduabuchukwuj physiotherapistsmusculoskeletalimagingprofilingquestionnairedevelopmentvalidationandpilottesting