Cargando…

‘We’re here to listen and help them as well’: a qualitative study of staff and Indigenous patient perceptions about participating in social and emotional wellbeing research at primary healthcare services

BACKGROUND: Research can inform culturally-appropriate care to strengthen social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB) among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter, the term ‘Indigenous Peoples’ is respectfully used and refers to all Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farnbach, Sara, Gee, Graham, Eades, Anne-Marie, Evans, John Robert, Fernando, Jamie, Hammond, Belinda, Simms, Matty, DeMasi, Karrina, Hackett, Maree L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31590642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2263-8
_version_ 1783457338540163072
author Farnbach, Sara
Gee, Graham
Eades, Anne-Marie
Evans, John Robert
Fernando, Jamie
Hammond, Belinda
Simms, Matty
DeMasi, Karrina
Hackett, Maree L.
author_facet Farnbach, Sara
Gee, Graham
Eades, Anne-Marie
Evans, John Robert
Fernando, Jamie
Hammond, Belinda
Simms, Matty
DeMasi, Karrina
Hackett, Maree L.
author_sort Farnbach, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research can inform culturally-appropriate care to strengthen social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB) among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter, the term ‘Indigenous Peoples’ is respectfully used and refers to all Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia). We acknowledge the cultural diversity of Australia’s Indigenous First Peoples and they do not represent a homogenous group.) (hereafter Indigenous) Peoples. We explore the perspectives of primary healthcare staff and Indigenous patients about their willingness to and experiences participating in SEWB research. METHOD: Process evaluation using grounded theory approaches of Getting it Right: The validation study, a national validation designed Indigenous SEWB research project (N = 500). Primary healthcare staff (n = 36) and community members (n = 4) from nine of ten primary healthcare services involved with the research project completed qualitative semi-structured interviews. Interview data were triangulated with participant feedback (responses to structured questions and free-text feedback collected during Getting it Right), study administrative data (participant screening logs, communication logs, study protocol, deviation logs and ethics correspondence) and interviewer field notes. RESULTS: Three themes about staff, patient and community perspectives concerning research participation developed: (1) considering the needs, risk, preferences and impact of participation in research for staff, patients and community; (2) building staff confidence speaking to patients about research and SEWB problems and (3) patients speaking openly about their SEWB. Some staff described pressure to ensure patients had a positive experience with the research, to respond appropriately if patients became upset or SEWB problems were identified during interviews, or due to their dual role as community member and researcher. Patients and staff reported that patients were more likely to participate if they knew the staff outside of the service, especially staff with a shared cultural background, and they perceived SEWB as a community priority. Staff reported their skills speaking to patients about the research and SEWB improved during the research, which built their confidence. Contrary to staff preconceptions, staff and patients reported that many patients appreciated the opportunity to speak about their SEWB and contributing to research that may eventually enhance SEWB in their community. CONCLUSION: Our research project was considered acceptable by most staff and patients. The positive outcomes reported by staff and feedback from patients highlights the importance of providing opportunities for people to speak about their SEWB and for research-informed SEWB PHC care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Getting it Right is registered on ANZCTR12614000705684.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6781305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67813052019-10-17 ‘We’re here to listen and help them as well’: a qualitative study of staff and Indigenous patient perceptions about participating in social and emotional wellbeing research at primary healthcare services Farnbach, Sara Gee, Graham Eades, Anne-Marie Evans, John Robert Fernando, Jamie Hammond, Belinda Simms, Matty DeMasi, Karrina Hackett, Maree L. BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Research can inform culturally-appropriate care to strengthen social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB) among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (hereafter, the term ‘Indigenous Peoples’ is respectfully used and refers to all Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia). We acknowledge the cultural diversity of Australia’s Indigenous First Peoples and they do not represent a homogenous group.) (hereafter Indigenous) Peoples. We explore the perspectives of primary healthcare staff and Indigenous patients about their willingness to and experiences participating in SEWB research. METHOD: Process evaluation using grounded theory approaches of Getting it Right: The validation study, a national validation designed Indigenous SEWB research project (N = 500). Primary healthcare staff (n = 36) and community members (n = 4) from nine of ten primary healthcare services involved with the research project completed qualitative semi-structured interviews. Interview data were triangulated with participant feedback (responses to structured questions and free-text feedback collected during Getting it Right), study administrative data (participant screening logs, communication logs, study protocol, deviation logs and ethics correspondence) and interviewer field notes. RESULTS: Three themes about staff, patient and community perspectives concerning research participation developed: (1) considering the needs, risk, preferences and impact of participation in research for staff, patients and community; (2) building staff confidence speaking to patients about research and SEWB problems and (3) patients speaking openly about their SEWB. Some staff described pressure to ensure patients had a positive experience with the research, to respond appropriately if patients became upset or SEWB problems were identified during interviews, or due to their dual role as community member and researcher. Patients and staff reported that patients were more likely to participate if they knew the staff outside of the service, especially staff with a shared cultural background, and they perceived SEWB as a community priority. Staff reported their skills speaking to patients about the research and SEWB improved during the research, which built their confidence. Contrary to staff preconceptions, staff and patients reported that many patients appreciated the opportunity to speak about their SEWB and contributing to research that may eventually enhance SEWB in their community. CONCLUSION: Our research project was considered acceptable by most staff and patients. The positive outcomes reported by staff and feedback from patients highlights the importance of providing opportunities for people to speak about their SEWB and for research-informed SEWB PHC care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Getting it Right is registered on ANZCTR12614000705684. BioMed Central 2019-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6781305/ /pubmed/31590642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2263-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Farnbach, Sara
Gee, Graham
Eades, Anne-Marie
Evans, John Robert
Fernando, Jamie
Hammond, Belinda
Simms, Matty
DeMasi, Karrina
Hackett, Maree L.
