Cargando…
The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces
Purpose: Bacterial biofilms are a major problem in the treatment of infected dental and orthopedic implants. The purpose of this study is to investigate the cleaning effect of an electrolytic approach (EC) compared to a powder-spray system (PSS) on titanium surfaces. Materials and Methods: The teste...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091397 |
_version_ | 1783457185519370240 |
---|---|
author | Ratka, Christoph Weigl, Paul Henrich, Dirk Koch, Felix Schlee, Markus Zipprich, Holger |
author_facet | Ratka, Christoph Weigl, Paul Henrich, Dirk Koch, Felix Schlee, Markus Zipprich, Holger |
author_sort | Ratka, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Bacterial biofilms are a major problem in the treatment of infected dental and orthopedic implants. The purpose of this study is to investigate the cleaning effect of an electrolytic approach (EC) compared to a powder-spray system (PSS) on titanium surfaces. Materials and Methods: The tested implants (different surfaces and alloys) were collated into six groups and treated ether with EC or PSS. After a mature biofilm was established, the implants were treated, immersed in a nutritional solution, and streaked on Columbia agar. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were counted after breeding and testing (EC), and control (PSS) groups were compared using a paired sample t-test. Results: No bacterial growth was observed in the EC groups. After thinning to 1:1,000,000, 258.1 ± 19.9 (group 2), 264.4 ± 36.5 (group 4), and 245.3 ± 40.7 (group 6) CFUs could be counted in the PSS groups. The difference between the electrolytic approach (test groups 1, 3, and 5) and PSS (control groups 2, 4, and 6) was statistically extremely significant (p-value < 2.2 × 10(−16)). Conclusion: Only EC inactivated the bacterial biofilm, and PSS left reproducible bacteria behind. Within the limits of this in vitro test, clinical relevance could be demonstrated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6780638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67806382019-10-30 The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces Ratka, Christoph Weigl, Paul Henrich, Dirk Koch, Felix Schlee, Markus Zipprich, Holger J Clin Med Article Purpose: Bacterial biofilms are a major problem in the treatment of infected dental and orthopedic implants. The purpose of this study is to investigate the cleaning effect of an electrolytic approach (EC) compared to a powder-spray system (PSS) on titanium surfaces. Materials and Methods: The tested implants (different surfaces and alloys) were collated into six groups and treated ether with EC or PSS. After a mature biofilm was established, the implants were treated, immersed in a nutritional solution, and streaked on Columbia agar. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were counted after breeding and testing (EC), and control (PSS) groups were compared using a paired sample t-test. Results: No bacterial growth was observed in the EC groups. After thinning to 1:1,000,000, 258.1 ± 19.9 (group 2), 264.4 ± 36.5 (group 4), and 245.3 ± 40.7 (group 6) CFUs could be counted in the PSS groups. The difference between the electrolytic approach (test groups 1, 3, and 5) and PSS (control groups 2, 4, and 6) was statistically extremely significant (p-value < 2.2 × 10(−16)). Conclusion: Only EC inactivated the bacterial biofilm, and PSS left reproducible bacteria behind. Within the limits of this in vitro test, clinical relevance could be demonstrated. MDPI 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6780638/ /pubmed/31500093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091397 Text en © 2019 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Ratka, Christoph Weigl, Paul Henrich, Dirk Koch, Felix Schlee, Markus Zipprich, Holger The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces |
title | The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces |
title_full | The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces |
title_fullStr | The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces |
title_short | The Effect of In Vitro Electrolytic Cleaning on Biofilm-Contaminated Implant Surfaces |
title_sort | effect of in vitro electrolytic cleaning on biofilm-contaminated implant surfaces |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091397 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ratkachristoph theeffectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces AT weiglpaul theeffectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces AT henrichdirk theeffectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces AT kochfelix theeffectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces AT schleemarkus theeffectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces AT zipprichholger theeffectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces AT ratkachristoph effectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces AT weiglpaul effectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces AT henrichdirk effectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces AT kochfelix effectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces AT schleemarkus effectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces AT zipprichholger effectofinvitroelectrolyticcleaningonbiofilmcontaminatedimplantsurfaces |