Cargando…
Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited
Aim: To assess whether the detection rate of optic disc drusen (ODD) in children with swollen optic discs varies if the ultrasound scan (USS) is performed through the lens or avoiding the lens. Methods: Retrospective review of the ultrasound machine database for all patients who underwent USS for sw...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31547278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091449 |
_version_ | 1783457241726189568 |
---|---|
author | Rajagopal, Renuka Mitchell, Ellen Sylvester, Christin Lope, Lea Ann Nischal, Ken Kanwal |
author_facet | Rajagopal, Renuka Mitchell, Ellen Sylvester, Christin Lope, Lea Ann Nischal, Ken Kanwal |
author_sort | Rajagopal, Renuka |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: To assess whether the detection rate of optic disc drusen (ODD) in children with swollen optic discs varies if the ultrasound scan (USS) is performed through the lens or avoiding the lens. Methods: Retrospective review of the ultrasound machine database for all patients who underwent USS for swollen discs in the department of pediatric ophthalmology, UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh. Only patients who had both fundus pictures and USS performed (through and avoiding the lens) were included in the study. Results: A total of 31 patients (62 eyes) were included in the study. USS detected ODD in 44% of eyes (27 of 62 eyes, 15 patients). In 82% of these eyes (22 of 27 eyes), the ODD were not detected initially when scanning was done through the lens but were only detected when scanning was performed avoiding the lens. Ten out of sixteen patients with no ODD on USS had another identifiable cause for disc elevation, including raised intracranial pressure and sleep apnea. Conclusion: Ultrasound is a sensitive diagnostic tool for detecting ODD. The rate of detection of ODD is increased when USS is done avoiding the lens in children where the ODD are usually buried and not as calcified as those found in adults. Under such circumstances, the reduced echogenicity is absorbed by the absorbent pediatric lens, thus limiting the detection rates when scanning through the lens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6780868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67808682019-10-30 Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited Rajagopal, Renuka Mitchell, Ellen Sylvester, Christin Lope, Lea Ann Nischal, Ken Kanwal J Clin Med Article Aim: To assess whether the detection rate of optic disc drusen (ODD) in children with swollen optic discs varies if the ultrasound scan (USS) is performed through the lens or avoiding the lens. Methods: Retrospective review of the ultrasound machine database for all patients who underwent USS for swollen discs in the department of pediatric ophthalmology, UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh. Only patients who had both fundus pictures and USS performed (through and avoiding the lens) were included in the study. Results: A total of 31 patients (62 eyes) were included in the study. USS detected ODD in 44% of eyes (27 of 62 eyes, 15 patients). In 82% of these eyes (22 of 27 eyes), the ODD were not detected initially when scanning was done through the lens but were only detected when scanning was performed avoiding the lens. Ten out of sixteen patients with no ODD on USS had another identifiable cause for disc elevation, including raised intracranial pressure and sleep apnea. Conclusion: Ultrasound is a sensitive diagnostic tool for detecting ODD. The rate of detection of ODD is increased when USS is done avoiding the lens in children where the ODD are usually buried and not as calcified as those found in adults. Under such circumstances, the reduced echogenicity is absorbed by the absorbent pediatric lens, thus limiting the detection rates when scanning through the lens. MDPI 2019-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6780868/ /pubmed/31547278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091449 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rajagopal, Renuka Mitchell, Ellen Sylvester, Christin Lope, Lea Ann Nischal, Ken Kanwal Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited |
title | Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited |
title_full | Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited |
title_fullStr | Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited |
title_short | Detection of Optic Disc Drusen in Children Using Ultrasound through the Lens and Avoiding the Lens—Point of Care Ultrasound Technique of Evaluation Revisited |
title_sort | detection of optic disc drusen in children using ultrasound through the lens and avoiding the lens—point of care ultrasound technique of evaluation revisited |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6780868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31547278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajagopalrenuka detectionofopticdiscdruseninchildrenusingultrasoundthroughthelensandavoidingthelenspointofcareultrasoundtechniqueofevaluationrevisited AT mitchellellen detectionofopticdiscdruseninchildrenusingultrasoundthroughthelensandavoidingthelenspointofcareultrasoundtechniqueofevaluationrevisited AT sylvesterchristin detectionofopticdiscdruseninchildrenusingultrasoundthroughthelensandavoidingthelenspointofcareultrasoundtechniqueofevaluationrevisited AT lopeleaann detectionofopticdiscdruseninchildrenusingultrasoundthroughthelensandavoidingthelenspointofcareultrasoundtechniqueofevaluationrevisited AT nischalkenkanwal detectionofopticdiscdruseninchildrenusingultrasoundthroughthelensandavoidingthelenspointofcareultrasoundtechniqueofevaluationrevisited |