‘We’re here to listen and help them as well’: a qualitative study of staff and Indigenous patient perceptions about participating in social and emotional wellbeing research at primary healthcare services
title ‘We’re here to listen and help them as well’: a qualitative study of staff and Indigenous patient perceptions about participating in social and emotional wellbeing research at primary healthcare services
title_full ‘We’re here to listen and help them as well’: a qualitative study of staff and Indigenous patient perceptions about participating in social and emotional wellbeing research at primary healthcare services
title_fullStr ‘We’re here to listen and help them as well’: a qualitative study of staff and Indigenous patient perceptions about participating in social and emotional wellbeing research at primary healthcare services
title_full_unstemmed ‘We’re here to listen and help them as well’: a qualitative study of staff and Indigenous patient perceptions about participating in social and emotional wellbeing research at primary healthcare services
title_short ‘We’re here to listen and help them as well’: a qualitative study of staff and Indigenous patient perceptions about participating in social and emotional wellbeing research at primary healthcare services
title_sort ‘we’re here to listen and help them as well’: a qualitative study of staff and indigenous patient perceptions about participating in social and emotional wellbeing research at primary healthcare services
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31590642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2263-8
work_keys_str_mv AT farnbachsara wereheretolistenandhelpthemaswellaqualitativestudyofstaffandindigenouspatientperceptionsaboutparticipatinginsocialandemotionalwellbeingresearchatprimaryhealthcareservices
AT geegraham wereheretolistenandhelpthemaswellaqualitativestudyofstaffandindigenouspatientperceptionsaboutparticipatinginsocialandemotionalwellbeingresearchatprimaryhealthcareservices
AT eadesannemarie wereheretolistenandhelpthemaswellaqualitativestudyofstaffandindigenouspatientperceptionsaboutparticipatinginsocialandemotionalwellbeingresearchatprimaryhealthcareservices
AT evansjohnrobert wereheretolistenandhelpthemaswellaqualitativestudyofstaffandindigenouspatientperceptionsaboutparticipatinginsocialandemotionalwellbeingresearchatprimaryhealthcareservices
AT fernandojamie wereheretolistenandhelpthemaswellaqualitativestudyofstaffandindigenouspatientperceptionsaboutparticipatinginsocialandemotionalwellbeingresearchatprimaryhealthcareservices
AT hammondbelinda wereheretolistenandhelpthemaswellaqualitativestudyofstaffandindigenouspatientperceptionsaboutparticipatinginsocialandemotionalwellbeingresearchatprimaryhealthcareservices
AT simmsmatty wereheretolistenandhelpthemaswellaqualitativestudyofstaffandindigenouspatientperceptionsaboutparticipatinginsocialandemotionalwellbeingresearchatprimaryhealthcareservices
AT demasikarrina wereheretolistenandhelpthemaswellaqualitativestudyofstaffandindigenouspatientperceptionsaboutparticipatinginsocialandemotionalwellbeingresearchatprimaryhealthcareservices
AT hackettmareel wereheretolistenandhelpthemaswellaqualitativestudyofstaffandindigenouspatientperceptionsaboutparticipatinginsocialandemotionalwellbeingresearchatprimaryhealthcareservices
AT wereheretolistenandhelpthemaswellaqualitativestudyofstaffandindigenouspatientperceptionsaboutparticipatinginsocialandemotionalwellbeingresearchatprimaryhealthcareservices