Cargando…

Adherence and barriers to penile rehabilitation over 2 years following radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: A variety of penile rehabilitation (PR) therapies are available to improve post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction (ED) with mixed results. It is uncertain how adherent men are to PR therapies. The aim of this study is to determine adherence to and identify barriers to PR treatment. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albaugh, Jeffrey, Adamic, Brittany, Chang, Cecilia, Kirwen, Nicholas, Aizen, Joshua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31590638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0516-y
_version_ 1783457357174407168
author Albaugh, Jeffrey
Adamic, Brittany
Chang, Cecilia
Kirwen, Nicholas
Aizen, Joshua
author_facet Albaugh, Jeffrey
Adamic, Brittany
Chang, Cecilia
Kirwen, Nicholas
Aizen, Joshua
author_sort Albaugh, Jeffrey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A variety of penile rehabilitation (PR) therapies are available to improve post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction (ED) with mixed results. It is uncertain how adherent men are to PR therapies. The aim of this study is to determine adherence to and identify barriers to PR treatment. METHODS: A longitudinal cross-sectional approach was used in men who underwent radical prostatectomy over 2 years. Men were instructed to take a PDE5 inhibitor (PDE5i) three times per week, and if required, utilize a vacuum constriction device (VCD) daily. Outcomes were measured by multiple validated questionnaires. In addition, penile stretched length, side effects, compliance to PR regimen & barriers to participation were documented. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were enrolled, however only 49 completed evaluation at 3 or more timepoints and were included in analysis. This cohort was an average age of 58.1 years (±7.7), had robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (91.7%), and had bilateral nerve sparing procedures (95.8%). Majority (62.5%) reported normal SHIM pre-operatively, however 79% used PDE5i. Erectile function as measured by IIEF and Erection Hardness Rating were negatively affected post-operatively, with gradual improvement in parameters throughout the 24 month follow up. Of the participants who had normal pre-op SHIM, only 23.1 and 28.6% regained baseline function at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Orgasm was significantly diminished immediately post-operatively, however, at the end of the study period only 37% of men reported diminished climax and no men reported absent orgasm. Adherence to penile rehabilitation therapies declined overtime. Men took oral PDE5i on average 2.3 times weekly at 12 and 24 months (p < 0.001). Men used the VCD 2.3–3.9 days a week, which declined overtime (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in erectile and orgasm parameters was observed over time, but most men did not return to baseline function. Despite comprehensive instructions and a frequent follow up schedule, PDE5i and VCD adherence was poor. High attrition rates were noted with only 55.8% of men remaining at 12 months and 45% of men completing 24 months. The most common barriers to PR adherence were cost, inconvenience and perceived ineffectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6781374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67813742019-10-17 Adherence and barriers to penile rehabilitation over 2 years following radical prostatectomy Albaugh, Jeffrey Adamic, Brittany Chang, Cecilia Kirwen, Nicholas Aizen, Joshua BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: A variety of penile rehabilitation (PR) therapies are available to improve post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction (ED) with mixed results. It is uncertain how adherent men are to PR therapies. The aim of this study is to determine adherence to and identify barriers to PR treatment. METHODS: A longitudinal cross-sectional approach was used in men who underwent radical prostatectomy over 2 years. Men were instructed to take a PDE5 inhibitor (PDE5i) three times per week, and if required, utilize a vacuum constriction device (VCD) daily. Outcomes were measured by multiple validated questionnaires. In addition, penile stretched length, side effects, compliance to PR regimen & barriers to participation were documented. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were enrolled, however only 49 completed evaluation at 3 or more timepoints and were included in analysis. This cohort was an average age of 58.1 years (±7.7), had robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (91.7%), and had bilateral nerve sparing procedures (95.8%). Majority (62.5%) reported normal SHIM pre-operatively, however 79% used PDE5i. Erectile function as measured by IIEF and Erection Hardness Rating were negatively affected post-operatively, with gradual improvement in parameters throughout the 24 month follow up. Of the participants who had normal pre-op SHIM, only 23.1 and 28.6% regained baseline function at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Orgasm was significantly diminished immediately post-operatively, however, at the end of the study period only 37% of men reported diminished climax and no men reported absent orgasm. Adherence to penile rehabilitation therapies declined overtime. Men took oral PDE5i on average 2.3 times weekly at 12 and 24 months (p < 0.001). Men used the VCD 2.3–3.9 days a week, which declined overtime (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in erectile and orgasm parameters was observed over time, but most men did not return to baseline function. Despite comprehensive instructions and a frequent follow up schedule, PDE5i and VCD adherence was poor. High attrition rates were noted with only 55.8% of men remaining at 12 months and 45% of men completing 24 months. The most common barriers to PR adherence were cost, inconvenience and perceived ineffectiveness. BioMed Central 2019-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6781374/ /pubmed/31590638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0516-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Albaugh, Jeffrey
Adamic, Brittany
Chang, Cecilia
Kirwen, Nicholas
Aizen, Joshua
Adherence and barriers to penile rehabilitation over 2 years following radical prostatectomy
title Adherence and barriers to penile rehabilitation over 2 years following radical prostatectomy
title_full Adherence and barriers to penile rehabilitation over 2 years following radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Adherence and barriers to penile rehabilitation over 2 years following radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Adherence and barriers to penile rehabilitation over 2 years following radical prostatectomy
title_short Adherence and barriers to penile rehabilitation over 2 years following radical prostatectomy
title_sort adherence and barriers to penile rehabilitation over 2 years following radical prostatectomy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31590638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0516-y
work_keys_str_mv AT albaughjeffrey adherenceandbarrierstopenilerehabilitationover2yearsfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT adamicbrittany adherenceandbarrierstopenilerehabilitationover2yearsfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT changcecilia adherenceandbarrierstopenilerehabilitationover2yearsfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT kirwennicholas adherenceandbarrierstopenilerehabilitationover2yearsfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT aizenjoshua adherenceandbarrierstopenilerehabilitationover2yearsfollowingradicalprostatectomy