Cargando…
A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors
Aim: This prospective study assessed the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using long Kupffer phase enhancement for adults with liver tumor size of less than 3 cm. Performance comparisons were also conducted with dynamic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31480576 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091353 |
_version_ | 1783457184558874624 |
---|---|
author | Hsiao, Chih-Yang Chen, Po-Da Huang, Kai-Wen |
author_facet | Hsiao, Chih-Yang Chen, Po-Da Huang, Kai-Wen |
author_sort | Hsiao, Chih-Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: This prospective study assessed the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using long Kupffer phase enhancement for adults with liver tumor size of less than 3 cm. Performance comparisons were also conducted with dynamic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Background: CEUS has emerged as a reliable image modality, since the development of second-generation contrast medium with long Kupffer phase enhancement. Nonetheless, dynamic CT and MRI are currently the standard imaging tools for the diagnosis of liver cancers, and the diagnostic value of CEUS for liver cancer has yet to be universally accepted. Methods: Sixty-six adult patients suspected of having liver tumors smaller than 3 cm underwent CEUS, dynamic CT, and MRI examinations independently. Subsequent tumor biopsies were used to verify the diagnostic performance of the three imaging modalities. Results: The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR, 95% CI) for hepatocellular carcinoma were as follows: CEUS (52.8, 11.4–243), MRI (29.29, 7.36–116), and CT (19.43, 5.44–69.4); for metastasis: CEUS (200, 19.1–2095), MRI (24, 5.05–114), and CT (32, 6.56–156); and all liver malignancy: CEUS (260, 12.7–5310), MRI (2.57, 0.55–12.1), and CT (5.22, 1.25–21.8). CEUS achieved the best differentiation performance. Conclusions: CEUS outperformed dynamic CT and MRI in terms of diagnostic performance when dealing with small liver tumors (<3 cm). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6780634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67806342019-10-30 A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors Hsiao, Chih-Yang Chen, Po-Da Huang, Kai-Wen J Clin Med Article Aim: This prospective study assessed the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using long Kupffer phase enhancement for adults with liver tumor size of less than 3 cm. Performance comparisons were also conducted with dynamic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Background: CEUS has emerged as a reliable image modality, since the development of second-generation contrast medium with long Kupffer phase enhancement. Nonetheless, dynamic CT and MRI are currently the standard imaging tools for the diagnosis of liver cancers, and the diagnostic value of CEUS for liver cancer has yet to be universally accepted. Methods: Sixty-six adult patients suspected of having liver tumors smaller than 3 cm underwent CEUS, dynamic CT, and MRI examinations independently. Subsequent tumor biopsies were used to verify the diagnostic performance of the three imaging modalities. Results: The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR, 95% CI) for hepatocellular carcinoma were as follows: CEUS (52.8, 11.4–243), MRI (29.29, 7.36–116), and CT (19.43, 5.44–69.4); for metastasis: CEUS (200, 19.1–2095), MRI (24, 5.05–114), and CT (32, 6.56–156); and all liver malignancy: CEUS (260, 12.7–5310), MRI (2.57, 0.55–12.1), and CT (5.22, 1.25–21.8). CEUS achieved the best differentiation performance. Conclusions: CEUS outperformed dynamic CT and MRI in terms of diagnostic performance when dealing with small liver tumors (<3 cm). MDPI 2019-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6780634/ /pubmed/31480576 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091353 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hsiao, Chih-Yang Chen, Po-Da Huang, Kai-Wen A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors |
title | A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors |
title_full | A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors |
title_fullStr | A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors |
title_short | A Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Dynamic Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with Small Liver Tumors |
title_sort | prospective assessment of the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, dynamic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for patients with small liver tumors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31480576 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hsiaochihyang aprospectiveassessmentofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasounddynamiccomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforpatientswithsmalllivertumors AT chenpoda aprospectiveassessmentofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasounddynamiccomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforpatientswithsmalllivertumors AT huangkaiwen aprospectiveassessmentofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasounddynamiccomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforpatientswithsmalllivertumors AT hsiaochihyang prospectiveassessmentofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasounddynamiccomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforpatientswithsmalllivertumors AT chenpoda prospectiveassessmentofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasounddynamiccomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforpatientswithsmalllivertumors AT huangkaiwen prospectiveassessmentofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasounddynamiccomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforpatientswithsmalllivertumors |