Cargando…

A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors

Aim: This prospective study assessed the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using long Kupffer phase enhancement for adults with liver tumor size of less than 3 cm. Performance comparisons were also conducted with dynamic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsiao, Chih-Yang, Chen, Po-Da, Huang, Kai-Wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31480576
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091353
_version_ 1783457184558874624
author Hsiao, Chih-Yang
Chen, Po-Da
Huang, Kai-Wen
author_facet Hsiao, Chih-Yang
Chen, Po-Da
Huang, Kai-Wen
author_sort Hsiao, Chih-Yang
collection PubMed
description Aim: This prospective study assessed the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using long Kupffer phase enhancement for adults with liver tumor size of less than 3 cm. Performance comparisons were also conducted with dynamic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Background: CEUS has emerged as a reliable image modality, since the development of second-generation contrast medium with long Kupffer phase enhancement. Nonetheless, dynamic CT and MRI are currently the standard imaging tools for the diagnosis of liver cancers, and the diagnostic value of CEUS for liver cancer has yet to be universally accepted. Methods: Sixty-six adult patients suspected of having liver tumors smaller than 3 cm underwent CEUS, dynamic CT, and MRI examinations independently. Subsequent tumor biopsies were used to verify the diagnostic performance of the three imaging modalities. Results: The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR, 95% CI) for hepatocellular carcinoma were as follows: CEUS (52.8, 11.4–243), MRI (29.29, 7.36–116), and CT (19.43, 5.44–69.4); for metastasis: CEUS (200, 19.1–2095), MRI (24, 5.05–114), and CT (32, 6.56–156); and all liver malignancy: CEUS (260, 12.7–5310), MRI (2.57, 0.55–12.1), and CT (5.22, 1.25–21.8). CEUS achieved the best differentiation performance. Conclusions: CEUS outperformed dynamic CT and MRI in terms of diagnostic performance when dealing with small liver tumors (<3 cm).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6780634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67806342019-10-30 A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors Hsiao, Chih-Yang Chen, Po-Da Huang, Kai-Wen J Clin Med Article Aim: This prospective study assessed the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using long Kupffer phase enhancement for adults with liver tumor size of less than 3 cm. Performance comparisons were also conducted with dynamic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Background: CEUS has emerged as a reliable image modality, since the development of second-generation contrast medium with long Kupffer phase enhancement. Nonetheless, dynamic CT and MRI are currently the standard imaging tools for the diagnosis of liver cancers, and the diagnostic value of CEUS for liver cancer has yet to be universally accepted. Methods: Sixty-six adult patients suspected of having liver tumors smaller than 3 cm underwent CEUS, dynamic CT, and MRI examinations independently. Subsequent tumor biopsies were used to verify the diagnostic performance of the three imaging modalities. Results: The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR, 95% CI) for hepatocellular carcinoma were as follows: CEUS (52.8, 11.4–243), MRI (29.29, 7.36–116), and CT (19.43, 5.44–69.4); for metastasis: CEUS (200, 19.1–2095), MRI (24, 5.05–114), and CT (32, 6.56–156); and all liver malignancy: CEUS (260, 12.7–5310), MRI (2.57, 0.55–12.1), and CT (5.22, 1.25–21.8). CEUS achieved the best differentiation performance. Conclusions: CEUS outperformed dynamic CT and MRI in terms of diagnostic performance when dealing with small liver tumors (<3 cm). MDPI 2019-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6780634/ /pubmed/31480576 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091353 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hsiao, Chih-Yang
Chen, Po-Da
Huang, Kai-Wen
A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors
title A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors
title_full A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors
title_fullStr A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors
title_short A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors
title_sort prospective assessment of the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, dynamic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for patients with small liver tumors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31480576
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091353
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiaochihyang aprospectiveassessmentofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasounddynamiccomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforpatientswithsmalllivertumors
AT chenpoda aprospectiveassessmentofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasounddynamiccomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforpatientswithsmalllivertumors
AT huangkaiwen aprospectiveassessmentofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasounddynamiccomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforpatientswithsmalllivertumors
AT hsiaochihyang prospectiveassessmentofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasounddynamiccomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforpatientswithsmalllivertumors
AT chenpoda prospectiveassessmentofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasounddynamiccomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforpatientswithsmalllivertumors
AT huangkaiwen prospectiveassessmentofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasounddynamiccomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforpatientswithsmalllivertumors