Cargando…

Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited

Aim: To assess whether the detection rate of optic disc drusen (ODD) in children with swollen optic discs varies if the ultrasound scan (USS) is performed through the lens or avoiding the lens. Methods: Retrospective review of the ultrasound machine database for all patients who underwent USS for sw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajagopal, Renuka, Mitchell, Ellen, Sylvester, Christin, Lope, Lea Ann, Nischal, Ken Kanwal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31547278
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091449
_version_ 1783457241726189568
author Rajagopal, Renuka
Mitchell, Ellen
Sylvester, Christin
Lope, Lea Ann
Nischal, Ken Kanwal
author_facet Rajagopal, Renuka
Mitchell, Ellen
Sylvester, Christin
Lope, Lea Ann
Nischal, Ken Kanwal
author_sort Rajagopal, Renuka
collection PubMed
description Aim: To assess whether the detection rate of optic disc drusen (ODD) in children with swollen optic discs varies if the ultrasound scan (USS) is performed through the lens or avoiding the lens. Methods: Retrospective review of the ultrasound machine database for all patients who underwent USS for swollen discs in the department of pediatric ophthalmology, UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh. Only patients who had both fundus pictures and USS performed (through and avoiding the lens) were included in the study. Results: A total of 31 patients (62 eyes) were included in the study. USS detected ODD in 44% of eyes (27 of 62 eyes, 15 patients). In 82% of these eyes (22 of 27 eyes), the ODD were not detected initially when scanning was done through the lens but were only detected when scanning was performed avoiding the lens. Ten out of sixteen patients with no ODD on USS had another identifiable cause for disc elevation, including raised intracranial pressure and sleep apnea. Conclusion: Ultrasound is a sensitive diagnostic tool for detecting ODD. The rate of detection of ODD is increased when USS is done avoiding the lens in children where the ODD are usually buried and not as calcified as those found in adults. Under such circumstances, the reduced echogenicity is absorbed by the absorbent pediatric lens, thus limiting the detection rates when scanning through the lens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6780868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67808682019-10-30 Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited Rajagopal, Renuka Mitchell, Ellen Sylvester, Christin Lope, Lea Ann Nischal, Ken Kanwal J Clin Med Article Aim: To assess whether the detection rate of optic disc drusen (ODD) in children with swollen optic discs varies if the ultrasound scan (USS) is performed through the lens or avoiding the lens. Methods: Retrospective review of the ultrasound machine database for all patients who underwent USS for swollen discs in the department of pediatric ophthalmology, UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh. Only patients who had both fundus pictures and USS performed (through and avoiding the lens) were included in the study. Results: A total of 31 patients (62 eyes) were included in the study. USS detected ODD in 44% of eyes (27 of 62 eyes, 15 patients). In 82% of these eyes (22 of 27 eyes), the ODD were not detected initially when scanning was done through the lens but were only detected when scanning was performed avoiding the lens. Ten out of sixteen patients with no ODD on USS had another identifiable cause for disc elevation, including raised intracranial pressure and sleep apnea. Conclusion: Ultrasound is a sensitive diagnostic tool for detecting ODD. The rate of detection of ODD is increased when USS is done avoiding the lens in children where the ODD are usually buried and not as calcified as those found in adults. Under such circumstances, the reduced echogenicity is absorbed by the absorbent pediatric lens, thus limiting the detection rates when scanning through the lens. MDPI 2019-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6780868/ /pubmed/31547278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091449 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rajagopal, Renuka
Mitchell, Ellen
Sylvester, Christin
Lope, Lea Ann
Nischal, Ken Kanwal
Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited
title Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited
title_full Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited
title_fullStr Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited
title_short Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited
title_sort detection of optic disc drusen in children using ultrasound through the lens and avoiding the lens—point of care ultrasound technique of evaluation revisited
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31547278
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091449
work_keys_str_mv AT rajagopalrenuka detectionofopticdiscdruseninchildrenusingultrasoundthroughthelensandavoidingthelenspointofcareultrasoundtechniqueofevaluationrevisited
AT mitchellellen detectionofopticdiscdruseninchildrenusingultrasoundthroughthelensandavoidingthelenspointofcareultrasoundtechniqueofevaluationrevisited
AT sylvesterchristin detectionofopticdiscdruseninchildrenusingultrasoundthroughthelensandavoidingthelenspointofcareultrasoundtechniqueofevaluationrevisited
AT lopeleaann detectionofopticdiscdruseninchildrenusingultrasoundthroughthelensandavoidingthelenspointofcareultrasoundtechniqueofevaluationrevisited
AT nischalkenkanwal detectionofopticdiscdruseninchildrenusingultrasoundthroughthelensandavoidingthelenspointofcareultrasoundtechniqueofevaluationrevisited