Cargando…

Genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in Douglas-fir

Here, we perform cross-generational GS analysis on coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), reflecting trans-generational selective breeding application. A total of 1321 trees, representing 37 full-sib F(1) families from 3 environments in British Columbia, Canada, were used as the training popul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thistlethwaite, Frances R., Ratcliffe, Blaise, Klápště, Jaroslav, Porth, Ilga, Chen, Charles, Stoehr, Michael U., El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30631145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41437-018-0172-0
_version_ 1783457304440471552
author Thistlethwaite, Frances R.
Ratcliffe, Blaise
Klápště, Jaroslav
Porth, Ilga
Chen, Charles
Stoehr, Michael U.
El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
author_facet Thistlethwaite, Frances R.
Ratcliffe, Blaise
Klápště, Jaroslav
Porth, Ilga
Chen, Charles
Stoehr, Michael U.
El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
author_sort Thistlethwaite, Frances R.
collection PubMed
description Here, we perform cross-generational GS analysis on coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), reflecting trans-generational selective breeding application. A total of 1321 trees, representing 37 full-sib F(1) families from 3 environments in British Columbia, Canada, were used as the training population for (1) EBVs (estimated breeding values) of juvenile height (HTJ) in the F(1) generation predicting genomic EBVs of HTJ of 136 individuals in the F(2) generation, (2) deregressed EBVs of F(1) HTJ predicting deregressed genomic EBVs of F(2) HTJ, (3) F(1) mature height (HT35) predicting HTJ EBVs in F(2), and (4) deregressed F(1) HT35 predicting genomic deregressed HTJ EBVs in F(2). Ridge regression best linear unbiased predictor (RR-BLUP), generalized ridge regression (GRR), and Bayes-B GS methods were used and compared to pedigree-based (ABLUP) predictions. GS accuracies for scenarios 1 (0.92, 0.91, and 0.91) and 3 (0.57, 0.56, and 0.58) were similar to their ABLUP counterparts (0.92 and 0.60, respectively) (using RR-BLUP, GRR, and Bayes-B). Results using deregressed values fell dramatically for both scenarios 2 and 4 which approached zero in many cases. Cross-generational GS validation of juvenile height in Douglas-fir produced predictive accuracies almost as high as that of ABLUP. Without capturing LD, GS cannot surpass the prediction of ABLUP. Here we tracked pedigree relatedness between training and validation sets. More markers or improved distribution of markers are required to capture LD in Douglas-fir. This is essential for accurate forward selection among siblings as markers that track pedigree are of little use for forward selection of individuals within controlled pollinated families.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6781123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67811232019-10-09 Genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in Douglas-fir Thistlethwaite, Frances R. Ratcliffe, Blaise Klápště, Jaroslav Porth, Ilga Chen, Charles Stoehr, Michael U. El-Kassaby, Yousry A. Heredity (Edinb) Article Here, we perform cross-generational GS analysis on coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), reflecting trans-generational selective breeding application. A total of 1321 trees, representing 37 full-sib F(1) families from 3 environments in British Columbia, Canada, were used as the training population for (1) EBVs (estimated breeding values) of juvenile height (HTJ) in the F(1) generation predicting genomic EBVs of HTJ of 136 individuals in the F(2) generation, (2) deregressed EBVs of F(1) HTJ predicting deregressed genomic EBVs of F(2) HTJ, (3) F(1) mature height (HT35) predicting HTJ EBVs in F(2), and (4) deregressed F(1) HT35 predicting genomic deregressed HTJ EBVs in F(2). Ridge regression best linear unbiased predictor (RR-BLUP), generalized ridge regression (GRR), and Bayes-B GS methods were used and compared to pedigree-based (ABLUP) predictions. GS accuracies for scenarios 1 (0.92, 0.91, and 0.91) and 3 (0.57, 0.56, and 0.58) were similar to their ABLUP counterparts (0.92 and 0.60, respectively) (using RR-BLUP, GRR, and Bayes-B). Results using deregressed values fell dramatically for both scenarios 2 and 4 which approached zero in many cases. Cross-generational GS validation of juvenile height in Douglas-fir produced predictive accuracies almost as high as that of ABLUP. Without capturing LD, GS cannot surpass the prediction of ABLUP. Here we tracked pedigree relatedness between training and validation sets. More markers or improved distribution of markers are required to capture LD in Douglas-fir. This is essential for accurate forward selection among siblings as markers that track pedigree are of little use for forward selection of individuals within controlled pollinated families. Springer International Publishing 2019-01-10 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6781123/ /pubmed/30631145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41437-018-0172-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Thistlethwaite, Frances R.
Ratcliffe, Blaise
Klápště, Jaroslav
Porth, Ilga
Chen, Charles
Stoehr, Michael U.
El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
Genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in Douglas-fir
title Genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in Douglas-fir
title_full Genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in Douglas-fir
title_fullStr Genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in Douglas-fir
title_full_unstemmed Genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in Douglas-fir
title_short Genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in Douglas-fir
title_sort genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in douglas-fir
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30631145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41437-018-0172-0
work_keys_str_mv AT thistlethwaitefrancesr genomicselectionofjuvenileheightacrossasinglegenerationalgapindouglasfir
AT ratcliffeblaise genomicselectionofjuvenileheightacrossasinglegenerationalgapindouglasfir
AT klapstejaroslav genomicselectionofjuvenileheightacrossasinglegenerationalgapindouglasfir
AT porthilga genomicselectionofjuvenileheightacrossasinglegenerationalgapindouglasfir
AT chencharles genomicselectionofjuvenileheightacrossasinglegenerationalgapindouglasfir
AT stoehrmichaelu genomicselectionofjuvenileheightacrossasinglegenerationalgapindouglasfir
AT elkassabyyousrya genomicselectionofjuvenileheightacrossasinglegenerationalgapindouglasfir