Cargando…

Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures

Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) based on the analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity. We gathered follow-up information for pregnancies in women with test-positive NIPS results from 2014–2017 with quarterly assessments of positive p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DiNonno, Wendy, Demko, Zachary, Martin, Kimberly, Billings, Paul, Egbert, Melissa, Zneimer, Susan, Keen-Kim, Dianne, Benn, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454954
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091311
_version_ 1783457094768263168
author DiNonno, Wendy
Demko, Zachary
Martin, Kimberly
Billings, Paul
Egbert, Melissa
Zneimer, Susan
Keen-Kim, Dianne
Benn, Peter
author_facet DiNonno, Wendy
Demko, Zachary
Martin, Kimberly
Billings, Paul
Egbert, Melissa
Zneimer, Susan
Keen-Kim, Dianne
Benn, Peter
author_sort DiNonno, Wendy
collection PubMed
description Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) based on the analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity. We gathered follow-up information for pregnancies in women with test-positive NIPS results from 2014–2017 with quarterly assessments of positive predictive values (PPVs). A non-inferiority analysis with a minimum requirement of 70%/80% of expected performance for trisomy 21 and 18 was used to ensure testing met expectations. PPVs were evaluated in the context of changes in the population receiving testing. For all quarters, PPVs for trisomies 21 and 18 exceeded the requirement of > 70% of the reference PPV. Overall observed PPVs for trisomy 21, 18, 13 and monosomy X were similar for women aged <35 (90.9%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 88.6–92.7%) compared to women with advanced maternal age (94.5%, 95% CI 93.1–95.6%). Despite significant declines in test-positive rates from 1.18% to 0.62% for trisomy 21, and from 0.75% to 0.48% for trisomies 18, 13 and monosomy X combined, PPVs remained stable through the four-year interval. We conclude that quarterly evaluation of PPV provides an overview of past testing and helps demonstrate long-term consistency in test performance, even in the setting of increasing use by women with lower a priori risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6780279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67802792019-10-30 Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures DiNonno, Wendy Demko, Zachary Martin, Kimberly Billings, Paul Egbert, Melissa Zneimer, Susan Keen-Kim, Dianne Benn, Peter J Clin Med Article Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) based on the analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity. We gathered follow-up information for pregnancies in women with test-positive NIPS results from 2014–2017 with quarterly assessments of positive predictive values (PPVs). A non-inferiority analysis with a minimum requirement of 70%/80% of expected performance for trisomy 21 and 18 was used to ensure testing met expectations. PPVs were evaluated in the context of changes in the population receiving testing. For all quarters, PPVs for trisomies 21 and 18 exceeded the requirement of > 70% of the reference PPV. Overall observed PPVs for trisomy 21, 18, 13 and monosomy X were similar for women aged <35 (90.9%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 88.6–92.7%) compared to women with advanced maternal age (94.5%, 95% CI 93.1–95.6%). Despite significant declines in test-positive rates from 1.18% to 0.62% for trisomy 21, and from 0.75% to 0.48% for trisomies 18, 13 and monosomy X combined, PPVs remained stable through the four-year interval. We conclude that quarterly evaluation of PPV provides an overview of past testing and helps demonstrate long-term consistency in test performance, even in the setting of increasing use by women with lower a priori risks. MDPI 2019-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6780279/ /pubmed/31454954 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091311 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
DiNonno, Wendy
Demko, Zachary
Martin, Kimberly
Billings, Paul
Egbert, Melissa
Zneimer, Susan
Keen-Kim, Dianne
Benn, Peter
Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures
title Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures
title_full Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures
title_fullStr Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures
title_full_unstemmed Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures
title_short Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures
title_sort quality assurance of non-invasive prenatal screening (nips) for fetal aneuploidy using positive predictive values as outcome measures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454954
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091311
work_keys_str_mv AT dinonnowendy qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures
AT demkozachary qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures
AT martinkimberly qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures
AT billingspaul qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures
AT egbertmelissa qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures
AT zneimersusan qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures
AT keenkimdianne qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures
AT bennpeter qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures