Cargando…
Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures
Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) based on the analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity. We gathered follow-up information for pregnancies in women with test-positive NIPS results from 2014–2017 with quarterly assessments of positive p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454954 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091311 |
_version_ | 1783457094768263168 |
---|---|
author | DiNonno, Wendy Demko, Zachary Martin, Kimberly Billings, Paul Egbert, Melissa Zneimer, Susan Keen-Kim, Dianne Benn, Peter |
author_facet | DiNonno, Wendy Demko, Zachary Martin, Kimberly Billings, Paul Egbert, Melissa Zneimer, Susan Keen-Kim, Dianne Benn, Peter |
author_sort | DiNonno, Wendy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) based on the analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity. We gathered follow-up information for pregnancies in women with test-positive NIPS results from 2014–2017 with quarterly assessments of positive predictive values (PPVs). A non-inferiority analysis with a minimum requirement of 70%/80% of expected performance for trisomy 21 and 18 was used to ensure testing met expectations. PPVs were evaluated in the context of changes in the population receiving testing. For all quarters, PPVs for trisomies 21 and 18 exceeded the requirement of > 70% of the reference PPV. Overall observed PPVs for trisomy 21, 18, 13 and monosomy X were similar for women aged <35 (90.9%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 88.6–92.7%) compared to women with advanced maternal age (94.5%, 95% CI 93.1–95.6%). Despite significant declines in test-positive rates from 1.18% to 0.62% for trisomy 21, and from 0.75% to 0.48% for trisomies 18, 13 and monosomy X combined, PPVs remained stable through the four-year interval. We conclude that quarterly evaluation of PPV provides an overview of past testing and helps demonstrate long-term consistency in test performance, even in the setting of increasing use by women with lower a priori risks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6780279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67802792019-10-30 Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures DiNonno, Wendy Demko, Zachary Martin, Kimberly Billings, Paul Egbert, Melissa Zneimer, Susan Keen-Kim, Dianne Benn, Peter J Clin Med Article Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) based on the analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity. We gathered follow-up information for pregnancies in women with test-positive NIPS results from 2014–2017 with quarterly assessments of positive predictive values (PPVs). A non-inferiority analysis with a minimum requirement of 70%/80% of expected performance for trisomy 21 and 18 was used to ensure testing met expectations. PPVs were evaluated in the context of changes in the population receiving testing. For all quarters, PPVs for trisomies 21 and 18 exceeded the requirement of > 70% of the reference PPV. Overall observed PPVs for trisomy 21, 18, 13 and monosomy X were similar for women aged <35 (90.9%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 88.6–92.7%) compared to women with advanced maternal age (94.5%, 95% CI 93.1–95.6%). Despite significant declines in test-positive rates from 1.18% to 0.62% for trisomy 21, and from 0.75% to 0.48% for trisomies 18, 13 and monosomy X combined, PPVs remained stable through the four-year interval. We conclude that quarterly evaluation of PPV provides an overview of past testing and helps demonstrate long-term consistency in test performance, even in the setting of increasing use by women with lower a priori risks. MDPI 2019-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6780279/ /pubmed/31454954 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091311 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article DiNonno, Wendy Demko, Zachary Martin, Kimberly Billings, Paul Egbert, Melissa Zneimer, Susan Keen-Kim, Dianne Benn, Peter Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures |
title | Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures |
title_full | Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures |
title_fullStr | Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures |
title_short | Quality Assurance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) for Fetal Aneuploidy Using Positive Predictive Values as Outcome Measures |
title_sort | quality assurance of non-invasive prenatal screening (nips) for fetal aneuploidy using positive predictive values as outcome measures |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454954 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091311 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dinonnowendy qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures AT demkozachary qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures AT martinkimberly qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures AT billingspaul qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures AT egbertmelissa qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures AT zneimersusan qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures AT keenkimdianne qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures AT bennpeter qualityassuranceofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningnipsforfetalaneuploidyusingpositivepredictivevaluesasoutcomemeasures |