Cargando…

The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces

Purpose: Bacterial biofilms are a major problem in the treatment of infected dental and orthopedic implants. The purpose of this study is to investigate the cleaning effect of an electrolytic approach (EC) compared to a powder-spray system (PSS) on titanium surfaces. Materials and Methods: The teste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ratka, Christoph, Weigl, Paul, Henrich, Dirk, Koch, Felix, Schlee, Markus, Zipprich, Holger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091397
_version_ 1783457185519370240
author Ratka, Christoph
Weigl, Paul
Henrich, Dirk
Koch, Felix
Schlee, Markus
Zipprich, Holger
author_facet Ratka, Christoph
Weigl, Paul
Henrich, Dirk
Koch, Felix
Schlee, Markus
Zipprich, Holger
author_sort Ratka, Christoph
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Bacterial biofilms are a major problem in the treatment of infected dental and orthopedic implants. The purpose of this study is to investigate the cleaning effect of an electrolytic approach (EC) compared to a powder-spray system (PSS) on titanium surfaces. Materials and Methods: The tested implants (different surfaces and alloys) were collated into six groups and treated ether with EC or PSS. After a mature biofilm was established, the implants were treated, immersed in a nutritional solution, and streaked on Columbia agar. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were counted after breeding and testing (EC), and control (PSS) groups were compared using a paired sample t-test. Results: No bacterial growth was observed in the EC groups. After thinning to 1:1,000,000, 258.1 ± 19.9 (group 2), 264.4 ± 36.5 (group 4), and 245.3 ± 40.7 (group 6) CFUs could be counted in the PSS groups. The difference between the electrolytic approach (test groups 1, 3, and 5) and PSS (control groups 2, 4, and 6) was statistically extremely significant (p-value < 2.2 × 10(−16)). Conclusion: Only EC inactivated the bacterial biofilm, and PSS left reproducible bacteria behind. Within the limits of this in vitro test, clinical relevance could be demonstrated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6780638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67806382019-10-30 The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces Ratka, Christoph Weigl, Paul Henrich, Dirk Koch, Felix Schlee, Markus Zipprich, Holger J Clin Med Article Purpose: Bacterial biofilms are a major problem in the treatment of infected dental and orthopedic implants. The purpose of this study is to investigate the cleaning effect of an electrolytic approach (EC) compared to a powder-spray system (PSS) on titanium surfaces. Materials and Methods: The tested implants (different surfaces and alloys) were collated into six groups and treated ether with EC or PSS. After a mature biofilm was established, the implants were treated, immersed in a nutritional solution, and streaked on Columbia agar. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were counted after breeding and testing (EC), and control (PSS) groups were compared using a paired sample t-test. Results: No bacterial growth was observed in the EC groups. After thinning to 1:1,000,000, 258.1 ± 19.9 (group 2), 264.4 ± 36.5 (group 4), and 245.3 ± 40.7 (group 6) CFUs could be counted in the PSS groups. The difference between the electrolytic approach (test groups 1, 3, and 5) and PSS (control groups 2, 4, and 6) was statistically extremely significant (p-value < 2.2 × 10(−16)). Conclusion: Only EC inactivated the bacterial biofilm, and PSS left reproducible bacteria behind. Within the limits of this in vitro test, clinical relevance could be demonstrated. MDPI 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6780638/ /pubmed/31500093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091397 Text en © 2019 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Ratka, Christoph
Weigl, Paul
Henrich, Dirk
Koch, Felix
Schlee, Markus
Zipprich, Holger
The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces
title The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces
title_full The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces
title_fullStr The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces
title_short The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces
title_sort effect of in vitro electrolytic cleaning on biofilm-contaminated implant surfaces
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091397
work_keys_str_mv AT ratkachristoph theeffectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces
AT weiglpaul theeffectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces
AT henrichdirk theeffectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces
AT kochfelix theeffectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces
AT schleemarkus theeffectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces
AT zipprichholger theeffectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces
AT ratkachristoph effectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces
AT weiglpaul effectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces
AT henrichdirk effectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces
AT kochfelix effectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces
AT schleemarkus effectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces
AT zipprichholger effectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces