Cargando…

Validity Of The Self-Reported Domains Of Subjective Extent Of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence) Scale In Comparison With Electronically Monitored Adherence To Cardiovascular Medications

BACKGROUND: Self-report measures are important tools for assessing adherence to medication. Many of these scales, however, combine the extent of and reasons for nonadherence in one instrument, and have limited reliability and validity. The present study was the first to assess the convergent validit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cornelius, Talea, Voils, Corrine I, Umland, Redeana C, Kronish, Ian M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31631982
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S225460
_version_ 1783457403648344064
author Cornelius, Talea
Voils, Corrine I
Umland, Redeana C
Kronish, Ian M
author_facet Cornelius, Talea
Voils, Corrine I
Umland, Redeana C
Kronish, Ian M
author_sort Cornelius, Talea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Self-report measures are important tools for assessing adherence to medication. Many of these scales, however, combine the extent of and reasons for nonadherence in one instrument, and have limited reliability and validity. The present study was the first to assess the convergent validity of the self-reported Domains of Subjective Extent of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence) scale with electronically measured adherence to a single cardiovascular medication. METHODS: English- and Spanish-speaking patients evaluated for acute coronary syndrome (N=165; n=68 and n= 97, respectively) were recruited from an urban academic emergency department. Post-hospital discharge, participants were mailed a medication bottle with an electronic cap (eCAP) that recorded bottle openings. At 1 month, participants completed the 3-item DOSE-Nonadherence scale, which assessed the extent to which patients missed, skipped, or did not take the eCAP-monitored medication over the past 7 days. Correlations, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated using eCAP-monitored correct dosing adherence over the same 7-day time period as the reference standard. RESULTS: The most commonly assessed medication was aspirin (70.91%). Correlations between self-reported and electronically monitored adherence were low-to-moderate: English-speaking participants (n=68), r=0.24, p=0.046; Spanish-speaking participants (n=97), r=0.18, p=0.071. Sensitivity was low (0.47 English, 0.28 Spanish) and specificity was moderate (0.77 English, 0.88 Spanish). CONCLUSIONS: The DOSE-Nonadherence scale was associated with electronically monitored adherence to a single daily cardiovascular medication in English-speaking participants, but had weak diagnostic properties when using electronic adherence as the reference standard.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6781608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67816082019-10-18 Validity Of The Self-Reported Domains Of Subjective Extent Of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence) Scale In Comparison With Electronically Monitored Adherence To Cardiovascular Medications Cornelius, Talea Voils, Corrine I Umland, Redeana C Kronish, Ian M Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Self-report measures are important tools for assessing adherence to medication. Many of these scales, however, combine the extent of and reasons for nonadherence in one instrument, and have limited reliability and validity. The present study was the first to assess the convergent validity of the self-reported Domains of Subjective Extent of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence) scale with electronically measured adherence to a single cardiovascular medication. METHODS: English- and Spanish-speaking patients evaluated for acute coronary syndrome (N=165; n=68 and n= 97, respectively) were recruited from an urban academic emergency department. Post-hospital discharge, participants were mailed a medication bottle with an electronic cap (eCAP) that recorded bottle openings. At 1 month, participants completed the 3-item DOSE-Nonadherence scale, which assessed the extent to which patients missed, skipped, or did not take the eCAP-monitored medication over the past 7 days. Correlations, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated using eCAP-monitored correct dosing adherence over the same 7-day time period as the reference standard. RESULTS: The most commonly assessed medication was aspirin (70.91%). Correlations between self-reported and electronically monitored adherence were low-to-moderate: English-speaking participants (n=68), r=0.24, p=0.046; Spanish-speaking participants (n=97), r=0.18, p=0.071. Sensitivity was low (0.47 English, 0.28 Spanish) and specificity was moderate (0.77 English, 0.88 Spanish). CONCLUSIONS: The DOSE-Nonadherence scale was associated with electronically monitored adherence to a single daily cardiovascular medication in English-speaking participants, but had weak diagnostic properties when using electronic adherence as the reference standard. Dove 2019-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6781608/ /pubmed/31631982 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S225460 Text en © 2019 Cornelius et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Cornelius, Talea
Voils, Corrine I
Umland, Redeana C
Kronish, Ian M
Validity Of The Self-Reported Domains Of Subjective Extent Of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence) Scale In Comparison With Electronically Monitored Adherence To Cardiovascular Medications
title Validity Of The Self-Reported Domains Of Subjective Extent Of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence) Scale In Comparison With Electronically Monitored Adherence To Cardiovascular Medications
title_full Validity Of The Self-Reported Domains Of Subjective Extent Of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence) Scale In Comparison With Electronically Monitored Adherence To Cardiovascular Medications
title_fullStr Validity Of The Self-Reported Domains Of Subjective Extent Of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence) Scale In Comparison With Electronically Monitored Adherence To Cardiovascular Medications
title_full_unstemmed Validity Of The Self-Reported Domains Of Subjective Extent Of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence) Scale In Comparison With Electronically Monitored Adherence To Cardiovascular Medications
title_short Validity Of The Self-Reported Domains Of Subjective Extent Of Nonadherence (DOSE-Nonadherence) Scale In Comparison With Electronically Monitored Adherence To Cardiovascular Medications
title_sort validity of the self-reported domains of subjective extent of nonadherence (dose-nonadherence) scale in comparison with electronically monitored adherence to cardiovascular medications
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6781608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31631982
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S225460
work_keys_str_mv AT corneliustalea validityoftheselfreporteddomainsofsubjectiveextentofnonadherencedosenonadherencescaleincomparisonwithelectronicallymonitoredadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT voilscorrinei validityoftheselfreporteddomainsofsubjectiveextentofnonadherencedosenonadherencescaleincomparisonwithelectronicallymonitoredadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT umlandredeanac validityoftheselfreporteddomainsofsubjectiveextentofnonadherencedosenonadherencescaleincomparisonwithelectronicallymonitoredadherencetocardiovascularmedications
AT kronishianm validityoftheselfreporteddomainsofsubjectiveextentofnonadherencedosenonadherencescaleincomparisonwithelectronicallymonitoredadherencetocardiovascularmedications